Skip to content

Effects of Neuro-dynamic Mobilization Techniques on Upper Limb Functions in Pronator Teres Syndrome

Effects of Neuro-dynamic Mobilization Techniques on Upper Limb Functions in Pronator Teres Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06009692
Enrollment
60
Registered
2023-08-24
Start date
2023-08-20
Completion date
2024-02-20
Last updated
2024-08-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pronator Teres Syndrome

Keywords

Upper limb functions, Neurodynamics, Pronator Teres Syndrome, Task Oriented training

Brief summary

The study aimed to determine the effects of neuro-dynamic techniques on upper limb motor and sensory functions and to compare the effects of slider versus tensioner neuro-dynamic techniques on upper limb motor and sensory functions in pronator teres syndrome.

Detailed description

The study aimed to determine the effects of neuro-dynamic techniques on upper limb motor and sensory functions and to compare the effects of slider versus tensioner neuro-dynamic techniques on upper limb motor and sensory functions in pronator teres syndrome. Pronator teres syndrome is a rare condition and easily overlooked and mistaken for the more prevalent carpal tunnel syndrome. The median nerve may also be squeezed between the heads of the pronator teres muscle in addition to the carpal tunnel. Patients report pain, numbness, or paresthesia over the lateral 3.5-digit area and anterior forearm, which worsens with forced pronation. This condition is most common in the dominant hand or sometimes can be associated with advanced forearm muscle.in our routine clinical practice, The neuro-dynamic techniques is not that common in neurological physical therapy practice so the effects of neuro -dynamics with conventional therapy needs to be evaluated for better outcomes in upper limb functions.

Interventions

OTHERUpper limb Neuro-dynamics (Slider/ Tensioner Technique)

The experimental group will receive neuro-dynamic mobilization techniques along with task oriented training. Slider versus tensioner technique will be applied according to each patient's need. Session time will be 25-30 minutes. Four series of 10 tensioning movements at a rhythm of ∼6s per cycle and 1 min rest between each series will be performed. After each cycle of 10 repetitions, the position will hold for 10s.

OTHERConventional Therapy for Upper limb

Conventional treatment will include therapeutic ultrasound for 4 min, TENS for 10 min. Task oriented training will be designed according to patient's functional outcomes. Sessions will be given for 6 days a week, 25-30 minutes per day.

Sponsors

Riphah International University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosed with pronator teres syndrome * At least 6 working hours/ day * Positive Tinel's sign at pronator area (Hoffman's sign) * Positive Pronator teres syndrome test

Exclusion criteria

* Any previous history of metabolic disease, liver disease/ diabetes * History of previous injuries to the cervical spine including radiculopathies and myelopathies as well as spinal stenosis and/or spinal disc herniation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Numeric visual analogue scale (VAS)2 weeksNumeric visual analogue scale (VAS) is a self-reported assessment that consists of a line with severe anchors ranging from no pain to intense pain, which can be vertical or horizontal. Most frequently 10 cm long, this line serves as a continuum of pain severity. High test-retest reliability for the VAS has been recorded (ICC = 0.71-0.99). VAS is regarded as a powerful, therapeutically practical, accurate, and true measure of pain severity.
Upper Extremity Functional Scale (UEFS)2 weeksUpper Extremity Functional Scale (UEFS) is an 8-item, region-specific questionnaire designed to evaluate diseases of the upper extremities caused by work. The UEFS is a valid, reliable, and responsive tool created to assess how patients with a range of diseases are affected by upper extremity disorders in terms of function. UEFS demonstrate good internal consistency (Cronbach alpha \> 0.83).
Jamar hand held dynamometer2 weeksJamar hand held dynamometer is widely used in clinical practice and research as a result of the American Society of Hand Therapists (ASHT) recommendation of it as the gold standard. The ICC for the Jamar dynamometer ranged from .996 to .998 (p\< 0.05).
Range of Motion2 weeksGoniometer is a method for measuring joint range of motion (ROM) that is widely accepted. It uses accurate and reliable measurement tools, especially the universal goniometer. For goniometry, Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC- 3, k) of 0.94 showed excellent intra-ratter reliability.
Nottingham sensory assessment Scale2 weeksThe Nottingham sensory assessment is a standardized scale for assessing sensory assessment in stroke patients. The NSA consists of 20 items and four subscales. The subscales included proprioception, stereognosis, two-point discrimination and tactile feeling. Each subscales item on tactile location on both sides of the body and bilateral simultaneous contact can be graded on the scale of 0-2. The Cronbach's alpha was used to evaluate internal consistency, values over 0.70 indicate Strong internal consistency.
Wolf Motor Function Test2 weeksWolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) quantifies upper extremity movement ability through timed single- or multiple-joint motions and functional tasks. The original version consisted of 21 item; the widely used version of the WMFT consists of 17 items Composed of 3 parts: Time, Functional ability &Strength. It Includes 15 function-based tasks and 2 strength based tasks Performance time is referred to as WMFT-TIME. Functional ability is referred to as WMFT-FAS. Items 1-6 involve timed functional tasks, items 7-14 are measures of strength, and the remaining 9 items consist of analyzing movement quality when completing various tasks. The WMFT is an instrument with high inter rater reliability, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and adequate stability.

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026