Skip to content

Efficacy & Safety of Pigtail Catheter Drainage Versus Need Based Thoracocentesis for Recurrent Hepatic Hydrothorax.

Efficacy & Safety of Pigtail Catheter Drainage Versus Need Based Thoracocentesis for Recurrent Hepatic Hydrothorax. A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06007820
Enrollment
70
Registered
2023-08-23
Start date
2023-08-15
Completion date
2024-02-27
Last updated
2023-08-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hepatic Hydrothorax

Brief summary

In cirrhotic patients with recurrent hepatic hydrothorax liver transplantation is a definitive treatment. But a significant number of individual are ineligible for liver transplantation. In these patients to ameliorate the symptoms various treatment modalities such as TIPS, serial thoracocentesis, pigtail catheter drainage and pleurodesis are used. We are doing this study to assess the safety and efficacy of serial thoracocentesis verus pigtail catheter drainage.

Detailed description

* Study population - Cirrhotic patients with recurrent hepatic hydrothorax * Study design - A prospective, randomized, single center open label study * Block Randomization, block size - 10 * Sample size - Assuming in single time thoracocentesis group 5+/-3.67 thoracocentesis is required, investigator expect a 50 % reduction in pigtail drainage group. Apha error- 5, power -90, 15% dropout 35 patients in each arm * Intervention - Group 1 - on-demand therapeutic thoracocentensis, Group 2 - small volume frequent thoracocentesis using PCD. * Monitoring and assessment * At enrollment: (A) Complete history and examination 1. Etiology of cirrhosis 2. Severity of ascites, Jaundice 3. Prior Hepatic encephalopathy, bleed, Jaundice 4. Prior Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, large volume paracentesis frequency 5. Pattern and number of prior decompensation 6. Prior Acute on Chronic Liver Failure and Acute Kidney episodes 7. Use of non selective beta blockers, norfloxaxin, rifaximin and albumin 8. History of Endoscopic Variceal ligation or other endotherapy 9. History of Hypertension, Diabetes 10. Fever , signs of sepsis (SIRS) 11. Examination- Sarcopenia, fraility, icterus, pedal edema At follow-up (at daily till Day - 7, thereafter at Day - 30 and Day 90) Complete history and examination 1. Complications - SBP, SBE, ACLF and Jaundice, HE/ AKI episodes 2. HTN, Diabetes control 3. Fever , signs of sepsis (SIRS) 4. Examination- Sarcopenia, fraility, icterus, pedal edema, ascites, HE Clinical Evaluation 1\. Etiology of chronic liver disease (Baseline) 2. Severity of liver disease (Baseline, Day - 7, Day - 30, Day - 90 ) 3. MELD score, MELD-Na score, CTP score (Baseline, Day - 7, Day - 30, Day - 90 ) 4. Complications (Baseline, Day - 7, Day - 30, Day - 90 ) 5. Overt HE, PHT related Bleed, clinical jaundice, ascites, hyponatremia, AKI, SBP, Infection (specify site and severity), Frequency of Large Volume Paracentesis, On Demand Thoracocentesis * Labs and follow up Baseline (at admission) - 1. Blood : KFT, LFT, CBC, INR, AFP, PCT, S.PRA, Pro-BNP, Urinary Na 2. Imaging : USG abdomen, X-ray chest, 2D ECHO 3. Pleural fluid/ ascitic fluid - TLC, DLC, Protein, Sugar, SPAG, SAAG, ADA, c/s 4. Hemodynamics : Intrapleural pressures at first TT 5. Baseline (at randomization, Day -3 and Day - 7 in PCD-TT) - 6. Blood : KFT, INR; S.PRA, Pro-BNP, Urinary Na (at Day 7) 7. Imaging : X-ray chest 8. Pleural fluid/ ascitic fluid - TLC, DLC, SPAG, c/s if indicated 9. Day - 60, Day - 90 (end of follow-up) 10. Blood : KFT, LFT, CBC, INR, AFP 11. Imaging : USG abdomen, X-ray chest, 2D ECHO * STATISTICAL ANALYSIS - 1. Data will be reported as mean + SD. 2. Categorical variables will be compared using the chi-square test or Fisher exact test 3. Normal continuous variables will be compared using the Student's t test 4. Non normal continuous variables will be compared using the Mann-Whitney rank-sum test (unpaired data) or the Wilcoxon test (paired data). 5. The actuarial probability of survival will be calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. 6. A Cox regression analysis will be performed to identify independent prognostic factors for survival. 7. Univariate and multivariate analysis will be used whenever applicable. * Adverse effects - Chest pain, pain at the site, Breathlessness, infection, pneumothorax, infection, bleeding * Stopping rule - 1. Liver Transplant 2. Appearance of SBP, PICD, HE. 3. Mortality 4. End of follow-up

