Skip to content

Prevention and Treatment of CINV Caused by TC Regimen in Gynecological Malignant Tumor Patients

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Study on Prevention and Treatment of CINV Induced by TC Regimen in Gynecological Malignant Tumors

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06007586
Enrollment
143
Registered
2023-08-23
Start date
2024-05-31
Completion date
2025-07-04
Last updated
2025-12-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cervical Cancer, Endometrial Cancer, Fallopian Tube Cancer, Gynecological Tumor, Ovarian Cancer

Keywords

Gynecologic Cancer, chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, Paclitaxel-carboplatin

Brief summary

To determine the best method to prevent CINV caused by TC regimen in patients with gynecological malignant tumor. Paclitaxel-carboplatin (TC) is the most widely used regimen for gynecologic malignancies, yet chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) remain common and distressing. Optimal prophylaxis is uncertain. This trial evaluated whether adding the NK1 receptor antagonist aprepitant to standard two-drug prophylaxis (5-HT3 receptor antagonist plus dexamethasone) improves CINV control.

Detailed description

The risk of vomiting caused by high-dose carboplatin is controversial, and there is currently no prevention of TC in patients with gynecological malignant tumors High-level evidence-based medical evidence for programme-induced CINV. Therefore, different guidelines recommend the best antiemetic regimen as well It's different. This study is intended to conduct a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study The designed Phase III clinical study provides important data and basis for clinical practice and guideline formulation. In this prospective, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover phase III trial, patients with gynecologic malignancies scheduled for at least two cycles of TC were randomly assigned to receive aprepitant or placebo with ondansetron and dexamethasone during cycle 1, crossing over to the alternate regimen in cycle 2. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR: no emesis, no significant nausea and no rescue therapy) in the delayed phase (24-168 hours). Secondary endpoints included CR in acute and overall phases, nausea severity, rescue medication use, adverse events, and patient satisfaction.

Interventions

Two antiemetic groups use placebo, dexamethasone and ondansetron. Three antiemetic groups use aprepitant, dexamethasone and ondansetron.

Sponsors

the Norman Bethune's Research Wing Promotion-Supporting Research Projects
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Peking Union Medical College Hospital Talent Cultivation Program
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Medical High Level Talents Program
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Research Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Masking description

Both patients and investigators, including follow-up staff, were blinded to treatment allocation.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
20 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Eligibility criteria: histologically confirmed gynecologic malignancies (including newly diagnosed cases and recurrent cases without chemo- or radiotherapy within the past six months); age 20-75 years; ECOG performance status 0-2; scheduled to receive at least two cycles of paclitaxel (175 mg/m²) plus carboplatin (AUC 5-6) every 3 weeks; and adequate organ function (bilirubin and creatinine within normal range, ALT and AST \< 2× upper limit of normal).

Exclusion criteria

included prior chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or targeted therapy for the current recurrence; known brain metastases or history of brain tumors; history of gastrointestinal malignancy or major gastrointestinal surgery (except polypectomy or appendectomy); incomplete bowel obstruction; vestibular dysfunction; massive ascites (unless drained); concomitant opioid use; or diabetes mellitus.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Complete response (CR) rate in the delayed period24 hours to 7days after chemotherapy (each cycle is 21 days)CR is defined as no emesis, no significant nausea (VAS ≤4, where 0 = none, 10= = most severe), and no use of rescue antiemetics.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
CR rates in the acute phase (0-24 hours) and overall phase (0-7 days).acute phase: within 24 hours after chemotherapy (each cycle is 21 days); overall phase: within 7 days after chemotherapy (each cycle is 21 days).CR rates in the acute phase (0-24 hours) and overall phase (0-7 days).
the use of rescue antiemeticwithin 7 days after chemotherapy (each cycle is 21 days).the use of rescue antiemetic (0-7 days)
patient satisfactionOn day 7 and 14 of each cycle (each cycle is 21 days).patient satisfaction assessed with a 7-point Likert-type scale (1=Very dissatisfied; 2=dissatisfied; 3=Relatively dissatisfied; 4=quite satisfied; 5=somewhat satisfied; 6=Satisfied; 7=Very satisfied)
AEswithin 7 days after chemotherapy (each cycle is 21 days).incidence of adverse events
severity of nauseawithin 7 days after chemotherapy (each cycle is 21 days).severity of nausea (VAS: 0 = none, 10 = most severe)

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026