Skip to content

Comparison of Intubation Conditions During Rapid Sequence Induction Obtained With Modified Time Principal Induction With a Standard Intubation Dose of Rocuronium Versus Succinylcholine

Comparison of Intubation Conditions During Rapid Sequence Induction Obtained With Modified Time Principal Induction With a Standard Intubation Dose of Rocuronium Versus Succinylcholine : A Prospective Non-inferiority Randomized and Blind Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06029049
Enrollment
152
Registered
2023-09-08
Start date
2023-09-13
Completion date
2025-07-01
Last updated
2024-12-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anesthesia

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to assess and compare conditions for tracheal intubation obtained with modified time principal induction with 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium and 1 mg/kg succinylcholine. Specifically, the investigators will be evaluating ease of laryngoscopy, vocal cord view, vocal cord opening, and movement of limbs and coughing during tracheal intubation in order to assess intubation conditions, to compare efficiency and success rate of tracheal intubation between two induction agents and to determine the rate of patient awareness during induction and post-operative recall of paralysis.

Interventions

DRUGModified Time Principle Induction (MTPI) with rocuronium

Participants will be induced using lidocaine 1 mg/kg IV, an opioid such a fentanyl (1-2 mcg/kg) IV, followed by 0.6 mg/kg IV rocuronium, and IV propofol with dosage at the discretion of the care team, administered within 10 seconds of rocuronium and the intubation will be performed with a C-MAC

DRUGRSI succinylcholine

Participants will be induced as per routine care using lidocaine 1 mg/kg IV, an opioid such a fentanyl (1-2 mcg/kg) IV, propofol 1-2 mg/kg IV, and succinylcholine 1mg/kg IV, and the intubation will be performed with a C-MAC

Sponsors

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* BMI \> 30kg/m2 or Mallampati class III or IV. * Requiring general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation

Exclusion criteria

* Acute and chronic respiratory disorders, including Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD) and asthma. * The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification \> III. * Patients requiring awake intubation. * Pregnant women. * Untreated ischemic heart disease. * Patients requiring an induction dose of propofol \< 1 mg/kg. * Allergy to propofol, rocuronium, succinylcholine, or sugammadex. * Patients with renal failure and unknown potassium (K+) level, or patients with K+ level \> 5.0 * Personal history of malignant hyperthermia (MH), or family history of MH * Patients with suspected or diagnosed neuromuscular disease, patients with burn injuries

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ease of laryngoscopyDuring procedure (Between laryngoscope insertion to onset of ventilation (less than 7 minutes))Ease of laryngoscopy is scored categorically as easy (Jaw relaxed, no resistance to blade during laryngoscopy) , fair (Jaw not fully relaxed, some resistance to blade) or difficult (Poor jaw relaxation, active resistance by patient to laryngoscopy)
Position of vocal cordsDuring procedure (Between laryngoscope insertion to onset of ventilation (less than 7 minutes))Position of vocal cords is scored categorically as abducted, intermediate or closed
Movement of vocal cordsDuring procedure (Between laryngoscope insertion to onset of ventilation (less than 7 minutes))Movement of vocal cords is scored categorically as none , moving or closing
Number of participants who moved their limbs during intubationDuring procedure (Between laryngoscope insertion to onset of ventilation (less than 7 minutes))none, slight or vigorous
number of participants who coughed during tracheal intubationDuring procedure (Between laryngoscope insertion to onset of ventilation (less than 7 minutes))none, diaphragm or sustained (\>10s)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Heart Ratefrom the start of induction drug administration to about 5 minutes after successful ventilation
Diastolic Blood Pressurefrom the start of induction drug administration to about 5 minutes after successful ventilation
Systolic Blood Pressurefrom the start of induction drug administration to about 5 minutes after successful ventilation
End-tidal carbon dioxide (CO2)from the start of induction drug administration to about 5 minutes after successful ventilation
Oxygen saturation (SpO2)from the start of induction drug administration to about 5 minutes after successful ventilation
Number of participants that had injury associated with intubationwithin 24 hours after surgeryInjury is defined as injury to dentition, lips, tongue, and pharyngeal bleeding.
Number of participants for whom tracheal intubations failedAfter 3 failed intubation attempts (less than 7 minutes from start of intubation)
Number of participants who had presence of sore throat as assessed by the score on the Post Anesthesia Care Unit Survey of Modified Time Principle Inductionwithin 24 hours after surgeryThis is scored from 0(no pain) to 10(worst pain)
Number of participants who had nausea as assessed by the score on the Post Anesthesia Care Unit Survey of Modified Time Principle Inductionwithin 24 hours after surgery
Number of participants who had vomiting as assessed by the score on the Post Anesthesia Care Unit Survey of Modified Time Principle Inductionwithin 24 hours after surgery
Overall patient satisfaction as assessed by the score on the Post Anesthesia Care Unit Survey of Modified Time Principle Inductionwithin 24 hours after surgeryThis is scored from 0(not satisfied) to 10(extremely satisfied)
Number of participants who had recollection of pain on inductionwithin 24 hours after surgery
Number of participants with muscle paralysis awareness prior to loss of consciousness as assessed by the Post Anesthesia Care Unit Survey of Modified Time Principle Inductionwithin 24 hours after surgery
Number of times tracheal intubations are attempted5 minutes after intubation and successful ventilation
Number of participants for whom tracheal intubations were successful on the first attempt5 minutes after intubation and successful ventilation
Airway view at the time of laryngoscopy as categorized by the modified Cormack-Lehane classification (before external manipulation)from start of induction to 5 minutes of successful ventilationData is reported categorically as follows 1(Full view of glottis),2a(Partial view of glottis), 2b(Only posterior extremity of glottis seen or only arytenoid cartilages), 3(Only epiglottis seen, none of glottis seen) and 4(Neither glottis nor epiglottis seen)
Satisfaction of providers with intubating conditionsfrom 5 minutes of successful ventilationProviders will answer yes or no for satisfaction

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactLauren M Nakazawa, MD,MBA
Lauren.M.Nakazawa@uth.tmc.edu713-500-6775
Backup ContactEllie Tuchaai
Ellie.J.Tuchaai@uth.tmc.edu713.614.9355

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026