Skip to content

Project HOPES: Healthy Options for Pain and Ending Smoking. A Program for Cancer Survivors.

Project HOPES: Healthy Options for Pain and Ending Smoking. A Program for Cancer Survivors.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06029907
Enrollment
21
Registered
2023-09-08
Start date
2024-07-15
Completion date
2025-08-29
Last updated
2026-08-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain, Smoking Cessation

Keywords

Smoking cessation, Pain management, Cancer survivors

Brief summary

The proposed pilot study will develop and test feasibility, acceptability, and signal for efficacy of a smoking cessation and pain management intervention for 20 cancer survivors.

Detailed description

The proposed pilot study will develop and test feasibility, acceptability, and signal for efficacy of a smoking cessation and pain management intervention for 20 cancer survivors. There are two specific aims: Aim 1: To test the feasibility and acceptability of a behavioral smoking cessation and pain management intervention combined with varenicline. Aim 2: To examine the smoking cessation rate and changes in pain (i.e., severity, interference), self-efficacy (i.e., smoking cessation, pain management), and quality of life from baseline to post-intervention and 3-months post-baseline. The proposed intervention could have a great impact on the health and quality of life of cancer survivors. Teaching pain management techniques coupled with smoking cessation techniques addresses two critical issues for survivors. The study team submitted an R01 based on a prior pilot study. Reviewers were enthusiastic about the significance and innovation of addressing smoking and pain simultaneously. They were, however, not convinced by the potential efficacy of our pilot data. They suggested the study team test the same intervention with varenicline as it can both help promote smoking cessation and provide some analgesia for pain. To address reviewer concerns to lead to R01 funding, the study team proposes to build on our combined behavioral smoking cessation and behavioral pain intervention by adding varenicline. BACKGROUND AND SIGNIFICANCE: The US currently has an estimated 15.5 million cancer survivors. Approximately 10-30% of all cancer survivors are current smokers at diagnosis. Well more than half (70%) of survivors who are current smokers at diagnosis will either resume smoking after an initial quit attempt or continue smoking following their diagnosis. Those who live in rural areas have an even higher rate of smoking. As many as 70% also suffer from pain as well as other physical and/or psychosocial problems. Although some survivors hold beliefs that smoking reduces pain and alleviates distress, in fact, persistent smoking following cancer diagnosis is associated with worse pain, poor quality of life, increased risk for disease recurrence, and worsening of many comorbid medical conditions. Of importance, quitting smoking significantly improves survivors' response to cancer treatment, reduces cancer recurrence, mitigates risk of new cancers and cardiovascular disease and improves quality of life. Thus, helping survivors quit smoking and learn how to manage their pain is a top priority for oncology providers. To date, integration of best practices for promoting smoking cessation and pain management among cancer survivors has received little attention, despite smokers who experience pain reporting lower self-efficacy for quitting and greater expectancies of severe withdrawal and poor cessation outcomes. Building upon our longstanding expertise in smoking cessation and pain management interventions, the study team proposes to build on our pilot work by including a pharmacologic agent that can enhance both cessation and pain management. Among pharmacologic treatments, varenicline (i.e., Chantix) has the strongest evidence for helping people quit smoking. Varenicline also acts on receptors to potentially block pain. The study team submitted an R01, and reviewers wanted stronger pilot data that convinced them more that combining a smoking cessation and pain management intervention would help survivors quit smoking. Thus, in addition to published pilot data the study team have with cancer survivors recruited from the Duke Cancer Network (DCN), the study team proposes to recruit survivors who smoke to test whether the study team can increase our cessation rate by adding varenicline to our behavioral smoking cessation pain management program. In our prior pilot, the study team found promising evidence for the feasibility, acceptability, and signal for efficacy of a combined behavioral smoking cessation with nicotine replacement patches and behavioral pain management intervention. Survivors who received the intervention rated it as useful for smoking cessation and pain management. Survivors who received the intervention were more likely to quit smoking than those in the control arm, but only a few survivors quit. Survivors in the intervention compared to the control arm reported improvements in their pain as well as depression and physical well-being, but again these changes were small. Thus, in this proposed pilot, the study team will examine whether adding varenicline to our behavioral program helps more survivors quit smoking and report better pain management. Our primary outcomes will be feasibility, acceptability, and evidence for potential of future efficacy testing a new combination of behavioral smoking cessation and behavioral pain management + varenicline. Our secondary outcome will be biochemically verified 7-day point prevalence smoking abstinence at 3 months. The study team will also examine pain, self-efficacy (smoking, pain management), and quality of life.

