Skip to content

Glaucoma Screening With Artificial Intelligence

Glaucoma Screening With Artificial Intelligence - A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Optical Texture Analysis and Optic Disc Photography Assessment

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06012058
Enrollment
3175
Registered
2023-08-25
Start date
2023-08-26
Completion date
2025-02-25
Last updated
2023-09-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Glaucoma

Keywords

Ophthalmology, Glaucoma, Artificial Intelligence, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Optical Texture Analysis, Optic Disc Photography Assessment

Brief summary

This randomized clinical trial aims to compare the diagnostic performance of two AI-enabled screening strategies - ROTA (RNFL optical texture analysis) assessment versus optic disc photography - in detecting glaucoma within a population-based sample. Secondary objectives are to (1) compare the diagnostic performance of ROTA AI assessment versus OCT RNFL thickness assessment by AI, and ROTA AI assessment versus OCT RNFL thickness assessment by trained graders, (2) investigate the cost-effectiveness of AI ROTA assessment for glaucoma screening, and (3) estimate the prevalence of glaucoma in Hong Kong.

Detailed description

Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness affecting 76 million patients worldwide in 2020. Characterized by progressive degeneration of the optic nerve, early detection of disease deterioration with timely intervention is critical to prevent progressive loss in vision. In the 5th World Glaucoma Association Consensus Meeting, a diverse and representative group of glaucoma clinicians and scientists deliberated on the value and methods of glaucoma screening. Whereas it has been recognized that early detection of glaucoma for treatment is beneficial to preserve the quality of vision and quality of life as glaucoma treatments are often effective, easy to use and well tolerated, the optimal screening strategy for glaucoma has not yet been determined. ROTA (Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Optical Texture Analysis) is a patented algorithm designed to detect axonal fiber bundle loss in glaucoma. Unlike conventional Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) analysis, ROTA uses non-linear transformation to reveal the optical textures and trajectories of axonal fiber bundles, allowing for intuitive and reliable recognition of RNFL abnormalities without the need for normative databases. It can be applied across different OCT models and is particularly effective at detecting focal RNFL defects in early glaucoma and varying degrees of RNFL damage in end-stage glaucoma. The proposed study will address whether the application AI on ROTA is feasible and cost-effective in the setting of glaucoma screening, and whether ROTA would outperform optic disc photography and OCT RNFL thickness assessment.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTROTA assessment by AI

The RNFL is imaged with OCT for ROTA and the data are analyzed with a deep learning model.

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTOptic disc assessment by AI

The optic disc is imaged with color fundus camera and the data are analyzed with a deep learning model.

Sponsors

Orbis
CollaboratorOTHER
The University of Hong Kong
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

This is a randomized clinical trial with the primary objective to compare the diagnostic performance of two screening strategies - Retinal nerve fiber layer Optical Texture Analysis (ROTA) assessment by Artificial Intelligence (AI) versus (vs.) optic disc photography assessment by AI or trained graders - for detection of glaucoma in a population-based sample.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Individuals aged 50 years or above

Exclusion criteria

* Physically incapacitated * Not able to cooperate for clinical examination or optical coherence tomography (OCT) investigation will be excluded

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diagnostic performance for detection of glaucomaup to ~1 yearThe area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for detection of glaucoma

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for population screening of glaucomaup to ~1 yearICER for glaucoma screening measured by incremental cost per true positive case detected, incremental cost per incremental QALY
The prevalence of glaucomaup to ~1 yearProportion of patients with glaucoma

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diagnostic performance for detection of macular diseasesup to ~1 yearThe area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for detection of macular diseases
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for population screening of glaucoma and macular diseasesup to ~1 yearICER for glaucoma and macular diseases screening measured by incremental cost per true positive case detected, incremental cost per incremental QALY
The prevalence of macular diseasesup to ~1 yearProportion of patients with macular diseases

Countries

Hong Kong

Contacts

Primary ContactAnita Yau
anitayky@hku.hk39102673

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026