Skip to content

A Study to Learn More About the Menopausal Hormone Therapies in Korea

Treatment Patterns of Menopausal Hormone Therapy in South Korea: a Nationwide Cohort Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06033521
Enrollment
1036294
Registered
2023-09-13
Start date
2023-09-12
Completion date
2024-03-11
Last updated
2025-04-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bone Demineralization, Menopause

Keywords

Menopause, Bone Demineralization, Hormone Replacement Therapy

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to learn about how the commonly used menopausal hormone therapies were prescribed and taken in practice. This is done by using healthcare database, to study the overall dangers and benefits of menopausal hormone therapies in real-world practice. This study will include subjects who were newly diagnosed menopausal symptoms between 2012 and 2019. They were all followed up for 12 months at least. The study included the below subjects who: * were aged 40-59 years * were diagnosed to have menopausal symptoms through some medical check-ups The data collected will be used to understand: * how the commonly used menopausal hormone therapies were prescribed and taken in practice * how patients took medication as prescribed by their doctors This might help to understand treatment trends of these therapies.

Interventions

DRUGMenopausal hormone therapy Intervention Type: Drug

Subjects who were newly diagnosed menopausal symptoms between 01 Jan 2012 and 31 Dec 2019, and were followed up for 12 months at least in the HIRA claims database

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
40 Years to 59 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients aged 40-59 years at cohort entry date * Patients who had at least one inpatient or outpatient diagnosis of menopausal symptoms between 01 Jan 2012 and 31 Dec 2019 with any of following diagnosis codes: N95.1, N95.2, N95.3, N95.8, N95.9, M80.0, M81.0, M81.99, M85.99

