Skip to content

Clinical Implementation of a Novel Decision Support Tool in Patients With Ischemic Heart Disease

Clinical Implementation of a Novel Decision Support Tool in Patients With Ischemic Heart Disease

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06033014
Acronym
PM Heart
Enrollment
8000
Registered
2023-09-13
Start date
2023-09-18
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2024-01-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ischemic Heart Disease

Brief summary

The PM-Heart algorithm (PMHeartIHD) is an in-house developed software that predict the survival prognosis for the individual patient hospitalized with ischemic heart disease (IHD) after a coronary arteriography has been performed. The software is intended to be used as a clinical decision support system i.e. the calculated survival prognosis is expected to enhance the quality of the treating physician's therapeutic considerations concerning (minor) adjustments to the patients treatment and follow-up - all within the framework of the current medical guidelines. Thus, the algorithm does not show the physician specifically what to do, but rather ensures a better knowledgebase for the overall interpretation and choice of management of the patient.

Detailed description

To investigate the clinical usefulness of the developed clinical decision support system - the PMHeartIHD algorithm - we wish to investigate whether the clinical use of the algorithm will; * Improve patient prognosis and, * Minimize the risk of re-hospitalization, compared to patients who are treated without the attending/treating physician knowing the algorithm's prognosis?

Interventions

OTHERPM HeartIHD prediction

The calculated prediction and the explainability factors will be made available to the physician, which the physician then can decide to take into his/hers evaluation about further treatment.

Sponsors

Region Capital Denmark
CollaboratorOTHER
Region Zealand
CollaboratorOTHER
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Hospitalized patients in one of the involved departments of cardiology (see below) with; * Ischemic heart disease; the clinical presentation may be stable, worsening/unstable angina, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction or ST-elevation myocardial infarction, and with - Significant coronary artery lesions or diffuse coronary artery disease on invasive coronary angiography during the admission

Exclusion criteria

* \<18 years of age * Living outside Denmark

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number and duration of readmissions within one month after randomizationFrom randomization to the study and up to 1 year hereafterA composite outcome of a) readmissions within one month, and 2) all-cause mortality within one year - for patients randomized to the study. All the outcomes listed below will be assessed as a comparison between the intervention group and the control group.
Number and cause of death (all-cause mortality) within one year after randomizationFrom randomization to the study and up to 1 year hereafterA composite outcome of a) readmissions within one month, and 2) all-cause mortality within one year - for patients randomized to the study.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Readmission(s) within 30 days of the randomizationUp to 30 days after randomization to the study.Readmission(s) within 30 days of the randomization. Incl. information on the quantity, duration, cause, outcome etc.
Cardiovascular readmission(s) within 30 days of the randomizationUp to 30 days after randomization to the study.Cardiovascular readmission(s) within 30 days of the randomization. Incl. information on the quantity, duration, cause, outcome etc.
Readmission(s) with acute coronary syndromeFrom randomization to the study and up to 1 year hereafterReadmission(s) with acute coronary syndrome. Incl. information on the quantity, duration, cause, outcome etc.
One-year survivalFrom randomization to the study and up to 1 year hereafterOne-year survival
Total number of days the primary hospitalization lastsFrom randomization to the study and up to 1 year hereafterLength (i.e. total number of days) of the primary hospitalization (i.e. when the patient is randomized to the study).
Total number of days at the hospital incl. hospitalizations during the first year after inclusionFrom randomization to the study and up to 1 year hereafterTotal number of days in hospital during the first year after inclusion
Number of hospitalizations the first yearFrom randomization to the study and up to 1 year hereafterNumber of hospitalizations the first year
Dosages (DDD) of drugs at dischargeUp to 1 year after randomization to study.Dosages (DDD) of drugs at discharge + after 1 year.
Number of cardiac follow-up consultations at the hospitalFrom randomization to the study and up to 1 year hereafterNumber of cardiac follow-up consultations at the hospital
Number of check-ups for cardiovascular reasons at the general practitionerFrom randomization to the study and up to 1 year hereafterNumber of check-ups for cardiovascular reasons at the general practitioner.
Incidence of a) new ischemic events, b) arrhythmias, c) and/or heart failureUp to 1 year after randomization to study.Incidence of a) new ischemic events, b) arrhythmias, c) and/or heart failure
Health economic analyses of implementing the algorithmUp to 1 year after randomization to study.Health economic analyses: How does implementing the algorithm alter the overall costs and resource spending, incl. e.g. social benefits, compared with standard-of-care. i.e. does knowing a more precise 1-year mortality prediction reduce/increase the resource consumption. Will be based on economic analyses of the costs related to the abovementioned outcome measurements.
The algorithm's reception and introduction in clinical useBefore start of clinical study and up to 1 year after randomization to study.We wish to investigate how the algorithm is introduced and received in the clinic, both by the medical staff but also the patients. Will be investigated using interviews.
The usability of the algorithmBefore start of clinical study and up to 1 year after randomization to study.The usability of the algorithm i.e. is it easy to use/understand, any praise or criticisms, ideas for new features etc. Will be based on questionaires and feedback from users.
How, and to what extend, is the algorithm used by the medical staff.Before start of clinical study and up to 1 year after randomization to study.We wish to investigate how, and to what extend, the algorithm is used by the medical staff, e.g. are the medical staff inclined to use the prediction, does it alter their treatment choices etc. Will be based on questionaires, interviews, feedback from users, and assessment of look-ups.
Number and type of performed cardiac investigationsFrom randomization to the study and up to 1 year hereafterNumber and type of performed cardiac investigations; i.e. TTE, KAG, Heart-CT, Holter/R-tests, ECG, blood samples, etc.
Number of cardiovascular drugs at dischargeFrom randomization to the study and up to 1 year hereafterNumber of cardiovascular drugs at discharge + after 1 year.

Countries

Denmark

Contacts

Primary ContactHenning Bundgaard, Professor
henning.bundgaard@regionh.dk+4535450512

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026