Skip to content

Comparing the Efficacy of Metronidazole and Minocycline Gels for the Treatment of Diabetic Periodontitis Patients

Comparing the Efficacy of Metronidazole and Minocycline Gels for the Treatment of Diabetic Periodontitis Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06027151
Enrollment
380
Registered
2023-09-07
Start date
2022-10-06
Completion date
2023-07-31
Last updated
2025-10-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Periodontitis

Keywords

Chronic periodontitis, Minocycline gel, Scaling and root planning, Metronidazole gel, Efficacy of local administration, Diabetes mellitus

Brief summary

This clinical study randomized 380 diabetic chronic periodontitis patients into 4 groups: scaling and root planning alone (group I), scaling and root planning plus metronidazole gel (group II), scaling and root planning plus minocycline gel (group III), and scaling and root planning plus both metronidazole and minocycline gels (group IV). Periodontal measurements including probing depth, gingival color and texture, bleeding on probing, clinical attachment level, and recession were recorded at baseline, 7 days, and 15 days.

Detailed description

It was a clinical trial with four arms. The research was carried out at the Pharmacology Department, IIMC Riphah University, Rawalpindi. The sample size was calculated to be 380 using the prevalence of disease, z-score, and 5% margin of error. Written informed consent was obtained from the participants. The patients being treated for chronic periodontitis were randomly divided into four groups (I, II, III, and IV). Patients in Group I were subjected to Scaling and root planning alone. Group II patients were given metronidazole gel following Scaling and root planning. Minocycline gel was locally applied subsequent to scaling and root planning in Group III patients. The combination of metronidazole gel and minocycline gel was administered after Scaling and root planning in Group IV patients. Scaling and root planning of all the patients was done. Periodontal probing depth, the color of the gingiva, texture of the gingiva, bleeding on probing, clinical attachment level, and recession were recorded for each patient at baseline visit, after 7 days, and after 15 days to determine and compare the efficacy of local administration of drugs.

Interventions

DRUG1ml of 1% metronidazole gel

Subgingivally at baseline visit

DRUG1ml of 2% minocycline gel

sub gingivally at baseline visit

DRUG1ml of combination of 1% metronidazole gel and 2% minocycline

subgingivally at baseline visit

Sponsors

Riphah International University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

single blind, patient was unaware of which drug they were administered. It was done by covering the syringes with colored tapes

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Previously diagnosed diabetic patients on either hypoglycemics or insulin therapy suffering from periodontitis

Exclusion criteria

Pregnant or nursing mothers Patients with gestational diabetes Alcoholics Patients under any anti-inflammatory or antibiotic drugs (daily for ˃7 consecutive days) within the last two months of elimination before entering the study. Known allergy to minocycline, or metronidazole. Periodontal surgeries in the past Smoking

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PERIODONTAL POCKET DEPTH (PPD)15 daysPeriodontal pocket depth was measured in mm using a WHO (CPITN) periodontal probe. Baseline periodontal probing depth was measured before application of drug. It was remeasured on 7th day and 15th day. Reduction in probing depth indicates improvement on follow up visits.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
COLOR OF GINGIVA15 daysColor of gingiva is observed at baseline visit, on 7th day and 15th day. Healthy gingiva is coral pink in color while diseased gingiva is erythematous cyanotic.
TEXTURE OF GINGIVA15 daysTexture of gingiva is observed at baseline visit, on 7th day and 15th day. Healthy gingiva is matte and stippled. Diseased gingiva is smooth and shiny.
BLEEDING ON PROBING (BOP)15 daysIt was determined whether the site was bleeding on probing or not. Bleeding on probing is observed on the baseline visit, 7th day, and 15th day. If the gingiva is not bleeding then it is considered as normal.
CLINICAL ATTACHMENT Level15 daysDistance from cementoenamel junction to depth of pocket is measured with the help of CPITN probe. Readings are taken on baseline visit, 7th day and 15th day. Severity index is as follows. Healthy gingiva- 0mm CAL Mild: 1- or 2-mm CAL Moderate: 3- or 4-mm CAL Severe: ≥ 5mm CAL
RECESIION OF GINGIVAL MARGIN:15 daysRecession is measured from CEJ to margin of gingiva with the help of CPITN probe on baseline visit, 7th day and 15th day. Severity of disease is assessed as follows CLASS I: Marginal tissue recession that does not extend to the mucogingival junction. There is no loss of bone or soft tissue in the interdental area. This can be narrow or wide. CLASS II: Marginal tissue recession that extends to or beyond the mucogingival junction. There is no loss of bone or soft tissue in the interdental area. This can be narrow or wide. CLASS III: Marginal tissue recession that extends to or beyond the mucogingival junction. In addition, there is loss of bone and/or soft tissue in the interdental area or there is malpositioning of the tooth. CLASS IV: Marginal tissue recession that extends to or beyond the mucogingival junction with severe loss of bone and soft tissue interdentally and/or severe malpositioning of the tooth.

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026