Exclusion criteria

* Patients diagnosed with breast cancer (C50, D05), endometrial cancer (C54.1), and granulosa cell tumor (C56) within 1 year prior to the index date. * Patients diagnosed with coronary heart disease (I20-I25, I51.6), stroke (I60-64), and VTE (I80.2, I80.3 I26) within 1 year prior to the index date. * Patients diagnosed with viral hepatitis (B16-B19), cirrhosis (K70.2-K70.4, K71.7, K72.0-K72.1, K72.9, K74.0-K74.6, K76.1, K76.6-K76.7, R18, I85.0, I85.9, I86.4, I86.8, I98.2-I98.3), and hepatic cancer (C22) within 1 year prior to the index date. * Patients diagnosed with gallbladder disease (K80, K81, K82, K83, K85.1), gallbladder cancer (C23), extrahepatic bile duct cancer (C24) within 1 year prior to the index date.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Women Who Visited Hospitals for Menopausal Symptoms Distributed Per YearDate of diagnosis of menopausal symptom during inpatient/outpatient hospital visit; retrospective data observed in this study for approximately 6 monthsMenopausal symptoms: at least one inpatient or outpatient claim with any of diagnosis codes based on Korean standard classification of disease, 8th revision(KCD-8):Korean version of ICD-10(International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems,10th revision), per protocol. N95.1: Menopausal, female climacteric states; N95.2:Postmenopausal atrophic vaginitis; N95.3:States associated with artificial menopause; N95.8 Other specified menopausal, perimenopausal disorders; N95.9: Menopausal, perimenopausal disorder, unspecified; M80.0: Postmenopausal osteoporosis with pathological fracture;M81.0: Postmenopausal osteoporosis; M81.99:Osteoporosis, unspecified, site unspecified; Osteopenia; M85.99: Disorder of bone density, structure, unspecified, site unspecified; Osteopenia, mild; Osteopenia, moderate; Osteopenia, severe. One participant could have visited hospital for \>=1 time for different menopausal symptom. Index date: date of first prescription for MHT.
Number of Women With MHT Use Distributed Per YearIndex Date; retrospective data observed in this study for approximately 6 monthsNumber of Women with MHT use distributed per year was reported in this outcome measure. One participant could have taken more than 1 type of MHT hence participants are not fully exclusive. Three types of MHT included ET (estrogen therapy), EPT (estrogen-progestin therapy), and tibolone. Index date was defined as the date of the first prescription for MHT.
Number of Participants According to Each Type of Menopausal Symptoms Distributed Per YearDate of diagnosis of menopausal symptom during inpatient/outpatient hospital visit; retrospective data observed in this study for approximately 6 monthsMenopausal symptoms included vasomotor, bone and joint, genitourinary and psychosomatic. One participant could have more than 1 type of menopausal symptoms. Index date was defined as the date of the first prescription for MHT.
Number of Participants According to Each Type of Menopausal Symptoms Per MHTIndex Date; retrospective data observed in this study for approximately 6 monthsMenopausal symptoms included vasomotor symptoms, bone and joint symptoms, genitourinary symptoms, psychosomatic symptoms for systemic, Estrogen Therapy (ET), Estrogen-Progestin Therapy (EPT) and Tibolone. One participant could have more than 1 type of menopausal symptoms and have received more than 1 type of therapy. Index date was defined as the date of the first prescription for MHT.
Number of Participants With Use of Any MHT According to Age GroupIndex Date; retrospective data observed in this study for approximately 6 monthsNumber of participants with use of any MHT according to age group were reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of the first prescription for MHT.
Number of Participants With MHT According to Type of AdministrationIndex Date; retrospective data observed in this study for approximately 6 monthsNumber of participants with MHT according to type of administration were reported in this outcome measure. Type of administration included systemic hormone therapy (HT) (oral), systemic HT (transdermal), local HT (transvaginal). One participant could have received more than 1 type of therapy. Index date was defined as the date of the first prescription for MHT.
Percentage of Participants With Change in Treatment Regimen Change at Month 3Month 3 post-index date; retrospective data observed in this study for approximately 6 monthsPercentage of participants with change in treatment regimen at Month 3 were reported in this outcome measure. Data reported in this outcome measure included participants who received the treatments which included Systemic ET, EPT, Tibolone, Local ET and also participants with no treatment. Index date was defined as the date of the first prescription for MHT.
Percentage of Participants With Change in Treatment Regimen Change at Month 6Month 6 post-index date; retrospective data observed in this study for approximately 6 monthsPercentage of participants with change in treatment regimen at Month 6 were reported in this outcome measure. Data reported in this outcome measure included participants who received the treatments which included Systemic ET, EPT, Tibolone, Local ET and also participants with no treatment. Index date was defined as the date of the first prescription for MHT.
Percentage of Participants With Change in Treatment Regimen Change at Month 9Month 9 post-index date; retrospective data observed in this study for approximately 6 monthsPercentage of participants with change in treatment regimen at Month 9 were reported in this outcome measure. Data reported in this outcome measure included participants who received the treatments which included Systemic ET, EPT, Tibolone, Local ET and also participants with no treatment. Index date was defined as the date of the first prescription for MHT.
Percentage of Participants With Change in Treatment Regimen Change at Month 12Month 12 post-index date; retrospective data observed in this study for approximately 6 monthsPercentage of participants with change in treatment regimen at Month 12 were reported in this outcome measure. Data reported in this outcome measure included participants who received the treatments which included Systemic ET, EPT, Tibolone, Local ET and also participants with no treatment. Index date was defined as the date of the first prescription for MHT.
Time to Discontinuation of MHTDuring 2 year of follow up from index date; retrospective data observed in this study for approximately 6 monthsTime to discontinuation was defined as no subsequent prescriptions within 2 months of last prescription date. MHT included: Systemic MHT: ET, EPT, Tibolone and Local MHT: ET. Index date was defined as the date of the first prescription for MHT.
Time to Switching of MHTDuring 2 year of follow up from index date; retrospective data observed in this study for approximately 6 monthsTime to switching of MHT was reported in this outcome measure. Participants who switched the treatment classes were included. MHT included: Systemic MHT: ET, EPT, Tibolone and Local MHT: ET. Index date was defined as the date of the first prescription for MHT.
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Persistence at Month 3 Post-index According to Treatment TypeMonth 3 post-index; retrospective data observed in this study for approximately 6 monthsTreatment persistence was calculated by the average length of treatment of the drugs prescribed at the index date. Index date was defined as the date of the first prescription for MHT.
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Persistence at Month 6 Post-index According to Treatment TypeMonth 6 post-index; retrospective data observed in this study for approximately 6 monthsTreatment persistence was calculated by the average length of treatment of the drugs prescribed at the index date. Index date was defined as the date of the first prescription for MHT.
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Persistence at Month 9 Post-index According to Treatment TypeMonth 9 post-index; retrospective data observed in this study for approximately 6 monthsTreatment persistence was calculated by the average length of treatment of the drugs prescribed at the index date. Index date was defined as the date of the first prescription for MHT.
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Persistence at Month 12 Post-index According to Treatment TypeMonth 12 post-index; retrospective data observed in this study for approximately 6 monthsTreatment persistence was calculated by the average length of treatment of the drugs prescribed at the index date. Index date was defined as the date of the first prescription for MHT.
Mean Treatment Adherence (%)Index Date; retrospective data observed in this study for approximately 6 monthsTreatment adherence was evaluated using medication possession ratio (MPR), calculated as the total number of days of medication supply divided by the number of days in the follow-up period. Data for this outcome is expressed in percentage. Index date was defined as the date of the first prescription for MHT.

