Skip to content

Predicting Functional Outcome and Response to Therapy of Anti-NMDAR Encephalitis at Diagnosis

Predicting Functional Outcome and Response to Therapy of Anti-NMDAR Encephalitis at Diagnosis: The NEOSII Score

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06023160
Acronym
NEOSII
Enrollment
714
Registered
2023-09-05
Start date
2020-12-01
Completion date
2024-07-01
Last updated
2025-03-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anti-NMDA (N-Methyl D-Aspartate) Receptor Encephalitis

Keywords

Prognosis, Immunotherapy

Brief summary

The goal of this international cohort study is to develop a prediction model for long-term outcome and response to first-line immunotherapy of anti-NMDAR Encephalitis, already at the moment of diagnosis.

Detailed description

Anti-NMDARE is a severe, but treatable neurological condition, with considerable and variable long-term disability. The previously developed anti-NMDAR Encephalitis One-Year Functional Status (NEOS) score predicts outcome a month into treatment. To predict outcome and response to immunotherapy at the time of diagnosis would be a serious improvement. This would timely identify patients in need for aggressive treatment and avoid harmful side-effects in those with good outcome. International data from five anti-NMDAR encephalitis cohorts will be combined to attain these goals. The investigators strive to have less than 10% missing data on all variables and will impute data were needed. The datasets will then be split - with equal distributions of cohorts and good/poor outcome - to develop (70%) and validate (30%) the NEOS2 model. The primary outcome is functioning one year after diagnosis. A secondary analysis is targeted to predict the effect of first-line therapy. Potentially relevant predictive variables are identified with a univariable analysis on the original data, confirmed with backwards selection on the imputed datasets. After checking for multicollinearity and linearity of the variables, identified variables are added to a mixed effects logistic regression model on the original and imputed datasets, to identify the final set of predictive variables. To make the models opportune for daily medical practice, the investigators will assign points to (categories of) the included variables, based on the coefficients.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Erasmus Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosed with anti-NMDAR encephalitis (according to the Graus criteria)

Exclusion criteria

* Preceding Herpes Simplex encephalitis * Premorbid dependency (modified Rankin Scale \> 2)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Functional status one year after diagnosis, on the modified Rankin Scale.One year after diagnosisThe score on the modified Rankin Scale will be applied as the original ordinal scale as well as dichotomized, where scores 0-2 represent independent functioning (without or with symptoms) and scores 3-6 increasing levels of depencency

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Response to first-line immunotherapyTwo weeks after administration of first-line immunotherapyOne point improvement (one point lower than at diagnosis) on the modified Rankin Scale (ranging from 0 - no symptoms - to 6 - deceased - as the most severe category) within two weeks from therapy commencement.
Return to school or workThroughout follow-up time after diagnosis (different per patient, depending on date of diagnosis). Average 3 years (min 0 - max 22 years)Time-to-event analysis on the ability to return to school or work during follow-up, including timing of resumption of work after diagnosis.
Relapse rateThroughout follow-up time after diagnosis (different per patient, depending on date of diagnosis). Average 3 years (min 0 - max 22 years)Time-to-event analysis on relapses during total available follow-up time, including time of relapse after diagnosis.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026