Skip to content

Effects of Intermittent Fasting on Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) Compared to Standard Treatment

Time-restricted Eating as a Novel Approach to PCOS Remission, Compared to Guideline's Standard Hormonal Treatment.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06031753
Enrollment
16
Registered
2023-09-11
Start date
2021-06-03
Completion date
2022-10-11
Last updated
2023-09-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Insulin Resistance, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the effects of Time restricted eating in patients diagnosed with polycystic ovary syndrome, comparing it to the standard hormonal treatment.

Detailed description

After being informed about the study and potential risks, all patients were given a written informed consent. Patients were recruited through social media and digital questionnaires, to make sure they met the criteria. There was a semi aleatory distribution of the patients into three different groups, one group underwent time restricted eating with no hormonal treatment (TRE group), the second group received hormonal treatment combined with time restricted eating (combined group) and the last group received only hormonal treatment (HT). PCOS was diagnosed using Rotterdam criteria, which were evaluated according to the ultrasound, blood samples and self reported menstrual cycle. Blood samples and transvaginal ultrasound were taken at day 0 and 90 to evaluate hormonal status, including insulin and glucose. Homeostatic assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was calculated to determine insulin resistance, as well as metabolic disfunction. After data collection, statistical analyses was done to determine the effect of the different approaches.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALTime restricted eating

Only eating windows were determined to an 6 hour period, starting at 12:00hrs and ending at 18:00hrs. After that, patients in group 1 and 2 were indicated not to consume any calories. The composition of their diet was not modified, it was assessed by performing a 24-hour recall to make sure there were no significant changes in diet composition throughout the study.

Sponsors

Centro Medico ABC
CollaboratorOTHER
Instituto Superior de Investigación en Estética Médica, Nutrición y Anti-Envejecimiento
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

group 1: time restricted eating with NO hormonal treatment group 2: time restricted eating with hormonal treatment group 3: hormonal treatment with NO time restricted eating

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
20 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age: 20 - 35 years * Mild to moderate exercise at least 4 times per week * Body Mass Index (BMI) of 20-24.9 * Diagnosis of PCOS by Rotterdam criteria * Type of oral contraceptives: combined (estrogens and progestins) in group 1 and 2. * PCOS Phenotype A, B, C * nulliparity * Signed informed consent letter

Exclusion criteria

* Menopause or perimenopause * Night work shifts * Phenotype D (without hyperandrogenism) * Associated pathologies such as diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, metabolic syndrome, neoplasms, autoimmune diseases. * Intake of medications on a regular basis, not including oral contraceptives for group 1 and 2.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PCOS Rotterdam criteria3 monthsOvary volume \>9ml, presence of 12 or more follicles, biochemical or clinical signs of hyperandrogenism and anovulation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Insulin resistance (IR)3 monthsHOMA-IR was calculated with insulin and glucose fasting levels to determine the severity of insulin resistance

Countries

Mexico

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026