Countries

South Korea

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Data for female participants in South Korea, aged 40-59 years who had diagnosis of menopausal symptoms and/or received menopausal hormone therapy (MHT), was retrieved from Health Insurance and Review Assessment (HIRA) database from 1-January-2016 and 31-Decemeber-2020 (included follow-up duration). Retrospective available data was evaluated as per objectives of this study from 12-September-2023 to 11-March-2024 (approximately 6 months).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Participants With MHT
Female participants aged 40-59 years who had diagnosis of menopausal symptoms and received MHT in real-world practice. No intervention was administered during this study.
1,036,294
Total1,036,294

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicParticipants With MHT
Age, Continuous52.53 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.14
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1036294 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Treatment Adherence (%)

Treatment adherence was evaluated using medication possession ratio (MPR), calculated as the total number of days of medication supply divided by the number of days in the follow-up period. Data for this outcome is expressed in percentage. Index date was defined as the date of the first prescription for MHT.

Time frame: Index Date; retrospective data observed in this study for approximately 6 months

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants who met inclusion/exclusion criteria, whose data were included and observed for evaluation in the study. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for specified rows.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With MHTMean Treatment Adherence (%)Systemic MHT: ET37.3 Percentage of daysStandard Deviation 45.5
Participants With MHTMean Treatment Adherence (%)Systemic MHT: EPT22.4 Percentage of daysStandard Deviation 39
Participants With MHTMean Treatment Adherence (%)Systemic MHT: Tibolone35.5 Percentage of daysStandard Deviation 55
Participants With MHTMean Treatment Adherence (%)Local MHT: ET3.1 Percentage of daysStandard Deviation 27.2
Primary

Number of Participants According to Each Type of Menopausal Symptoms Distributed Per Year

Menopausal symptoms included vasomotor, bone and joint, genitourinary and psychosomatic. One participant could have more than 1 type of menopausal symptoms. Index date was defined as the date of the first prescription for MHT.

