Skip to content

Safely Reduce Cystoscopic Evaluations for Hematuria Patients

Safely Reduce Cystoscopic Evaluations for Hematuria Patients

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06026189
Acronym
SeARCH
Enrollment
1100
Registered
2023-09-06
Start date
2023-05-31
Completion date
2027-05-31
Last updated
2023-09-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bladder Cancer, Hematuria, Urothelial Carcinoma, Urothelial Neoplasm

Keywords

Urinary biomarker, Hematuria, Urothelial Carcinoma, Bladder Cancer

Brief summary

The SeARCH-trial assess the clinical impact of a molecular urine test as a 'urine-first' strategy in the diagnostic workup of patients presenting with microscopic hematuria.

Detailed description

Microscopic hematuria (MH) can be a sign of an underlying disease, including malignancy of the urinary tract, and is reason for referral to a urology clinic. The current standard diagnostic workup for MH patients includes visual inspection of the bladder by cystoscopy and upper tract imaging to rule out the presence of a tumor in the urinary tract. However, the a priori risk of cancer in patients with MH is only 2-5%. Consequently, 95% of MH patients unnecessarily undergo invasive procedures, which are: I) uncomfortable and stressful for patients, II) has a significant impact on limited available (financial) resources and III) a CT scan is accompanied by exposure to ionizing radiation. Previously we developed a molecular urine assay to detect urinary tract cancer in hematuria patients that had robust diagnostic performance; a negative predictive value \>99%, sensitivity, and specificity \>90%. The SeARCH-trial evaluates the clinical impact of a urine assay as a 'urine-first' strategy, meaning that only patients with an abnormal urine test results undergo invasive diagnostics. In this multicenter stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial we compare clinical outcomes by using a 'urine-first' strategy to 'care-as-usual', which is a cystoscopy and upper tract imaging in all patients presenting with MH. In addition, we assess patients' preferences, patients reported outcome measurements, and healthcare costs to show that a 'urine-first' strategy improves patients' quality of life and results in a more appropriate use of limited available resources.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTurine-first strategy

Only patients with an abnormal urine test result undergo a diagnostic workup, i.e. cystoscopy and upper-tract imaging.

Sponsors

Erasmus Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Masking description

This is a stepped wedge cluster randomized clinical trial

Intervention model description

A multicenter, stepped wedge cluster randomized trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Microscopically confirmed microscopic hematuria of voided urine defined as ≥3 erythrocytes per high power field * Male patients ≥40 years * Female patients ≥50 years

Exclusion criteria

* History of urothelial bladder- or urinary tract cancer * Presence of macroscopic (visible) hematuria * Woman who is or may be pregnant

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The primary aim of the SeARCH-trial is to assess the clinical impact of implementing a molecular urinary assay as a 'urine-first' strategy, in the diagnostic workup of patients presenting with microscopic hematuria.1 yearThe net benefit is defined as the proportion of patients who were diagnose with urinary tract cancer within 1 year after initial diagnostic work-up in the population (true positives) subtracted by the proportion of patients that underwent diagnostic evaluations without an abnormal finding (false positives). The latter is multiplied by the decision threshold, which represents the estimated harms of the diagnostic intervention, such as patients' burden and use of available resources, against the harms of an outcome event, i.e. missing a urinary tract tumor.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The number of cystoscopies and upper tract imaging modalities (CT or ultrasound) when using a 'urine-first' strategy versus 'care-as-usual'1 year
Cost-effectiveness analysisQuestionnaires are administered at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months.This will be performed according to the Dutch guideline by administering validated questionnaires.
Patient reported outcome measurements (PROMs)Questionnaires are administered at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months.Patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) are assessed for patients undergoing cystoscopy and urine collection.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026