Suicidal Ideation
Conditions
Keywords
suicidal ideation,, self-harm, older adult, elderly, ECMAP, Pakistan, LMIC
Brief summary
determine the efficacy of culturally adapted manual assisted brief psychological intervention for older adults (E-CMAP) with suicidal ideation
Detailed description
Suicide is a serious public health concern. Each year more than 800,000 people worldwide die due to suicide. Most of these (79%) are in the low and middle-income countries (LMIC), with an increased risk of suicide in ageing. Primary Objective: To assess the effectiveness of E-CMAP compared to Treatment as Usual (TAU) as measured by reduction in suicidal ideation third month post-randomization with Beck Scale for Suicidal ideation (BSI) (Beck & Steer, 1991) Secondary outcomes: the two groups will be compared on hopelessness, depression, quality of life, coping skills, participant satisfaction, health/social care usage, and episodes of self-harm. All variables known to be related to suicide risk. The study will be carried out in two stages. First stage will be cultural adaptation and refinement of the intervention and second stage will be feasibility Randomised Control Trial (RCT). Stage 1: In the first stage, the adaptation of the intervention for suicidal ideation in older adults will be carried out by a group of experts including a master trainer, a bilingual health expert, mental health professional potential user (i.e., older adults with suicidal ideation), and a senior therapist through discussion groups. Stage 2: Feasibility randomized controlled trial (RCT) After adaptation, the intervention will be tested in a multicenter RCT to determine the efficacy of culturally adapted manual assisted brief psychological intervention for older adults/elderly (E-CMAP) with suicidal ideation.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALECMAP
The therapist will deliver 12-week training program comprised of 6 sessions at the participant's home/outpatient clinic depending upon the participants' choice within 3 months. The first two sessions will be offered weekly and then fortnightly.
Sponsors
Pakistan Institute of Living and Learning
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
In the context of this study, suicidal ideation is defined as; Passive thoughts about wanting to be dead or active thoughts about killing oneself, these thoughts may include plan but not accompanied by preparatory behavior (Griffin et al., 2020) * 50 years and above * Has recent history of experiencing suicidal ideation * Participants living within the catchment area of the participating practices and hospitals. * Capacity to give informed consent.
Exclusion criteria
* Unable to provide consent due to severe mental or physical illness. * Unlikely to be available for outcome assessments (temporary residence)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Suicidal Ideation | change in total scores from baseline to 3-month post randomization assessment | Participants suicidal ideation will be assessed using the Beck scale for suicidal ideation. Higher scores on the questionnaire indicate greater severity of suicidal ideation. Scores provide a measure of the severity of self-reported hopelessness: 0-3 minimal, 4-8 mild, 9-14 moderate, and 15-20 severe. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Depression | change in total scores from baseline to 3-month post randomization assessment | Participants severity of depression will be assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory. Higher scores indicate greater severity of depression. Total score of 0-13 is considered minimal range, 14-19 is mild, 20-28 is moderate, and 29-63 is severe. |
| Health-related Quality of Life | change in total scores from baseline to 3-month post randomization assessment | Participants Health related quality of life will be assessed using the EQ-5D- 5L. Higher scores indicate better health related quality of life |
| Coping Resource Inventory | change in total scores from baseline to 3-month post randomization assessment | Participants coping skills will be assessed using the Coping Resource Inventory. Higher scored indicate better coping skills. |
| Hopelessness | change in total scores from baseline to 3-month post randomization assessment | Participants feelings of hopelessness will be assessed using the Beck Hopelessness Scale. Higher scores indicate greater severity of hopelessness. Scores ranging from: 0 to 3 as are considered within the normal range, 4 to 8 identify mild hopelessness, scores from 9 to 14 identify moderate hopelessness, and scores greater than 14 identify severe hopelessness |
| Service Usage | change in total scores from baseline to 3-month post randomization assessment | Service usage (including formal (GPs/ other doctor and informal sector such as faith healers/imams) will be assessed using client service receipt inventory. There are no score ranges for this scale. |
| Episodes of Self-harm | change in total scores from baseline to 3-month post randomization assessment | Episodes of Self-harm will be assessed using the Suicide attempt self -injury interview. This is the semi-structured instrument to assess different aspects of episode of self-harm. This scale does not have any cut-off or score ranges. |
| Problem Solving Skills | change in total scores from baseline to 3-month post randomization assessment | Participants problem Solving skills will be assessed using Problem solving Inventory. Higher scores indicate better problem solving skills. The possible total scale score of PSI ranges between 32 and 192. |
| Client Satisfaction Questionaire | level of satisfaction at end of intervention i.e., 3-month post-randomization | Participant satisfaction with services will be assessed using the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire. Higher scores indicate greater level of satisfaction with the services. |
Countries
Pakistan
Contacts
Primary ContactTayyeba Kiran, PhD
Backup ContactSehrish Tofique, PhD fellow
Outcome results
None listed