Skip to content

Assessment of Mesiodistal Root Angulation Without Radiographic Guidance Versus CBCT Guidance: A Cross Sectional Study.

Assessment of Mesiodistal Root Angulation Without Radiographic Guidance Versus CBCT Guidance: A Cross Sectional Study.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06019351
Enrollment
141
Registered
2023-08-31
Start date
2022-10-21
Completion date
2023-09-21
Last updated
2023-08-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mesiodistal Root Angulation - Radiographic Guidance - CBCT Guidance - Assessment

Brief summary

Digital transformation in the orthodontic field profoundly alters the way in which orthodontic treatment is perceived and delivered, moreover it aids in creating individualized orthodontic appliances.A crucial step in digital orthodontic planning in either indirect bonding or aligner treatment is localization of mesiodistal tip. Earlier, Panoramic radiographs were formerly recommended to assist clinicians in properly identifying mesiodistal root angulation. recommended to help clinician to identify mesiodistal root angulation accurately. Owens et al. recorded clinically significant variation between the radiographic and the true root angulation. Alternatively CBCT (Cone Beam Computed Tomography) guided mesiodistal root angulation assessment has superior clinical significance compared to the routinely taken panoramic radiograph . despite its accuracy ,CBCT is not justified as a part of diagnostic records for orthodontic treatment planning following the ALARA rule . To eliminate additional x ray dose Computer aided mesiodistal root angulation identification is provided by several softwares such as OrthoAnalyzer™ ,OrthoCAD® ,and SureSmile® , however, the accuracy remains questionable. These finding may point out the importance of studying the accuracy mesiodistal identification to carry on digital workflow without the radiographic guidance.

Interventions

DEVICEOrthoAnalyzer™ software

OrthoAnalyzer™ software module from 3Shape Software

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with digital models and panoramic radiograph as a routine diagnostic orthodontic record before treatment. * Justified CBCT record taken for impacted and ectopic teeth, planning for MARPE (mini-screw assisted rapid palatal expansion)/MSE (maxillary skeletal expansion), critical tooth movements in periodontally compromised patients, surgery first cases, taken for previous studies and other reasons.

Exclusion criteria

* Severe crowding. * Teeth with bizarre anatomy or severely decayed. * Patients in mixed dentition stage.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Outcome mesiodistal Angulation: angle between dental axis created by the software according to model clinical crown and the dental long axis guided by the CBCT. (In degrees)through study completion, an average of 1 year.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026