Skip to content

Potassium-titanyl Phosphate (KTP) Laser vs KTP Laser and Ivermectin Cream for Facial Rosacea

Comparison of the Efficacy of Potassium-titanyl Phosphate (KTP) Laser vs KTP Laser Combined With Ivermectin 1% Cream for Facial Rosacea: a Randomized Split-face Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06033352
Acronym
KIR
Enrollment
22
Registered
2023-09-13
Start date
2023-09-12
Completion date
2024-11-01
Last updated
2024-12-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rosacea

Keywords

Rosacea, Laser, Ivermectin

Brief summary

Rosacea is a frequent chronic inflammatory disease affecting mainly the face but also eyes and scalp. Rosacea is classified into 3 types: erythemato-teleangiectatica, papulopustulosa and phymatosa. Treatments depend on the type and include topical and systemic antibiotics, azelaic acid, topical ivermectin, topical brimonidine, systemic isotretinoin as well as intense pulsed light (IPL) and laser therapies. For treatment of telangiectasia and redness, laser and IPL therapies are the first choice. Vascular lasers, such as pulsed dye lasers (PDL) and potassium-titanyl phosphate (KTP) lasers as well as IPL, have demonstrated good efficacy in reduction of erythema and telangiectasias in patients with rosacea. However, these treatments are expensive and mostly not covered by the health insurance. Therefore, for patients it is important to receive the maximal effect and improvement after each single laser session. Ivermectin is a semi-synthetic derivative of avermectin and has an anti-inflammatory effect as well as an antiparasitic effect on demodex mite. The latter is playing an important pathogenetic role in rosacea. This randomized controlled study aims to compare the effect of KTP laser in combination with ivermectin 1% cream vs KTP laser alone in patients with facial rosacea.

Interventions

DEVICEKTP laser

Treatment with KTP 532 nm laser. Laser fluence depends on erythema intensity and ranges from 7.0 J/cm2 to 11 J/cm2 with a 4-11 mm spot size and 8-12 ms pulse duration.

Application of ivermectin 1% cream 1x/day. Interruption for 4 days in case of irritation/redness.

Sponsors

Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

1:1 within-patient (split-face) random allocation

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Fitzpatrick skin type I-IV * Presence of facial erythematous rosacea or mild papulopustular rosacea with permanent erythema * Informed consent signed

Exclusion criteria

* History of adverse events related to KTP laser therapy * Pregnant or breastfeeding women * Intention to become pregnant during the course of the study * History of intolerance or allergic reaction to ivermectin 1% cream or one of the ingredients * Ongoing treatment for skin cancer * Ongoing treatment with strong inhibitors of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and CYP3A4 (e.g., itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, clarithromycin, cobicistat) * Ongoing treatment with substances with a narrow therapeutic range whose excretion depends substantially on P-gp (e.g. digoxin, ciclosporin) * Inability to understand the study content

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Efficacy of laser and cream vs laser alone in reducing erythema as assessed by NEI16 weeksAny relative decrease of erythema on the side treated with KTP laser and ivermectin 1% cream vs laser alone as assessed by Normalized Erythema Index (NEI), ranging from 0 to 80, with higher values indicating a worst erythema.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Efficacy of laser and cream vs laser alone in reducing erythema as assessed by SRI16 weeksAny relative decrease of erythema on the side treated with KTP laser and ivermectin 1% cream vs laser alone as assessed by Skin Redness Index (SRI), ranging from 1 to 4, with higher score indicating a worst erythema.
Efficacy of laser and cream vs laser alone in reducing erythema as assessed by CEA4, 8, 12, 16 weeksAny decrease of erythema on the side treated with KTP laser and ivermectin 1% cream vs laser alone as assessed by Clinical Erythema Assessment (CEA), ranging from 0 to 4, with higher score indicating a worst erythema.
Efficacy of laser and cream vs laser alone in the clinical improvement of skin lesions as assessed by PGA4, 8, 12, 16 weeksAny change of skin lesions on the side treated with KTP laser and ivermectin 1% cream vs laser alone as assessed by 6-point Physician Global Assessment (PGA), ranging from 0 to 5, with higher score indicating a better outcome.
Patient's satisfaction related to laser and cream vs laser alone in the improvement of skin lesions as assessed by VAS4, 8, 12, 16 weeksAny difference of patient's satisfaction for the improvement of skin lesions on the side treated with KTP laser and ivermectin 1% cream vs laser alone as assessed by a 9-point anchored visual analogue scale (VAS), ranging from -4 to +4, with negative scores indicating a worsening of condition, with 0 indicating no difference and with positive scores indicating an improvement.
Efficacy of laser and cream vs laser alone in reducing telangiectasia severity as assessed by TGS4, 8, 12, 16 weeksAny change of telangiectasia severity on the side treated with KTP laser and ivermectin 1% cream vs laser alone as assessed by telangiectasia grading scale (TGS), ranging from 0 to 3, with higher score indicating a worst telangiectasia severity.
Efficacy of laser and cream vs laser alone in reducing face redness as assessed by the patient4, 8, 12, 16 weeksAny change in the number of days of face redness on the side treated with KTP laser and ivermectin 1% cream vs laser alone, as assessed by the patient.
Efficacy of laser and cream vs laser alone in reducing face purpura as assessed by the patient4, 8, 12, 16 weeksAny change in the number of days of face purpura on the side treated with KTP laser and ivermectin 1% cream vs laser alone, as assessed by the patient.
Efficacy of laser and cream vs laser alone in reducing papules and papulopustules4, 8, 12, 16 weeksAny change in the number of papules and papulopustules on the side treated with KTP laser and ivermectin 1% cream vs laser alone.
Efficacy of laser and cream vs laser alone in reducing face swelling as assessed by the patient4, 8, 12, 16 weeksAny change in the number of days of face swelling on the side treated with KTP laser and ivermectin 1% cream vs laser alone, as assessed by the patient

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of observed side-effects16 weeksCumulative number of observed treatment side-effects.
Incidence of observed adverse events16 weeksCumulative number of observed treatment adverse events.

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 6, 2026