Skip to content

Prevention of Vasovagal Reactions in First-time Blood Donors Using a Combined PSYchological and Physiological Approach

Prospective Study of the Prevention of Vasovagal Reactions in First-time Whole Blood Donors Using a Combined PSYchological and Physiological Approach: PREDONPSY

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06014346
Acronym
PREDONPSY
Enrollment
5320
Registered
2023-08-28
Start date
2023-10-10
Completion date
2026-08-18
Last updated
2023-10-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Vasovagal Reaction

Keywords

first time donor, whole blood donation, vasovagal Reaction, physiological, psychological, BDRI, BDAS

Brief summary

The prevention of vasovagal reactions (VVR) occurring during or after donation is a major issue for the French Blood Establishment (EFS), firstly to guarantee the safety of donors but also to retain them, as this reaction is one of the negative experiences affecting the return to donation. The EVASION study conducted in the Auvergne Rhône-Alpes region (AURA) on 4828 donors representative of the French donor population, reported a beneficial effect of muscle contraction exercises to prevent the occurrence of VVR during donation, while hydric solutions, and even more so isotonic solutions, were likely to decrease the frequency of delayed VVR. These preventive measures have been integrated into the internal guidelines and currently include muscular and breathing exercises and hydration. Nevertheless, the isotonic solution could not be routinely deployed for feasibility and cost reasons. A salty snack could replace the isotonic solution to produce the same effects with better feasibility and acceptability. Furthermore, a significant proportion of discomfort is psychological in origin, related to stress and anxiety which persist despite these measures, particularly in the first-time donor population. These measures, which are mainly focused on the prevention of VVR of physiological origin, are still insufficient and can be optimized and complemented to reduce the occurrence of VVR, especially in first-time donors for whom anxiety and stress play an important role in the etiology of VVR. Two measures could further reduce the occurrence of VVR: * Reinforcement of the physiological strategy: ingestion of a salty snack before donation, the effect of which could be similar to the effect of the isotonic solution, which could not be delivered in practice because of its cost following the data of the EVASION study. * Addition of a psychological strategy: flyer given at the interview presenting the four most frequent fears as well as a description of the recommended muscular and respiratory exercises, followed by the execution of the recommended exercises before the sampling. Hypothesis is that the combination of a psychological and physiological strategies would allow a reduction of the occurrence of immediate and/or 48 h delayed VVR during the whole blood donation in first time donors compared to the current practices.

Interventions

OTHERPsychological strategy

* flyer given at the interview presenting the 4 most frequent fears as well as a description of the recommended muscular and breathing exercises, * then realization accompanied by a training of these exercises

OTHERPhysiological strategy

\- ingesting a salty snack

Sponsors

Hospices Civils de Lyon
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* M/F between 18 and 70 years old, * A first-time donor who wishes to donate blood in Lyon, either at a fixed site or at a mobile unit, * Declared fit to donate whole blood after the EFS pre-donation interview, * Weight ≥ 50kg and height ≥ 135 cm, * Available for telephone contact between to 5d +/- 2 days after donation, * Having signed a written consent to participate in the study. Non-inclusion criteria: * Known allergy to shellfish, and/or gluten, and/or milk, and/or soy, * Incomprehension of the French language, * First-time donor under protective measures (guardian, curator) or any other administrative measure, * Not affiliated to the French social security system or any other equivalent system, * Pregnant or breastfeeding woman, * Subject participating in any other interventional or non-interventional research

Exclusion criteria

* Withdrawal of consent * First-time donor with anemia following routine hemoglobin testing * First-time donor not reachable for telephone interview

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Vasovagal reactions (VVR)Day 1 = donation day ; Day 3 = 48h post donationProportion of first-time donors experiencing VVR (immediate and delayed up to 48 hours) during whole blood donation managed by both psychological and physiological strategies (group 4) compared to usual standard practices (group 1)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
VVR physiological strategyDay 1 = donation day ; Day 3= 48h post donationProportion of first-time donors experiencing VVR (immediate and delayed up to 48 hours) during whole blood donation managed by physiological strategy (group 3) compared to usual standard practices (group 1)
Immediate VVRDay 1 = donation day, before leaving the centreProportion of first-time donors with immediate VVR compared between the groups
Delayed VVRDay 3= 48h post donationProportion of first-time donors with delayed VVR compared between the groups
First-time donor adherenceDay 1 = donation day, before leaving the centreAdherence of the primary donor to the study strategies and to the EFS recommendations (complete intake of salty snacks, hydration, performance of muscle and breathing exercises training, performance of muscle and breathing exercises during donation, compliance with the duration of post-donation monitoring stage).
VVR psychological strategyDay 1 = donation day ; Day 3= 48h post donationProportion of first-time donors experiencing VVR (immediate and delayed up to 48 hours) during whole blood donation managed by psychological strategy (group 2) compared to usual standard practices (group 1)
Sense of control and fearsDay 1 = donation day, before donationAssessment of the sense of control and fears score, compared between the groups. The concepts measured here are the feeling of control related to giving blood (5 items) and the feeling of control over fears (4 items) according to a 5-point Likert scale. The scoring is obtained by summing up the answers to the different items. Score is between 9 and 45, a higher score is associated to a better outcome.
Feelings of discomfortDay 1 = donation day, after donation and before leaving the centreAssessment of the feelings of discomfort score, compared between the groups. The BDRI (Blood Donation Reactions Inventory) (France et al., 2008) provides an assessment of the subjective evaluation of 11 pre-syncopal symptoms (5-point Likert scale). The BDRI is easily understood by donors and is rapid. The BDRI provides important information about the donor experience to predict satisfaction and likelihood of re-donation. The score is calculated by summing up the responses to the various items. Score is between 11 and 55, a higher score is associated to a worse outcome.
First-time donor retentionMonth 12 following the first-time donationCompared between the groups the number of first-time donors who made a second blood donation in the 12 months following the first-time donation, collected by query from the EFS computerized file
Anxiety/fearDay 1 = donation day, before donationAssessment of the evolution of the anxiety/fear score between arrival and before the whole blood donation, compared between the groups. This questionnaire consists of the 6-item Blood Donor Anxiety Scale (BDAS) (5-point Likert scale) (Chell et al., 2016) and a 4-item component with a 5-point Likert scale that allows for an assessment of the 4 most common donor fears (of the needle, to see blood, to feel pain, to experience sensations of discomfort). The scoring is obtained by summing up the responses to the different items. Score is between 10 and 50, a higher score is associated to a better outcome.

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactBrice MD POREAU
brice.poreau@efs.sante.fr478 656 137
Backup ContactJulie MD-PhD HAESEBAERT
julie.haesebaert@chu-lyon.fr472 115 732

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026