Skip to content

Clear Aligner Versus Removable Inclined Plane in Treatment of Anterior Crossbite

Clear Aligner Versus Removable Inclined Plane in Treatment of Anterior Crossbite

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06015386
Enrollment
24
Registered
2023-08-29
Start date
2023-06-22
Completion date
2024-07-30
Last updated
2023-08-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anterior Crossbite

Keywords

clear aligner , anterior crossbite , inclined plane

Brief summary

the study is carried in faculty of dentistry Mansoura university to compare the efficiency and health quality life improvement between clear aligner and inclined plane in treatment of anterior crossbite

Detailed description

the study \*include 24 patient each group include 12 patient where randomly allocated and intra-oral scanning is done for them followed by software designing ,printing using PETG sheets of 0.75 in aligner group while in inclined plane the appliance is formed in conventional way.

Interventions

OTHERinclined plane

2 parallel groups one treated with clear aligner and other treated using inclined plane

2 parallel groups one treated with clear aligner and other treated using inclined plane

Sponsors

Mansoura University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
7 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients age (7-12) years. 2. anterior crossbite 3. More than one tooth in a crossbite. 4. Favorable oral hygiene 5. No oral habits 6. ANB within the normal range i.e. (The crossbite will be diagnosed as functional or dental) \-

Exclusion criteria

1. Systemic conditions that may interfere with the treatment. 2. Bad habits that might jeopardize the appliance. 3. Transverse discrepancy. 4. Previous orthodontic treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
(OHRQoL (Oral Health-related Quality of Life)4 monthCPQ8-10 scores at two different points in time.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
cephalometric analysis of data4 monthcompare cephalometric variables between two groups
3D model measurements4 monthcompare 3D model measurements variable between 2 group

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary Contactasmaa Mohammed, BDS
asmaasalah@mans.edu.eg1142820091

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026