Time frame: Date of diagnosis of menopausal symptom during inpatient/outpatient hospital visit; retrospective data observed in this study for approximately 6 months

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants who met inclusion/exclusion criteria, whose data were included and observed for evaluation in the study. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified rows.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Participants With MHTNumber of Participants According to Each Type of Menopausal Symptoms Distributed Per YearVasomotor: 2016358505 Participants
Participants With MHTNumber of Participants According to Each Type of Menopausal Symptoms Distributed Per YearBone and joint: 201628208 Participants
Participants With MHTNumber of Participants According to Each Type of Menopausal Symptoms Distributed Per YearGenitourinary: 201680857 Participants
Participants With MHTNumber of Participants According to Each Type of Menopausal Symptoms Distributed Per YearPsychosomatic: 20161809 Participants
Participants With MHTNumber of Participants According to Each Type of Menopausal Symptoms Distributed Per YearVasomotor: 2017119084 Participants
Participants With MHTNumber of Participants According to Each Type of Menopausal Symptoms Distributed Per YearBone and joint: 20178396 Participants
Participants With MHTNumber of Participants According to Each Type of Menopausal Symptoms Distributed Per YearGenitourinary: 201757812 Participants
Participants With MHTNumber of Participants According to Each Type of Menopausal Symptoms Distributed Per YearPsychosomatic: 2017780 Participants
Participants With MHTNumber of Participants According to Each Type of Menopausal Symptoms Distributed Per YearVasomotor: 201892169 Participants
Participants With MHTNumber of Participants According to Each Type of Menopausal Symptoms Distributed Per YearBone and joint: 20186635 Participants
Participants With MHTNumber of Participants According to Each Type of Menopausal Symptoms Distributed Per YearGenitourinary: 201848640 Participants
Participants With MHTNumber of Participants According to Each Type of Menopausal Symptoms Distributed Per YearPsychosomatic: 2018648 Participants
Participants With MHTNumber of Participants According to Each Type of Menopausal Symptoms Distributed Per YearVasomotor: 201985728 Participants
Participants With MHTNumber of Participants According to Each Type of Menopausal Symptoms Distributed Per YearBone and joint: 20196025 Participants
Participants With MHTNumber of Participants According to Each Type of Menopausal Symptoms Distributed Per YearGenitourinary: 201942798 Participants
Participants With MHTNumber of Participants According to Each Type of Menopausal Symptoms Distributed Per YearPsychosomatic: 2019652 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants According to Each Type of Menopausal Symptoms Per MHT

Menopausal symptoms included vasomotor symptoms, bone and joint symptoms, genitourinary symptoms, psychosomatic symptoms for systemic, Estrogen Therapy (ET), Estrogen-Progestin Therapy (EPT) and Tibolone. One participant could have more than 1 type of menopausal symptoms and have received more than 1 type of therapy. Index date was defined as the date of the first prescription for MHT.

Time frame: Index Date; retrospective data observed in this study for approximately 6 months

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants who met inclusion/exclusion criteria, whose data were included and observed for evaluation in the study. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified rows.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Participants With MHTNumber of Participants According to Each Type of Menopausal Symptoms Per MHTSystemic MHT: Vasomotor symptoms649307 Participants
Participants With MHTNumber of Participants According to Each Type of Menopausal Symptoms Per MHTSystemic MHT: Bone and joint symptoms83856 Participants
Participants With MHTNumber of Participants According to Each Type of Menopausal Symptoms Per MHTSystemic MHT: Genitourinary symptoms44385 Participants
Participants With MHTNumber of Participants According to Each Type of Menopausal Symptoms Per MHTSystemic MHT: Psychosomatic symptoms4951 Participants
Participants With MHTNumber of Participants According to Each Type of Menopausal Symptoms Per MHTET: Vasomotor symptoms80044 Participants
Participants With MHTNumber of Participants According to Each Type of Menopausal Symptoms Per MHTET: Bone and joint symptoms12479 Participants
Participants With MHTNumber of Participants According to Each Type of Menopausal Symptoms Per MHTET: Genitourinary symptoms8087 Participants
Participants With MHTNumber of Participants According to Each Type of Menopausal Symptoms Per MHTET: Psychosomatic symptoms710 Participants
Participants With MHTNumber of Participants According to Each Type of Menopausal Symptoms Per MHTEPT: Vasomotor symptoms287092 Participants
Participants With MHTNumber of Participants According to Each Type of Menopausal Symptoms Per MHTEPT: Bone and joint symptoms30659 Participants
Participants With MHTNumber of Participants According to Each Type of Menopausal Symptoms Per MHTEPT: Genitourinary symptoms16825 Participants
Participants With MHTNumber of Participants According to Each Type of Menopausal Symptoms Per MHTEPT: Psychosomatic symptoms2241 Participants
Participants With MHTNumber of Participants According to Each Type of Menopausal Symptoms Per MHTTibolone: Vasomotor symptoms283069 Participants
Participants With MHTNumber of Participants According to Each Type of Menopausal Symptoms Per MHTTibolone: Bone and joint symptoms40833 Participants
Participants With MHTNumber of Participants According to Each Type of Menopausal Symptoms Per MHTTibolone: Genitourinary symptoms19581 Participants
Participants With MHTNumber of Participants According to Each Type of Menopausal Symptoms Per MHTTibolone: Psychosomatic symptoms2021 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With MHT According to Type of Administration

