Skip to content

Intravenous Continuous LMWH Seems to Be Safe Alternative to UFH in VV ECMO Patients

Intravenous Continuous LMWH (enoxaparin) Seems to Be Safe Alternative to UFH in Patients with VV ECMO

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06010446
Enrollment
43
Registered
2023-08-24
Start date
2019-05-15
Completion date
2023-08-15
Last updated
2025-02-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Refractory Respiratory Failure

Brief summary

Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is worldwide anticoagulation used and recommended anticoagulation in patients with ECMO support. However, it is accompanied with incidence of bleeding or thrombotic compliaction at about 40-60% and high mortality. Because ECMO produce primary haemosthasis pathology, there is a theory that prophylaxis of thrombosis with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) e.g. Enoxaparin might be sufficient to prevent ECMO throbosis and thrombosis development in patients. We decided to performed retrospective observation study and analysis of data, from may 2019 until august 2023, in all patients who were put on VV ECMO and to analysis incidence of bleeding, thrombotic and neurologic complications.

Detailed description

Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is worldwide anticoagulation used and recommended anticoagulation in patients with ECMO support. However, it is accompanied with incidence of bleeding or thrombotic compliaction at about 40-60% and high mortality. Because ECMO produce primary haemosthasis pathology, there is a theory that prophylaxis of thrombosis with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) e.g. Enoxaparin might be sufficient to prevent ECMO throbosis and thrombosis development in patients. This phenomenon of primary haemosthasis pathology may protect ECMO from thrombotic complication as primary haemosthasis plays major role in haemosthasis taking places in high shear stress condiditon such as ECMO. Because LMWH is connected with lower incidence of bleeding complication and HIT (heparin induced thrombocytopenia) in general, in case that patients on VV ECMO developed primary haemosthasis pathology detected by PFA 200, we started to use LMWH instead of UFH in VV ECMO patients. We decided to performed retrospective observation study and analysis of data, from may 2019 until august 2023, in all patients who were put on VV ECMO and to analysis incidence of bleeding, thrombotic and neurologic complications. We want to compare this incidence of compliactions with data known from patients with other studies using UFH.

Interventions

OTHERNo intervention, just retrospective analysis of data.

Sponsors

University Hospital, Motol
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* VV ECMO - use of 2 separate cannulas (jugular and femoral) * anticoagulation with only intravenous continuous LMWH (Enoxaparin) * only a period of the first ECMO set running

Exclusion criteria

* pregnancy * Avalon cannula (one double lumen cannula) * patients after thoraco-abdominal surgery * patients after lung transplantation in early postoperative period * patients after trauma without any type of heparin ,,heparin free ECMO

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of major bleeding complicationsDaty from may 2019 till august 2023Defined by ECMO registry
Incidence of major thrombotic complicationsDaty from may 2019 till august 2023Defined by ECMO registry
Incidence of major neurologic complicationsDaty from may 2019 till august 2023Defined by ECMO registry

Countries

Czechia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026