Skip to content

Alvocade® (Bortezomib) Safety and Effectiveness Study

A Phase IV, Post Marketing, Prospective, Observational Cohort Study to Investigate Safety and Effectiveness of Alvocade® in Iranian Patients With Multiple Myeloma

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06012383
Enrollment
57
Registered
2023-08-25
Start date
2016-07-31
Completion date
2022-12-31
Last updated
2023-08-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Myeloma, Refractory

Keywords

Multiple Myeloma, Bortezomib, Safety, Alvocade

Brief summary

This study is a phase IV, post-marketing, observational, cohort study for safety and effectiveness evaluation of Alvocade® use in Iranian patients with multiple myeloma. No control groups were considered in the study design. The primary objective of this study was safety assessment, including the incidence of adverse events (AEs).

Detailed description

This study is a phase IV, post-marketing, observational, cohort study for safety and effectiveness evaluation of Alvocade® use in Iranian patients with multiple myeloma. Data were gathered in two booklets, containing information on sixteen injections, which were filled by the designated physician. Exposure to Alvocade® in this study was defined as administration of bortezomib (Alvocade®, NanoAlvand) with a dose of 1.3 mg/m2, once every 3 weeks during 2.5 to 5.5 months (16 injections). The primary objective of this study was safety assessment, including the incidence of adverse events (AEs). This study was single arm and the sample size of this study was 59 patients.

Interventions

DRUGBortezomib

Alvocade® was given with a dose of 1.3 mg/m2.

Sponsors

NanoAlvand
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with multiple myeloma were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria

* There were no

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety Assessmentup to 6 monthsSafety assessment, including the incidence of AEs. All AEs were classified based on the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA Desktop Browser 4.0 Beta) terms as System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred Term (PT). All the reported events were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 (CTCAE v5.0). Moreover, seriousness of AEs was assessed according to International Council for Harmonisation (ICH-E2B) guidelines. The causality relation was assessed based on the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Effectiveness Assessmentup to 6 monthsResponse categories (Stable Disease (SD), Partial Response (PR), Very Good Partial Response (VGPR), Complete Response (CR), and stringent Complete Response (sCR)) were defined and reported based on the uniform response criteria of the International Myeloma Working Group.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026