Number of participants with MHT according to type of administration were reported in this outcome measure. Type of administration included systemic hormone therapy (HT) (oral), systemic HT (transdermal), local HT (transvaginal). One participant could have received more than 1 type of therapy. Index date was defined as the date of the first prescription for MHT.

Time frame: Index Date; retrospective data observed in this study for approximately 6 months

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants who met inclusion/exclusion criteria, whose data were included and observed for evaluation in the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Participants With MHTNumber of Participants With MHT According to Type of AdministrationSystemic MHT (oral)693072 Participants
Participants With MHTNumber of Participants With MHT According to Type of AdministrationSystemic MHT (transdermal)2960 Participants
Participants With MHTNumber of Participants With MHT According to Type of AdministrationLocal MHT (transvaginal)378764 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Use of Any MHT According to Age Group

Number of participants with use of any MHT according to age group were reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of the first prescription for MHT.

Time frame: Index Date; retrospective data observed in this study for approximately 6 months

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants who met inclusion/exclusion criteria, whose data were included and observed for evaluation in the study.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Participants With MHTNumber of Participants With Use of Any MHT According to Age Group40-44 Years39917 Participants
Participants With MHTNumber of Participants With Use of Any MHT According to Age Group45-49 Years199389 Participants
Participants With MHTNumber of Participants With Use of Any MHT According to Age Group50-54 Years425030 Participants
Participants With MHTNumber of Participants With Use of Any MHT According to Age Group55-59 Years371958 Participants
Primary

Number of Women Who Visited Hospitals for Menopausal Symptoms Distributed Per Year

Menopausal symptoms: at least one inpatient or outpatient claim with any of diagnosis codes based on Korean standard classification of disease, 8th revision(KCD-8):Korean version of ICD-10(International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems,10th revision), per protocol. N95.1: Menopausal, female climacteric states; N95.2:Postmenopausal atrophic vaginitis; N95.3:States associated with artificial menopause; N95.8 Other specified menopausal, perimenopausal disorders; N95.9: Menopausal, perimenopausal disorder, unspecified; M80.0: Postmenopausal osteoporosis with pathological fracture;M81.0: Postmenopausal osteoporosis; M81.99:Osteoporosis, unspecified, site unspecified; Osteopenia; M85.99: Disorder of bone density, structure, unspecified, site unspecified; Osteopenia, mild; Osteopenia, moderate; Osteopenia, severe. One participant could have visited hospital for \>=1 time for different menopausal symptom. Index date: date of first prescription for MHT.

