Pneumothorax
Conditions
Keywords
Pneumothorax, Lung Ultrasound, Chest X-Ray, Trauma patients, Cardiac Surgery, Chest Drain Removal
Brief summary
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center annually provides assistance to approximately 600 cardiac surgeries and 1500 trauma patients, many of whom require chest tubes to prevent blood and fluids from accumulating in the pleural cavities surrounding the heart. During the removal of chest tubes, there is a risk of air leaking into these cavities, leading to pneumothorax, a critical condition occurring in approximately 5-26% of cases, associated with increased complications and mortality. Currently, the diagnosis of pneumothorax is primarily based on chest X-rays (CXR), despite their limitations and low reliability. As an alternative method, lung ultrasound (LUS) offers several advantages: it is safer, less expensive, and less painful for patients compared to CXR. However, there is a lack of comparative data on the accuracy and interrater reliability of these two diagnostic approaches after chest tube removal. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of lung ultrasound performed by medical trainees in diagnosing pneumothorax in cardiac and trauma patients. By comparing LUS to CXR, the investigators seek to determine if LUS provides a more reliable and precise diagnosis. This study has the potential to enhance patient care by establishing a more effective and accessible method for diagnosing pneumothorax post-chest tube removal.
Detailed description
Diagnosing and promptly treating pneumothorax (PNX) is critical, as it is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and hospital stay for patients. Following cardiac surgery, timely identification of PNX is particularly vital due to patients' reduced cardiopulmonary reserve, which can rapidly lead to life-threatening situations. While computed tomography (CT) is highly accurate in diagnosing PNX, its routine use for screening is impractical due to high radiation exposure, cost, and limited availability. Currently, the standard method for PNX detection is chest X-ray (CXR), but its reliability is suboptimal, resulting in potential misdiagnoses and delays in patient care. An alternate method for detecting PNX is using lung ultrasound (LUS). LUS is safe, portable compared to CXR, has the potential for faster results and higher accuracy relative to CXR. LUS can also be carried out by appropriate trained nurses and medical trainees, instead of requiring an expert radiographer. This prospective, single-center, observational, cross-sectional, cohort, feasibility pilot trial assesses trainee-performed bedside lung ultrasound (LUS) for detecting PNX and testing feasibility for a multicenter observational prospective study. The investigators will also compare PNX detection using LUS by novices compared to experts, interrater reliability and the time required from chest/mediastinal tube removal to diagnostic report for LUS. All participants will undergo assessment for PNX using both LUS and CXR completed independently (by study-trained critical care nurse/surgical trainee or an expert radiologist, respectively) and results will be compared between the two modalities. The successful implementation of LUS could lead to streamlined patient care and improved outcomes for cardiac surgery and trauma patients.
Interventions
DIAGNOSTIC_TESTLung ultrasound to detect pneumothorax.
Within a maximum of two hours after chest tube removal, the sonographic exam will be performed with an ultrasound device to assess residual PNX using a portable ultrasound device. The examination will require patients to lie face upward and will be performed at three different sites on both sides of the patient's chest. Each chest site will be imaged for approximately 10-20 seconds, allowing a complete examination of each side in approximately 30-60 seconds. The total study time for the LUS exam is approximately 2 minutes. The results of this assessment will be compared to the standard chest x-ray performed by a radiologist who is unaware of the study.
Sponsors
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
Single-group study where the focus is on evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of both CXR and LUS for PNX detection post-tube removal in cardiac surgery and trauma patients. The study aims to compare the results of both modalities within the same group of participants to assess their performance in detecting PNX.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Age ≥ 18 years old. * Cardiac and trauma patients who have had a chest/mediastinal tube removed within the past two hours in the CVICU, trauma bay, or ward.
Exclusion criteria
* Patients who had a PNX prior to mediastinal chest tube removal that required intervention. * Patients on mechanical ventilation. * Patients with subcutaneous emphysema due to impaired pleural line visualization.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Recruitment rate | 12 months (full pilot trial) | The total number of participants recruited during the pilot trial. Target: 60 participants. |
| Adherence to LUS Scan Protocol | 12 months (full pilot trial) | The proportion of participants who receive the LUS scans as per the trial protocol. This will be assessed by checking the frequency of LUS scans conducted for each participant against the planned frequency in the protocol. Measurement Tool: Frequency count of LUS scans against planned protocol scans. |
| Feasibility of Accurate LUS Data Collection for Comparison with Chest X-rays | 12 months (full pilot trial) | Evaluate the feasibility of obtaining accurate LUS data suitable for comparison against Chest X-rays. The accuracy of LUS scans will be determined by the clarity and consistency of recorded data points. For the purpose of this study, 'accuracy' will be defined by a set of criteria based on sonographic signs of pneumothorax that include: absence of lung sliding, absence of B lines, presence of lung point, and absence of lung pulse. The primary outcome will be the proportion of LUS scans that meet this accuracy threshold. Measurement Tool: Qualitative assessment criteria tailored for this study. LUS scans will be evaluated based on clarity, consistency of recorded data points, and adherence to the sonographic signs of pneumothorax as listed above. The results from LUS will then be prepared for comparison against Chest X-ray findings in subsequent analyses. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Interrater reliability | 12 months (full pilot trial) | Assess the interrater reliability of novice and expert sonographers. |
| Compare novice-performed LUS with CXR reports performed by experienced radiologists. | 12 months (full pilot trial) | The results of the assessments will be analyzed to determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of pneumothorax detection by novices compared to experts. |
| Time Required | 12 months (full pilot trial) | Assess the time required from chest/mediastinal tube removal to diagnostic report for LUS vs CXR. |
| Diagnostic accuracy of LUS vs CXR | 12 months (full pilot trial) | Assess diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity of PNX detection by CXR and LUS (80% interrater reliability with the results when LUS is adjudicated by an expert for detecting PNX post-chest/mediastinal tube removal). |
| Diagnostic Sensitivity of CXR vs LUS | 12 months (full pilot trial) | Assess diagnostic sensitivity of PNX detection by CXR and LUS (80% interrater reliability with the results when LUS is adjudicated by an expert for detecting PNX post-chest/mediastinal tube removal). |
Countries
Canada
Outcome results
None listed