Skip to content

Long Term Effects of Action Observation Therapy and Mirror Therapy on Upper Limb Functions

Long Term Effects of Action Observation Therapy and Mirror Therapy on Upper Limb Functional and Fine Motor Outcomes After Subacute Stroke

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06027125
Enrollment
44
Registered
2023-09-07
Start date
2023-04-01
Completion date
2024-02-15
Last updated
2025-11-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Keywords

Action observation therapy , Mirror therapy

Brief summary

There will be a long term effects of action observation therapy and mirror therapy on upper limb functional outcomes after subacute stroke.

Detailed description

However, no study is conducted to check the retention rate of both therapies. My study will check the retention rate of these interventions in stroke. If we are able to know long lasting effects of this particular regime, we can incorporate this cost-effective intervention into our clinical setups for stroke rehabilitation.

Interventions

OTHERAction observation Therapy

The patients in the AOT group will be required to observe the upper limb movements or functional actions in video clips and to execute what they had observed to the best of their ability.

OTHERMirror Therapy

The patients will be seated in front of a mirror box placed at their midsagittal plane to perform the movements. The affected arm of the participants was placed inside of the mirror box, and the unaffected arm was infront ofthe mirror.

Sponsors

Riphah International University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Both male and female * 1 to 6 months since unilateral stroke onset * Age between 40 and 70 years. * Baseline score of the FMA motor score between 20 and 40 * Ability to follow the study instructions according to Montreal cognitive scale and score should be \>24.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with depression who will be unable to cooperate during treatment and Cardiopulmonary diseases which could hinder their ability to participate in rehabilitation * Visual and auditory abnormalities * Major medical problems or comorbidities that influenced the usage of the upper limbs or caused severe pain.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fugel Meyer assessment of upper limb4,5,6,7,8 weekA three-point ordinal scale is used to measure impairments of volitional movement with grades ranging from 0 (item cannot be performed) to 2 (item can be fully performed). Specific descriptions for performance accompany individual test items. Subtests exist for UE function, LE function, balance, sensation, ROM, and pain. The cumulative test score for all components is 226 with availability of specific subtest scores (e.g., UE maximum score is 66, LE score 34; balance score 14). This instrument has good construct validity and high reliability (r =0.99) for determining motor function and balance. Quantifiable outcome data allow this instrument to be accurately used for research purposes (a gold standard) and document recovery over time. The instrument requires an estimated 30 to 40 minutes to administer.
Functional Independence Measure4,5,6,7,8 weekThe FIM instrumentIncludes measures of independence for self-care, including sphincter control, transfers, locomotion, communication, and social cognition. Is an 18-item, seven-level, ordinal scale intended to be sensitive to changes over the course of a comprehensive inpatient medical rehabilitation program.
Short form of the Stroke Impact Scale (SF-SIS)4,5,6,7,8 weekThe eight items determined from the SIS 3.0 for the SF-SIS by MacIsaac et al.For this reason, we refrained from a renewed process of translation and intercultural adaptation of these eight questions. As with the SIS 2.0, the rating is based on a 5-point Likert scale (1-5 points). The raw sum score of the eight questions with a range from 8 to 40 points is converted into an interval-scaled total index of 0-100 points, the SF-SIS index. Higher scores indicate a better quality of life.
Wolf motor function test4,5,6,7,8 weekThe Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) quantifies upper extremity movement ability through timed single- or multiple-joint motions and functional tasks.1 The tasks are arranged in order of complexity, progress from proximal to distal joint involvement, test total extremity movement and movement speed, and require few tools and minimal training for test execution. The present study establishes the reliability and validity of the WMFT (Assessing Wolf Motor Function Test as Outcome Measure for Research in Patients After Stroke.) The original version consisted of 21 items; the widely used version of the WMFT consists of 17 items Composed of 3 parts: * Time * Functional ability * Strength

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026