Skip to content

TAMO Therapy Versus Postural Control Exercise in Children With Congenital Muscular Torticollis

Effect Of Postural Control Exercise Versus¬¬ Tscharnuter Akademie For Motor Organization (TAMO) Therapy On Range Of Motion And Motor Function In Children With Congenital Muscular Torticollis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06015555
Enrollment
18
Registered
2023-08-29
Start date
2023-02-23
Completion date
2023-07-01
Last updated
2023-08-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Torticollis Congenital

Brief summary

A randomized control trial was conducted through convenient sampling. 18 subjects were randomly allocated into two groups, group A received postural control exercises in addition to conventional therapy, while Group B received TAMO therapy along with conventional therapy. analysis.

Detailed description

Torticollis is common in children and can be congenital or acquired. Acquired cases can result from neck muscles or bone injuries. Though distressing for parents, it usually improves over time. Treatment includes postural control exercise and TAMO therapy, along with conventional treatment. To compare the effects of TAMO therapy versus postural control exercises on children with congenital muscular torticollis on cervical range of motion. A randomized control trial was conducted through convenient sampling. Eighteen subjects were randomly allocated into two groups; Group A received postural control exercises in addition to conventional therapy, while group B received TAMO therapy along with conventional therapy. The duration of the treatment was eight weeks. Goniometer, still photography, muscle function. Eighteen participants (n=18) were included in the study.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALTAMO

TAMO therapy

Postural Control exercises

Sponsors

khadija liaquat
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
3 Months to 6 Months
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Greater than 3 months * Both genders * Abnormal neck posture * Torticollis of both sides

Exclusion criteria

* SCM mass present * Deficit in cervical PROM greater than 15 degree * Craniosynostosis (it is a birth defect in which the bones in a baby skull join together too early) * Infectious * Metabolic * Scoliosis of spine * Developmental plagiocephaly * SCM tumor * Visual disorder

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
GoniometerReadings were taken at baseline and four months of interventionIt measured cervical range of motion.
Muscle function Scale:Readings were taken at baseline and four months of interventionMFS is a tool used to check the function of the lateral flexors, a scale of 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating better function of muscles.Readings were taken at baseline and after four months of intervention of the neck in children,

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026