Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson Disease, Stroke
Conditions
Brief summary
In the last 5 years, the available literature evidence has indicated that, in terms of clinical efficacy, telerehabilitation can give comparable results compared to face-to-face rehabilitation. Studies of post-stroke patients have revealed some benefits of telerehabilitation, such as the ability for patients to self-record pain, mood and activity. Telerehabilitation has comparable efficacy to face-to-face rehabilitation for the recovery of some abilities, such as motor function, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), and independence; it is less effective, however, for the recovery of balance control. Published reviews concerning, in particular, neurological/neurodegenerative diseases show that telerehabilitation systems are effective in maintaining and/or improving some motor aspects, such as balance and gait, and non-motor aspects, such as mood and quality of life; they also increase patient satisfaction, so in the long term they appear to be beneficial, convenient and satisfying for patients and operators. ARC Intellicare is a device undergoing certification as a Class I Medical Device (DM), already clinically tested during two uncontrolled clinical feasibility studies: ARCANGEL study (post-stroke, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03787433) and RICOMINCIARE study (post-COVID19 and Parkinson's disease, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05074771).
Interventions
wearable devices to guide rehabilitation exercise
rehabilitation exercise sheets to guide rehabilitation exercise
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
Early feasibility study
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* patients with diagnosis of Parkinson's disease with Hoehn&Yahr staging 1-3 * diagnosis of multiple sclerosis with extended disability scale score 3.5-6 * diagnosis of ischemic stroke in the past 12 months
Exclusion criteria
* history of falls * dementia * epilepsy
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Efficacy outcome: Six minutes walking test (6MWT) | 8 weeks | number of meters walked in brisk 6 minutes walk |
| Efficacy outcome: Borg scale | 8 weeks | score 0-20 of perceived effort during a motor task (higher scores mean a better or worse outcome) |
| safety outcome: adverse event frequency | 8 weeks | number of adverse events reported |
| Usability outcome: adherence to prescription | 8 weeks | percent of rehabilitation sessions completed |
Countries
Italy