Time frame: Date of diagnosis of menopausal symptom during inpatient/outpatient hospital visit; retrospective data observed in this study for approximately 6 months

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants who met inclusion/exclusion criteria, whose data were included and observed for evaluation in the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Participants With MHTNumber of Women Who Visited Hospitals for Menopausal Symptoms Distributed Per Year2016786616 Participants
Participants With MHTNumber of Women Who Visited Hospitals for Menopausal Symptoms Distributed Per Year2017787425 Participants
Participants With MHTNumber of Women Who Visited Hospitals for Menopausal Symptoms Distributed Per Year2018791890 Participants
Participants With MHTNumber of Women Who Visited Hospitals for Menopausal Symptoms Distributed Per Year2019818749 Participants
Primary

Number of Women With MHT Use Distributed Per Year

Number of Women with MHT use distributed per year was reported in this outcome measure. One participant could have taken more than 1 type of MHT hence participants are not fully exclusive. Three types of MHT included ET (estrogen therapy), EPT (estrogen-progestin therapy), and tibolone. Index date was defined as the date of the first prescription for MHT.

Time frame: Index Date; retrospective data observed in this study for approximately 6 months

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants who met inclusion/exclusion criteria, whose data were included and observed for evaluation in the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Participants With MHTNumber of Women With MHT Use Distributed Per Year2016446702 Participants
Participants With MHTNumber of Women With MHT Use Distributed Per Year2017473592 Participants
Participants With MHTNumber of Women With MHT Use Distributed Per Year2018481568 Participants
Participants With MHTNumber of Women With MHT Use Distributed Per Year2019494192 Participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Change in Treatment Regimen Change at Month 12

Percentage of participants with change in treatment regimen at Month 12 were reported in this outcome measure. Data reported in this outcome measure included participants who received the treatments which included Systemic ET, EPT, Tibolone, Local ET and also participants with no treatment. Index date was defined as the date of the first prescription for MHT.

Time frame: Month 12 post-index date; retrospective data observed in this study for approximately 6 months

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants who met inclusion/exclusion criteria, whose data were included and observed for evaluation in the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Participants With MHTPercentage of Participants With Change in Treatment Regimen Change at Month 12Systemic ET3.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With MHTPercentage of Participants With Change in Treatment Regimen Change at Month 12EPT7.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With MHTPercentage of Participants With Change in Treatment Regimen Change at Month 12Tibolone9.4 Percentage of participants
Participants With MHTPercentage of Participants With Change in Treatment Regimen Change at Month 12Local ET0.5 Percentage of participants
Participants With MHTPercentage of Participants With Change in Treatment Regimen Change at Month 12No treatment provided80.1 Percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Change in Treatment Regimen Change at Month 3

Percentage of participants with change in treatment regimen at Month 3 were reported in this outcome measure. Data reported in this outcome measure included participants who received the treatments which included Systemic ET, EPT, Tibolone, Local ET and also participants with no treatment. Index date was defined as the date of the first prescription for MHT.

Time frame: Month 3 post-index date; retrospective data observed in this study for approximately 6 months

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants who met inclusion/exclusion criteria, whose data were included and observed for evaluation in the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Participants With MHTPercentage of Participants With Change in Treatment Regimen Change at Month 3Systemic ET5.8 Percentage of participants
Participants With MHTPercentage of Participants With Change in Treatment Regimen Change at Month 3EPT17.6 Percentage of participants
Participants With MHTPercentage of Participants With Change in Treatment Regimen Change at Month 3Tibolone20.4 Percentage of participants
Participants With MHTPercentage of Participants With Change in Treatment Regimen Change at Month 3Local ET4.1 Percentage of participants
Participants With MHTPercentage of Participants With Change in Treatment Regimen Change at Month 3No treatment provided52.1 Percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Change in Treatment Regimen Change at Month 6

Percentage of participants with change in treatment regimen at Month 6 were reported in this outcome measure. Data reported in this outcome measure included participants who received the treatments which included Systemic ET, EPT, Tibolone, Local ET and also participants with no treatment. Index date was defined as the date of the first prescription for MHT.