Interventions

OTHERSmoking cessation and pain management intervention

Patients will receive a behavioral smoking cessation and pain management intervention

DRUGVarenicline

Patients will receive varenicline prescribed by their oncologist

Sponsors

Duke University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with cancer at our targeted recruitment sites * Have a diagnosis of cancer within the past 5 years (can be currently undergoing treatment) * Have a life expectancy of at least 1 year * Report pain within the last 3 weeks of 3 or higher on a 10 point scale * Have smoked at least 100 cigarettes in their lifetime * Smoke 5 or more cigarettes per day in the prior 7 days * Be willing to try to quit smoking * Not participating in another smoking cessation trial * Age 18 or older * Speak English

Exclusion criteria

* Hearing impaired * Deemed too sick to participate * Evidence of unstable cognitive or mental health problems who cannot properly provide consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Who Complete the Study6 months post-intervention, specifically at 9 monthsCompleting study participation is the number of those who attend all sessions and complete follow-up surveys. This will serve as the feasibility benchmark.
Number of Participants Who Report That the Intervention Was Helpful6 months post-intervention, specifically at 9 monthsParticipants will be asked if they found the intervention helpful on follow-up surveys. This will serve as the acceptability benchmark.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Validated Cessation6 months post-intervention, specifically at 9 monthsBiochemically verified 7-day point prevalence smoking abstinence with use of CO (carbon monoxide) monitors.
Patient-reported Pain SeverityBaseline, post-treatment (3 months), 6-month follow-upPatients will report their pain on a scale from 0-10 \[0 being "no pain" and 10 being "pain as bad as you can imagine"\] on administered surveys at baseline, post-intervention, and 3-month post-intervention. Study team will look to see if there is a change in patient-reported pain.
Patient-reported Pain InterferenceBaseline, post-treatment (3 months), 6-month follow-upPatients will report how pain is affecting their lives 0-10 \[0 being "does not interfere" and 10 being "completely interferes"\] on administered surveys.
Change in Patient-reported Smoking Cessation Self-efficacyBaseline, post-treatment (3 months), 6-month follow-upPatients will report their ability to stop smoking on administered surveys at baseline, post-intervention, and 6 months post-intervention. Smoking self-efficacy is measured on a scale from 1 to 7 where 1 is "not confident at all" and 7 is "extremely confident". Study team will look to see if there is a change in patient-reported self-efficacy.
Change in Patient-reported Pain Management Self-efficacyBaseline, post-treatment (3 months), 6-month follow-upPatients will report their ability to manage their pain on administered surveys at baseline, post-intervention, and 6 months post-intervention. Pain management self-efficacy is measured on a scale of 1-10 where 1 is "very uncertain, 5 is "moderately uncertain", and 10 is "very uncertain". The total score ranges from 7 to 70, where higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy and confidence in managing daily life with pain.
Change in Patient-reported Quality of Life as Measured by the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS) - AnxietyBaseline, post-intervention (3 months), 6-month follow-upPatients will respond to questions about their perceived quality of life on administered surveys at baseline, 3 months post-intervention, and 6 months post-intervention. Quality of life will be measured based on questions related to Depression/Mood/Negative Affect (Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale - HADS). The Anxiety subscale has a score ranging from 0-21, where higher scores indicate greater symptom severity.
Change in Patient-reported Quality of Life as Measured by the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS) - DepressionBaseline, post-intervention (3 months), 6-month follow-upPatients will respond to questions about their perceived quality of life on administered surveys at baseline, 3 months post-intervention, and 6 months post-intervention. Quality of life will be measured based on questions related to Depression/Mood/Negative Affect (Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale - HADS). The Depression subscale has a score ranging from 0-21, where higher scores indicate greater symptom severity.
Change in Patient-reported Quality of Life as Measured by the Rhode Island Stress and Coping Inventory - CopingBaseline, post-intervention (3 months), 6-month follow-upPatients will respond to questions about their perceived quality of life on administered surveys at baseline, post-intervention, and 6 months post-intervention. Quality of life will be measured based on questions from the Coping subscale of the Rhode Island Stress and Coping Inventory. Patients will answer five questions on scale from 1 = "never" to 5 = "most of the time" and is reported as an average score. Higher scores indicate stronger coping capabilities.
Change in Patient-reported Quality of Life - Physical Well BeingBaseline, post-intervention (3 months), 6-month follow-upPatients will respond to questions about their perceived quality of life on administered surveys at baseline, post-intervention, and 6 months post-intervention. Quality of life will be measured based on questions related to Physical Well Being. Patients will answer questions on a 5-point scale from 0 = "not at all" to 4 = "very much". A higher score indicates worse well being.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORKathryn I Pollak, PhD

Duke University

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Continuous58 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
20 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
American Indian/Alaskan Native
2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Asian
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Black
8 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
White
10 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
21 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex
Female
14 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex
Male
5 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex
Unknown/Not Reported
2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 21
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 21
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 21

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 26, 2026