Interventions

PROCEDURELarge Volume Thoracocentesis

Large Volume Thoracocentesis

Pigtail Catheter

Sponsors

Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age 18-75 years 2. CLD with refilling symptomatic hepatic hydrothorax

Exclusion criteria

1. CTP \>12, MELD\>25 2. Tubercular PE, Ischemic cardiac disease 3. If opting for TIPS/ LT 4. Severe HPS 5. Prior or current SBE/ SBP, septic shock 6. Patients on mechanical ventilator 7. Serum Creatinine \>2 mg/dl 8. Extrahepatic malignancy 9. Serum Sodium \< 120 10. Post TIPS/ BRTO/ SAE patients 11. Post renal or liver transplantation 12. Lack of informed consent 13. Hepatocellular carcinoma outside milan criteria 14. Non-cirrhotic portal HT 15. Known HIV infection 16. Pregnant women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Frequency of Repeated ThoracocentesisDay 30

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Frequency of Repeated Thoracocentesis.Day 30 and Day 90
Rate of Complete Response, Partial Response, No response.Day 7, Day 30, Day 90
Number of times Thoracocentesis is required between both groups at Day 30Day 30
Number of times Thoracocentesis is required between both groups at Day 90Day 90
Proportion of pateint developing Post thoracocentesis Shock (Change in Heart Rate, Blood pressure) at Day 7Day 7
Proportion of pateint developing Post thoracocentesis Shock (Change in Heart Rate, Blood pressure) at Day 30Day 30
Proportion of pateint developing Post thoracocentesis Shock (Change in Heart Rate, Blood pressure) at Day 90Day 90
Change in Renal parameters - Serum Creatinine at Day 7Day 7
Change in Renal parameters - Serum Creatinine at Day 30Day 30
Change in Renal parameters - Serum Creatinine at Day 90Day 90
Hepatic encephalopathy: Grading as per West Haven Classification.Day 7West Haven Grade (1-4) will be used to assess Hepatic Encephaloapthy, Grade 4 means worse outcome.
Proportion of participants developing Na < 120 meg/l Day 7Day 7
Proportion of participants developing Na < 120 meg/l Day 30Day 30
Proportion of participants developing Na < 120 meg/l Day 90Day 90
Dose of Diuretic in each arm Day 7Day 7
Dose of Diuretic in each arm Day 30Day 30
Dose of Diuretic in each arm Day 90Day 90
Proportion of patient developing Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis at Day 7Day 7
Incidence of refilling hydrothorax within72 hours
Proportion of patient developing Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis at Day 90Day 90
Proportion of patients developing Spontaneous Bacterial Empyema Day 7Day 7
Proportion of patients developing Spontaneous Bacterial Empyema Day 30Day 30
Proportion of patients developing Spontaneous Bacterial Empyema Day 90Day 90
No. of days pateint surviving without Liver transplant and TIPS at Day 7Day 7
No. of days pateint surviving without Liver transplant and TIPS at Day 30Day 30
No. of days pateint surviving without Liver transplant and TIPS at Day 90Day 90
Incidence of Post procedure complications in between both groups at Day 7Day 7
Incidence of Post procedure complications in between both groups at Day 30Day 30
Incidence of Post procedure complications in between both groups at Day 90Day 90
Changes in MELD between the groupsDay 7
Changes in CTP between the groupsDay 7
Number of Episodes of Hospitalization between both groups at Day 7Day 7
Number of Episodes of Hospitalization between both groups at Day 30Day 30
Number of Episodes of Hospitalization between both groups at Day 90Day 90
Cumulative dose of albumin at D7 in two groupsDay 7
Cumulative dose of albumin at D30 in two groupsDay 30
Cumulative dose of albumin at D90 in two groupsDay 90
Proportion of patient developing Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis at Day 30Day 30

Countries

India

Contacts

Primary ContactDr Jaifrin Daniel, MD
jdaniel.m07@gmail.com01146300000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026