Skip to content

Effects of Virtual Reality Stabilization Training in Patients With Low Back Pain

The Effects of Virtual Reality Stabilization Training on Postural Stability and Proprioception in Patients With Low Back Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06030960
Acronym
VR
Enrollment
44
Registered
2023-09-11
Start date
2023-10-25
Completion date
2025-05-13
Last updated
2025-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain

Keywords

LBP, Psychological effects, Intervention, Virtual Reality, postural stability, balance, pain, COP

Brief summary

To our knowledge, no studies have better investigated the effect of Core Stabilization Exercises using VR on ankle and trunk proprioception in patients with CLBP and in turn on postural stability.

Detailed description

Background: Low Back Pain (LBP), one of the most critical disability causatives, has been associated with neuromuscular and biomechanical manifestations related to the deficiency of postural control and stability. Virtual reality (VR) core stabilization exercises (CSE) has proven previously to be effective in improving postural control among conditions with different proprioceptive damage mechanisms other than those affected with LBP. The Aim of this study is to explore the differing effects of this treatment regimen on postural stability in relation to lumbar and ankle proprioception in a population of participants with LBP. Design and Methods: a randomized clinical trial encompassing 44 participants of both genders. Participants with Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) will be randomized to one of two treatment groups: an Experimental group receiving VR stabilization exercises and a Control group receiving CSE only without VR simulations inaddition to patient instructions and education of both groups. Parameters of postural stability, ankle and trunk proprioception, pain intensity, balance interference with activity and psychological aspects of pain interference with activity will be measured by a force plate, iPhone applications, visual analog scale (VAS), the Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale, Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) and the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ-Ar) respectively. Outcome measures will be collected at baseline, immediately after 1st treatment and after the last treatment session. Treatment regimens will consist of 12 sessions in 3 weeks using virtual reality glasses. Statistical Analysis: A linear mixed model will be used to analyze within- and between-group differences at the baseline, 6th session and twelfth sessions (repeated measures will be set as GROUP with two levels and TIME with three levels). Bonferroni post-hoc procedures will be used for multiple comparisons of the differences over time. Intention-to-treat analysis shall be utilized. Statistical significance was set at P \< 0.05.

Interventions

Regular Stabilization Exercises

Virtual Reality (VR) Stabilization Exercises

OTHERpatient instructions and education

a unified form of patient instructions and education in regards of LBP

Sponsors

Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
25 Years to 59 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients in Group 1 and Group 2 will be included if they: 1. Are adults between 25 and 59 years of age. 2. Have LBP for longer than 3 months. 3. Are not currently undergoing medication or conservative treatment.

Exclusion criteria

Patients in these two groups will be excluded if they have: 1. Nerve root manifestations (such as referred symptoms of radiating pain below the knee or paresthesia during the straight leg raise test), 2. Systematic or visceral disease, 3. Ankylosing spondylitis, Spondylolysis and Spondylolisthesis, 4. Vestibular dysfunctions, 5. Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2, 6. Lower extremity injury within the past month, 7. Concussion, 8. Psychiatric, cardiovascular or musculoskeletal disorders, 9. Vision problems, 10. Vertebral fracture, 11. Spinal Stenosis, 12. Previous spinal surgery, 13. Present pregnancy, 14. Scoliosis, 15. Inability to understand instructions, read or write (Li et al., 2021).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postural stability12 weeksCentre of Pressure (CoP) movements will be tracked by a multi-sensory platform + Body Weight Balance (static):
Proprioception12 weeksAnkle and Trunk Joint Position Sense (JPS)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Intensity12 weeksVisual Analog Scale (VAS)
Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ-Ar)12 weeksto examine one's beliefs, level of Pain intensity and actual achievements contributions to performance
Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC)12 weeksActive clinical assessment measures of balance and function
Pain Catastrophizing Scale12 weeksOverstressed undesirable perceptions of pain and the ambiance surrounding its involvement

Countries

Saudi Arabia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026