Frailty, Stroke
Conditions
Keywords
frailty, outcome, elderly
Brief summary
The goal of this study is to investigate the influence of frailty on clinical and stroke characteristics, treatment and outcomes in patients with acute stroke. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. How prevalent is frailty in patients with stroke? 2. Which impairments (e.g. undernutrion, impaired mobility, laboratory markers) contribute to frailty? 3. Is the outcome of frail patients worse than those without? 4. Are in-hospital complications more frequent in frail patients than those without?
Detailed description
Stroke is one of the most common causes of disability and mortality worldwide. A recognized complication in stroke patients is frailty, which is associated with increased costs, poorer prognosis, and higher mortality rates. However, there is currently no uniform definition or diagnostic criteria for frailty in stroke patients, and there is a need for standardized frailty assessments in this patient population. The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of frailty in stroke patients at the Stroke Unit of the University Hospital Giessen and to analyze the associated characteristics and impacts on clinical outcomes. A multimodal frailty assessment will be conducted to capture a wide range of frailty features and investigate their significance. The study includes all stroke patients admitted to the certified stroke- unit of the University Hospital Giessen within a 3-month period. There are no inclusion criteria related to age, gender, or type of stroke. The multimodal frailty assessment encompasses determining appropriate blood values (e.g., CRP, albumin), assessing muscle strength/mass through handheld dynamometry and sonographic muscle diameter, utilizing scores like the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and the Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI), evaluating nutritional status (BMI), collecting image-based frailty data (e.g., sarcopenia, cerebral white matter lesions, lacunar strokes, brain atrophy), and conducting suitable one-year follow-ups. Additionally, demographic and clinical data such as age, gender, type of stroke, and treatment details will be recorded. The primary outcome is the prevalence of frailty among stroke patients. Secondary outcomes include the characteristics and impacts of frailty in stroke patients, including correlations between various frailty features and clinical outcomes such as length of hospital stay, mortality, and functional outcome.
Interventions
DIAGNOSTIC_TESTMultimodal frailty assessment
Different domains are assessed during hospital stay, these include: * Clinical scores: Clinical Frailty scale (CFS), Groningen Frailty index (GFI) * Brain frailty: assessing white matter hyperintensieties, atrophy and lacunar strokes in initial brain imaging * Laboratory values: laboratory Frailty index (FI-Lab), inflammatory markers * Nutrition: Controlling nutritional status score (CONUT-score), body mass index, dysphagia assessment (FOIS) * Mobility/strengths: de Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI), grip strenghts of non-paralytic arm via dynamometer, muscle mass estimated by sonographic measurement of the biceps brachii muscle and the rectus femoris muscle.
Sponsors
University of Giessen
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* treated at the certified stroke-unit of the Dpt. of Neurology, University Hospital Giessen * diagnosis of ischemic (including transient ischemic attack) or hemorrhagic stroke
Exclusion criteria
* withdrawal of care within 24 hours after admission
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Prevalence of frailty in stroke patients | 30 days | Percentage of patients with frailty treated for stroke compared to all patients admitted for stroke |
| Rate of good functional outcome | 12 months | Percentage of patients achieving a score of 0 to 2 on the modified Rankin scale (higher values indicating worse outcome, ranging from 0, no deficit, to 6, death) at 12 months follow-up |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mortality rate | From date of admission until death or last follow-up, whichever comes first, assessed up to 12 months. | Rate of death observed during the follow-up period |
| Cognitive outcome | 12 months | Assessment of cognition using the telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment test (tMOCA; ranging from 0 to 22, with a score of 18 or below indicating mild cognitive dysfunction) |
| Patient reported outcome measures (PROM) | 12 months | Health-related quality measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS) of the Euroquol EQ-5D-3L tool. Score ranging from 0 to 100, with higher values indicating better quality of life. |
| Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) | From date of admission until MACE or last follow-up, whichever comes first, assessed up to 12 months. | Rate of patients suffering from newly detected myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke or cardiovascular death |
| Rate of rehospitalization | 12 months | Percentage of patients needed to be hospitalized due to unplanned events during the follow-up |
| Functional impairment in activities of daily living | 12 months | Impairment in activities of daily living measuring the score on the Barthel-Index (BI; ranging from 0 to 100, with higher values indicating less impairment in activities of daily living). |
Countries
Germany
Contacts
Primary ContactStefan Gerner, MD
Backup ContactThorsten Doeppner, MD
Outcome results
None listed