Time frame: Month 6 post-index date; retrospective data observed in this study for approximately 6 months

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants who met inclusion/exclusion criteria, whose data were included and observed for evaluation in the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Participants With MHTPercentage of Participants With Change in Treatment Regimen Change at Month 6Systemic ET4.3 Percentage of participants
Participants With MHTPercentage of Participants With Change in Treatment Regimen Change at Month 6EPT11.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With MHTPercentage of Participants With Change in Treatment Regimen Change at Month 6Tibolone14.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With MHTPercentage of Participants With Change in Treatment Regimen Change at Month 6Local ET0.9 Percentage of participants
Participants With MHTPercentage of Participants With Change in Treatment Regimen Change at Month 6No treatment provided69.8 Percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Change in Treatment Regimen Change at Month 9

Percentage of participants with change in treatment regimen at Month 9 were reported in this outcome measure. Data reported in this outcome measure included participants who received the treatments which included Systemic ET, EPT, Tibolone, Local ET and also participants with no treatment. Index date was defined as the date of the first prescription for MHT.

Time frame: Month 9 post-index date; retrospective data observed in this study for approximately 6 months

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants who met inclusion/exclusion criteria, whose data were included and observed for evaluation in the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Participants With MHTPercentage of Participants With Change in Treatment Regimen Change at Month 9Systemic ET3.5 Percentage of participants
Participants With MHTPercentage of Participants With Change in Treatment Regimen Change at Month 9EPT8.5 Percentage of participants
Participants With MHTPercentage of Participants With Change in Treatment Regimen Change at Month 9Tibolone11.1 Percentage of participants
Participants With MHTPercentage of Participants With Change in Treatment Regimen Change at Month 9Local ET0.6 Percentage of participants
Participants With MHTPercentage of Participants With Change in Treatment Regimen Change at Month 9No treatment provided76.3 Percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Treatment Persistence at Month 12 Post-index According to Treatment Type

Treatment persistence was calculated by the average length of treatment of the drugs prescribed at the index date. Index date was defined as the date of the first prescription for MHT.

Time frame: Month 12 post-index; retrospective data observed in this study for approximately 6 months

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants who met inclusion/exclusion criteria, whose data were included and observed for evaluation in the study. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for specified rows.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Participants With MHTPercentage of Participants With Treatment Persistence at Month 12 Post-index According to Treatment TypeSystemic MHT: ET33.1 Percentage of participants
Participants With MHTPercentage of Participants With Treatment Persistence at Month 12 Post-index According to Treatment TypeSystemic MHT: EPT22.6 Percentage of participants
Participants With MHTPercentage of Participants With Treatment Persistence at Month 12 Post-index According to Treatment TypeSystemic MHT: Tibolone30.3 Percentage of participants
Participants With MHTPercentage of Participants With Treatment Persistence at Month 12 Post-index According to Treatment TypeLocal MHT: ET0.2 Percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Treatment Persistence at Month 3 Post-index According to Treatment Type

Treatment persistence was calculated by the average length of treatment of the drugs prescribed at the index date. Index date was defined as the date of the first prescription for MHT.

Time frame: Month 3 post-index; retrospective data observed in this study for approximately 6 months

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants who met inclusion/exclusion criteria, whose data were included and observed for evaluation in the study. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for specified rows.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Participants With MHTPercentage of Participants With Treatment Persistence at Month 3 Post-index According to Treatment TypeSystemic MHT: ET69.5 Percentage of participants
Participants With MHTPercentage of Participants With Treatment Persistence at Month 3 Post-index According to Treatment TypeSystemic MHT: EPT60.9 Percentage of participants
Participants With MHTPercentage of Participants With Treatment Persistence at Month 3 Post-index According to Treatment TypeSystemic MHT: Tibolone75.8 Percentage of participants
Participants With MHTPercentage of Participants With Treatment Persistence at Month 3 Post-index According to Treatment TypeLocal MHT: ET11.8 Percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Treatment Persistence at Month 6 Post-index According to Treatment Type

Treatment persistence was calculated by the average length of treatment of the drugs prescribed at the index date. Index date was defined as the date of the first prescription for MHT.

