Skip to content

Safe, Effective and Cost-Effective Oxygen Saturation Targets for Children and Adolescents With Respiratory Distress: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Safe, Effective and Cost-Effective Oxygen Saturation Targets for Children and Adolescents With Respiratory Distress: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06016244
Acronym
OxyKids
Enrollment
566
Registered
2023-08-29
Start date
2023-09-04
Completion date
2025-04-04
Last updated
2026-07-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bronchial Hyperreactivity, Bronchiolitis, Lower Respiratory Tract Infection

Keywords

Oxygen saturation target, SpO2, Children

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to find out at which lower limit for saturation (amount of oxygen in the blood) we can best give extra oxygen to children that have been admitted for shortness of breath. We hope to accomplish a shorter period of illness for these children and that they can be discharged home earlier. Participants will receive supplemental oxygen if their blood oxygen levels are below 88% or below 92%. After admission, (parents of) participating children will fill out questionnaires. We will compare the two groups on their hospitalization duration and recovery. In other words, is it better to maintain a lower limit of 88% saturation or a lower limit of 92% in children admitted for shortness of breath?

Interventions

OTHEROxygen saturation threshold

Oxygen saturation threshold on which supplemental oxygen is decided

Sponsors

Spaarne Gasthuis
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Randomized controlled trial, parallel group, block randomized and stratified by age and centre.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Weeks to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 6 weeks to 12 years of age (corrected age for children with gestational age \< 37 weeks) * hospitalized with respiratory distress due to bronchiolitis, viral wheeze or lower respiratory tract infection, as diagnosed by the treating physician. Viral wheeze can only be diagnosed below the age of 6 years. * requiring supplemental oxygen as per usual care (SpO2 \<92% or for treating symptoms of respiratory distress as determined by the treating physician As respiratory distress in children with an asthma attack is mainly driven by hypoxia, they are at risk of undertreatment in the acute phase of the attack. Therefore, children aged 6-12 years of age with an asthma attack are excluded from this study.

Exclusion criteria

* children with, except for the studied diseases, pre-existing cardiopulmonary, neurological or hematological conditions (e.g. congenital thoracic malformation, airway malacia, post infectious bronchiolitis obliterans, childhood interstitial lung disease. primary immune deficiency) * children born \<32 weeks gestational age * children already included in other studies, which potentially interfere with this study * children (of parents) without a stable internet connection needed for answering questionnaires * children previously included in the current study * considering questionnaires are only available in Dutch and English, children (of parents) with different languages will be excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to meeting all discharge criteriaDischarge criteria are checked daily during admission up to discharge (generally a few days up to a week but longer if admission lasts longer) and the time and date at which all discharge criteria have been met will be recorded.Time in hours from admission to meeting all discharge criteria Discharge criteria include: * No need for supplemental oxygen for 4 hours, including a period of sleep for children aged \< 2 years * Clinically fit for discharge with normal or minimally increased respiratory rate AND no or mild respiratory distress, as judged by nurses and physicians using the Parshuram et al scoring system, commonly used in Dutch paediatric practice as part of the Pediatric Early Warning Scale\]. * No need for in-hospital feeding or medication by nasogastric tube (NGT). * No need for in-hospital intravenous treatment. * No need for in-hospital nebulized bronchodilator treatment. * No need for in-hospital treatment with metered dose inhalator inhalations more often than every 3 hours. * No need for high flow delivered by high flow nasal cannula or nasal prongs.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Length of stayDuring admissionTime from admission to discharge in hours
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) admissionsDuring admissionNumber of PICU admissions per group
Time on oxygen therapyDuring admissionTime in hours spent on supplemental oxygen
Duration of symptomsfrom admission to 90 days after dischargeMeasured as days from admission to having met all of the following criteria: resolution of cough, resolution of dyspnea as indicated by parent, cessation of scheduled bronchodilator use.
Return to normal healthfrom admission to 90 days after dischargeMeasured as days from admission to parent reported normal health. Upon discharge parents/patients are asked to record the last day of illness and report this in the follow-up questionnaires
Time to return to school/daycarefrom admission to 90 days after dischargeMeasured as days from admission to parent reported return to school/daycare
Unscheduled health care visits or admissions after dischargefrom admission to 28 days after dischargeNumber of unscheduled visits or admissions up to 28 days after discharge
Patient quality of lifeat discharge, 7, 28 and 90 days follow-upMeasured by digital questionnaire of EQ-5D-Y (modified versions are used in agreement with EuroQol for patients \< 4 years)
Overall pediatric healthat discharge, 7, 28 and 90 days follow-upICHOM PROMIS Pediatric Global Health set
Parental anxietyat discharge, 7 and 28 days follow-upby anxiety items of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Economic evaluationUp to 90 days after dischargeThe aim of the economic evaluation is to relate the incremental costs of an SpO2 of 88% (intervention) in comparison with an SpO2 of 92% (control) to the incremental health effects. Both a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) and a cost-utility analysis (CUA) will be performed from a societal and healthcare perspective

Countries

Netherlands

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAnnmeie LM Boehmer, MD, PhD

Spaarne Gasthuis

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 15, 2026