Skip to content

Biostimulation After Tooth Extraction

Effect of Low-Level Laser Therapy in Wound Healing and Post-Operative Pain Management of Primary Molar Teeth Ex-traction: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06018584
Enrollment
40
Registered
2023-08-30
Start date
2016-11-01
Completion date
2018-05-01
Last updated
2023-08-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Caries in Children, Wound Heal

Brief summary

This study evaluated the effect of low-level laser therapy on postoperative pain and wound healing in children undergoing primary molar extractions 40children, 6-10 years of age, systemically healthy, and had atraumatic extraction indications of bilateral primary molar teeth were included in the study. A randomly selected tooth was extracted under local anesthesia in the first session. Only the clot formation on the socket was observed and photographed in the control group. Other group extractions were performed 2weeks later. The LLLT group was treated with a 980 nm wavelength Doctor Smile Wiser diode laser and photographed. Non-epithelialized surface measurements were performed with the ImageJ program. Pain assessment was performed with the Wong-Baker Pain Scale. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS software.

Interventions

OTHERTooth extraction

Tooth extractions were performed by a single physician. Topical anesthesia (Xylo-caine, Astra, Södertalje, Switzerland) was applied to the dried mucosa in the area to be lo-calized with the help of an ear stick for 1 minute. Posterior-superior-alveolar nerve block anesthesia and palatal anesthesia were applied for the upper primary molars; Inferi-or-alveolar nerve block anesthesia and lingual anesthesia (Ultracain, Aventis Pharma, Is-tanbul, Turkey) were applied for the lower primary molars. After anesthesia control was achieved, a randomly selected tooth was extracted. Tooth extraction on the other side was performed two weeks later. During the shootings, attention was paid to the traumatic ap-proach. After the control of bleeding was achieved, data were recorded for each group.

Sponsors

Hazal Özer
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 10 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* indication for tooth extraction in bilateral primary molars * did not have any systemic disease * the use of antibiotics and painkillers was stopped at least 12 hours ago

Exclusion criteria

* require complicated tooth extractions * systemic disease * the use of antibiotics and painkillers in 12 hours

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Wound healingintervention (tooth extraction) day, 3rd day and 7th dayFor the evaluation of soft tissue healing in extraction sockets, intraoral photographs were taken at an angle of 60° to the occlusal surface on the 3rd and 7th days following the extraction session. Non-epithelialized surface measurements were made by two observing physicians using the ImageJ (NIH, Rockville, USA) program.
Pain scoreintervention day (tooth extraction), 3rd day and 7th dayPain assessment in both groups was performed with the Wong-Baker Pain Rating Scale (Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale PRS). Patients were asked to choose a face or number from the scale, and the selected value was the practitioner dentist on the day of the procedure; other days were recorded by the parent. This scale is graded from 0 to 10. 0 indicates no pain, and 10 marks the most severe pain. It is asked to evaluate the pain according to the facial expression.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026