Time frame: Month 6 post-index; retrospective data observed in this study for approximately 6 months

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants who met inclusion/exclusion criteria, whose data were included and observed for evaluation in the study. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for specified rows.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Participants With MHTPercentage of Participants With Treatment Persistence at Month 6 Post-index According to Treatment TypeSystemic MHT: ET48.2 Percentage of participants
Participants With MHTPercentage of Participants With Treatment Persistence at Month 6 Post-index According to Treatment TypeSystemic MHT: EPT36.7 Percentage of participants
Participants With MHTPercentage of Participants With Treatment Persistence at Month 6 Post-index According to Treatment TypeSystemic MHT: Tibolone46.4 Percentage of participants
Participants With MHTPercentage of Participants With Treatment Persistence at Month 6 Post-index According to Treatment TypeLocal MHT: ET1.1 Percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Treatment Persistence at Month 9 Post-index According to Treatment Type

Treatment persistence was calculated by the average length of treatment of the drugs prescribed at the index date. Index date was defined as the date of the first prescription for MHT.

Time frame: Month 9 post-index; retrospective data observed in this study for approximately 6 months

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants who met inclusion/exclusion criteria, whose data were included and observed for evaluation in the study. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for specified rows.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Participants With MHTPercentage of Participants With Treatment Persistence at Month 9 Post-index According to Treatment TypeSystemic MHT: ET38.7 Percentage of participants
Participants With MHTPercentage of Participants With Treatment Persistence at Month 9 Post-index According to Treatment TypeSystemic MHT: EPT27.9 Percentage of participants
Participants With MHTPercentage of Participants With Treatment Persistence at Month 9 Post-index According to Treatment TypeSystemic MHT: Tibolone36.4 Percentage of participants
Participants With MHTPercentage of Participants With Treatment Persistence at Month 9 Post-index According to Treatment TypeLocal MHT: ET0.4 Percentage of participants
Primary

Time to Discontinuation of MHT

Time to discontinuation was defined as no subsequent prescriptions within 2 months of last prescription date. MHT included: Systemic MHT: ET, EPT, Tibolone and Local MHT: ET. Index date was defined as the date of the first prescription for MHT.

Time frame: During 2 year of follow up from index date; retrospective data observed in this study for approximately 6 months

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants who met inclusion/exclusion criteria, whose data were included and observed for evaluation in the study. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for specified rows.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With MHTTime to Discontinuation of MHTSystemic MHT: ET14.4 MonthsStandard Deviation 17.7
Participants With MHTTime to Discontinuation of MHTSystemic MHT: EPT10.1 MonthsStandard Deviation 13.7
Participants With MHTTime to Discontinuation of MHTSystemic MHT: Tibolone13.4 MonthsStandard Deviation 16.6
Participants With MHTTime to Discontinuation of MHTLocal MHT: ET2.4 MonthsStandard Deviation 1.2
Primary

Time to Switching of MHT

Time to switching of MHT was reported in this outcome measure. Participants who switched the treatment classes were included. MHT included: Systemic MHT: ET, EPT, Tibolone and Local MHT: ET. Index date was defined as the date of the first prescription for MHT.

Time frame: During 2 year of follow up from index date; retrospective data observed in this study for approximately 6 months

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants who met inclusion/exclusion criteria, whose data were included and observed for evaluation in the study. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for specified rows.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With MHTTime to Switching of MHTSystemic MHT: ET13.2 MonthsStandard Deviation 15
Participants With MHTTime to Switching of MHTSystemic MHT: EPT16.9 MonthsStandard Deviation 15.5
Participants With MHTTime to Switching of MHTSystemic MHT: Tibolone13.9 MonthsStandard Deviation 14.7
Participants With MHTTime to Switching of MHTLocal MHT: ET7.1 MonthsStandard Deviation 11.7

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026