Skip to content

An Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability Study of Veligrotug (VRDN-001), in Participants With Chronic Thyroid Eye Disease (TED)

A Randomized, Double-masked, Placebo-controlled Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy Study of VRDN-001, a Humanized Monoclonal Antibody Directed Against the IGF-1 Receptor, in Participants With Chronic Thyroid Eye Disease (TED)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06021054
Acronym
THRIVE-2
Enrollment
188
Registered
2023-09-01
Start date
2023-11-01
Completion date
2025-07-25
Last updated
2026-08-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Thyroid Eye Disease

Keywords

Thyroid Eye Disease, Thyroid-Associated Ophthalmopathy, Dysthyroid Ophthalmopathy, Graves Eye Disease, Graves Orbitopathy, Myopathic Ophthalmopathy, Congestive Ophthalmopathy, Edematous Ophthalmopathy, Infiltrative Ophthalmopathy, TED, Thyroid-Associated Orbitopathy, Graves Disease

Brief summary

This is a clinical trial assessing the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of an investigational drug, veligrotug (VRDN-001), in participants with chronic thyroid eye disease (TED).

Detailed description

This is a randomized (meaning participants will be assigned to study arms by chance), double-masked (meaning study doctor and participant will not know which study arm participant is assigned to), placebo-controlled study that will include participants with chronic TED. The key objectives of this study are to determine if veligrotug (VRDN-001) is efficacious, safe, and tolerable when administered as 5 IV infusions given every 3 weeks for a total of 12 weeks in participants with chronic TED.

Interventions

5 IV Infusions of veligrotug 10 mg/kg

DRUGPlacebo

5 IV Infusions of veligrotug matched placebo

Sponsors

Viridian Therapeutics, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Must have moderate to severe chronic TED with documented evidence of ocular symptoms or signs that began greater than 15 months prior to screening * Must have had a clinical diagnosis of TED, with any CAS (0-7) * Must agree to use highly effective contraception as specified in the protocol * Female TED participants must have a negative serum pregnancy test at screening Key

Exclusion criteria

* Must not have received prior treatment with another anti-IGF-1R therapy * Must not have received systemic corticosteroids for any condition, including TED, or selenium within 2 weeks prior to first dose * Must not have received other immunosuppressive drugs or another investigational agent for any condition, including TED, or any other therapy for TED, within 8 weeks prior to first dose * Must not have received radioactive iodine (RAI) treatment within 8 weeks prior to first dose * Must not have a pre-existing ophthalmic condition in the study eye that in the opinion of the study doctor would confound interpretation of the study results * Must not have had previous orbital irradiation or decompression surgery for TED to the study eye's orbit * Must not have inflammatory bowel disease * Must not have abnormal baseline audiometry Pure Tone Average (PTA) assessment or history of significant (as determined by the Investigator) ear pathology, relevant ear surgery or hearing loss. * Female TED participants must not be pregnant or lactating

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proptosis Responder Rate (PRR) in the Most Proptotic Eye as Measured by ExophthalmometerBaseline to Week 15Proptosis response in the most proptotic eye was defined as a reduction of proptosis of ≥2 millimeters (mm) from baseline in the most proptotic eye (without a corresponding increase of ≥2 mm in the other eye) as measured by exophthalmometer. Missing data were imputed with the Multiple Imputation (MI) method.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Proptosis in the Most Proptotic Eye as Measured by ExophthalmometerBaseline, Week 15Proptosis was defined as distance between the lateral orbital rim and the most anterior position of the cornea in mm, measured using an exophthalmometer. Missing data were imputed with the MI method.
PRR in the Most Proptotic Eye, as Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)/Computed Tomography (CT)Baseline to Week 15Proptosis responder in the most proptotic eye by MRI/CT was defined as a reduction of proptosis of ≥2 mm from baseline in the most proptotic eye by MRI/CT (without a corresponding increase of ≥2 mm in the other eye) as measured by MRI/CT. Missing data were imputed using the Exophthalmometer Imputation (EXI) method, as applicable.
Change From Baseline in Proptosis in the Most Proptotic Eye as Measured by MRI/CTBaseline, Week 15Measurement of proptosis was conducted by the central imaging reading center using MRI/CT of the orbits acquired without contrast. Measurements were conducted by 2 independent readers with adjudication if the difference between the 2 primary readers in proptosis measurement exceeded 5% (calculated as the difference divided by the larger measurement). The average of 2 (or 3 if adjudicated) measurements were used for analyses. Missing data were imputed using the EXI method, as applicable.
Clinical Activity Responder Rate in the Most Proptotic Eye as Measured by ExophthalmometerWeek 15Clinical activity responder in the most proptotic eye was defined as no worsening in clinical activity score (CAS) from baseline in the most proptotic eye without a corresponding increase of ≥2 points in the other eye. Missing data were imputed with the MI method.
Overall Responder Rate (ORR) Comprising PRR and Clinical Activity Responder Rate in the Most Proptotic Eye as Measured by ExophthalmometerBaseline to Week 15ORR was comprised of PRR in the most proptotic eye (reduction of proptosis of ≥2 mm from baseline in the most proptotic eye \[without a corresponding increase of ≥2 mm in the other eye\]) as measured by exophthalmometer at Week 15 and Clinical Activity Responder rate in the most proptotic eye (no worsening in CAS from baseline in the most proptotic eye without a corresponding increase of ≥2 points in the other eye) as measured by exophthalmometer at Week 15. Missing data were imputed with the MI method.
Diplopia Responder RateWeek 15A diplopia responder was defined as having a decrease of ≥1 from baseline for participants with a baseline Gorman subjective diplopia score \>0. Gorman subjective diplopia score (range, 0 to 3) includes 4 categories: no diplopia (absent, scored as 0), diplopia in the primary position of gaze when the participant is tired or awakening (intermittent, scored as 1), diplopia at extremes of gaze (inconstant, scored as 2), and continuous diplopia in the primary or reading position (constant, scored as 3). Missing data were imputed with the MI method.
Diplopia Resolution RateWeek 15Diplopia resolution was defined as reduction in Gorman subjective diplopia score to 0 from baseline for participants with baseline Gorman subjective diplopia score \>0. Gorman subjective diplopia score (range, 0 to 3) includes 4 categories: no diplopia (absent, scored as 0), diplopia in the primary position of gaze when the participant is tired or awakening (intermittent, scored as 1), diplopia at extremes of gaze (inconstant, scored as 2), and continuous diplopia in the primary or reading position (constant, scored as 3). Missing data were imputed with the MI method.

Countries

Australia, France, Germany, Hungary, Poland, Spain, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

As prespecified, data were collected and reported for the participants. Therefore, the 'Ns' reported below = number of participants analyzed regardless of which eye was evaluated. The primary and secondary efficacy analyses and safety analysis were measured in the pre-specified study eye per individual participant.

Pre-assignment details

Ocular assessments were performed in both eyes at baseline. Study eye was the most proptotic eye by exophthalmometer at baseline. If both eyes were equally proptotic, then the eye with the worse visual acuity (VA) was designated as the study eye. If proptosis and VA were equal in both eyes, then the right eye was designated as the study eye.

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Continuous50.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.03
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Hispanic or Latino
15 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Missing
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Not Hispanic or Latino
46 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Not Reported
10 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Unknown
2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Asian
3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Black or African American
19 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Missing
5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Multiple
2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Not Reported
6 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Other
5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Unknown
0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
White
94 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
95 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
30 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 1250 / 63
other
Total, other adverse events
87 / 12522 / 63
serious
Total, serious adverse events
10 / 1253 / 63

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 14, 2026