Skip to content

Adaptive Virtual Consultation Tool to Enhance Education and Understanding in Patients with Prostate Cancer

Development and Evaluation of an Adaptive Virtual Consultation Tool for Prostate Cancer Patients

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06016504
Enrollment
18
Registered
2023-08-29
Start date
2022-02-10
Completion date
2024-07-09
Last updated
2024-10-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate Carcinoma

Brief summary

This clinical trial aims to design and validate an adaptive virtual consultation tool (AVCT) for men with prostate cancer (PC). An AVCT utilizes health literacy assessments in combination with learning preferences and individual disease characteristics to provide focused and guided knowledge on PC tailored to the individual patient. Using an AVCT to enhance patient education may improve patient understanding and result in higher patient satisfaction with treatment decisions amongst men with PC.

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To develop an adaptive virtual consultation tool for PC (AVCT): Ia. To incorporate and integrate the inputs from a diverse group of patients (including minorities), patient advocates, nursing, physicians and education experts in the design process for the adaptive consultation tool; Ib. Employ user centered iterative design approach to develop an adaptive learning tool on mobile devices that is tailored to individuals based on symptoms, health literacy, learning style, and disease specific characteristics. II. To assess the feasibility, acceptability and usability of AVCT: IIa. To validate the design approach and customization rules at the completion of the participatory design process using a convenience sample of subjects through assessment of system interaction logs and qualitative feedback from users on cognition, ease-of-use, usability and customization efficacy; IIb. To utilize the feasibility study results in (2a) to refine the interface, information presentation, and adaptive customization approach. III. To determine the efficacy of AVCT using a small-scale comparative study: IIIa. To design and execute a three arm comparative study consisting of adaptive virtual consultation, non-adaptive virtual consultation and standard-practice information-only control intervention and assess the comparative efficacy of the tool on the main outcome variable, satisfaction with health care episode; IIIb. To measure changes in other outcome variables at baseline, post-intervention, 3-month and 12-month duration; IIIc. To analyze the mediating influence of decision self-efficacy and a number of moderating factors including preference for decision-making participation and health literacy on outcome variables. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 arms. ARM 1: Patients participate in an adaptive virtual consultation on trial. ARM 2: Patients participate in a non-adaptive virtual consultation on trial. ARM 3: Patients receive information-only on trial. After completion of study intervention, patients are followed up at 3- and 12-months post treatment decision.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALHealth Education

Participate in an adaptive virtual consultation

OTHERInformational Intervention

Given information-only

OTHERSurvey Administration

Ancillary studies

Sponsors

Mayo Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The participants in this study will be community dwelling, males with prostate cancer (PC) and their healthcare advocate, if applicable * Proficiency in English is required

Exclusion criteria

* Mental incompetency to participate in the study and/or no treatment option due to other health reasons

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient satisfaction measured by post utilization surveys3-month post treatment decisionPatient's satisfaction is to be measured by post utilization surveys using general Likert scale assessment tools. Descriptive statistics will be used to summarize the data at each study time point. For all the measures collected at multiple time points, generalized linear equations (GEE) will be used to evaluate the effect of treatment and time adjusting for usage pattern.
Health outcomes for cancer recurrence using PSABaselineMeasured by Prostate specific antigen ( PSA )
Health outcomes for urinary function using IPSSBaselineMeasured using International Prostate symptom score (IPSS)
Health outcomes for sexual function using SHIM scoreBaselineMeasured using Sexual Health inventory for men (SHIM) score
Health outcomes for urinary function3-month post treatment decisionMeasured using International Prostate symptom score (IPSS)
Health outcomes for sexual function3-month post treatment decisionMeasured using Sexual Health inventory for men (SHIM) score

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026