Skip to content

Evaluation of Non-invasive Continuous Hemodynamic Measurement From Task Force CORE

Performance Evaluation of Non-invasive Continuous Hemodynamic Measurement From Task Force(R) CORE Versus Invasive Reference

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06007196
Enrollment
70
Registered
2023-08-23
Start date
2023-09-01
Completion date
2024-09-30
Last updated
2023-08-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiac Output, Hemodynamic Measurement, Non-invasive

Brief summary

Validation of hemodynamic measurements using the non-invasive Task Force Core(R) and Task Force Cardio(R) device with invasive hemodynamic measurements using the thermodilution technique (PICCO device).

Detailed description

The investigational device, Task Force® CORE (TFC, CNSystems Medizintechnik GmbH, Graz, Austria) together with the Task Force® CARDIO (TFCARDIO, CNSystems Medizintechnik GmbH, Graz, Austria) medical device software, is a new CE-marked medical device for continuous non-invasive determination of blood pressure (BP), cardiac output (CO) and derived parameters based on the well established CNAP® (continuous non-invasive arterial pressure) technology by CNSystems. The primary aim of this prospective, method comparison, open, multi-center study is data acquisition for the performance evaluation of the TFC in comparison with invasive reference methods (i.e. transpulmonary thermodilution, invasive blood pressure with radial artery catheter). The setting of the study will be the Operating Room (OR). This setting allows the comparison of the investigational device's cardiac output (CO) to invasive CO as well as of BP and derived hemodynamic parameters like Stroke Volume (SV), and Systemic Vascular Resistance (SVR). Measurements will be performed during the perioperative period, starting 15 minutes after the first skin incision.

Interventions

DEVICEnon-invasive device (Task Force CORE(R) and Task Force CARDIO(R)

Intraoperative cardiac output will be measured using the non-invasive device (Task Force CORE(R) and Task Force CARDIO(R) and will be compared with the invasive thermodilution method (PiCCO).

Sponsors

Medical University of Graz
CollaboratorOTHER
Medical University of Vienna
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients (patients aged at least 18 years) * Patients undergoing major abdominal surgery who require invasive extended hemodynamic monitoring (trans pulmonary thermodilution via PiCCO and invasive blood pressure monitoring with radial artery catheter) according to clinical standard of care * Patients with intact perfusion of both hands evidenced by a positive Allen's test * Patients given written informed consent to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with vascular impairments at the sites of non-invasive blood pressure measurement (fingers or upper arms) * Patients with significant edema in the fingers * Patients with ventricular assist devices or extracorporeal life-supporting devices * Subjects not passing the Allen's test for both hands * Patients who obtain vasoactive medications on the same arm as used for upper-arm Task Force blood pressure measurements * Patients with a large lateral difference in blood pressure (\> 15mmHg for systolic blood pressure and/or \>10 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure) or with same arm measurement differences \> 10 mmHg in systolic or diastolic blood pressure during assessment of lateral differences * Patients who, in addition to invasive blood pressure monitoring, require non-invasive blood pressure measurements unrelated to the investigational device

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in intraoperative cardiac output measurements between Task Force CORE compared with thermodilution during surgeryFor the duration of surgeryIntraoperative performance of cardiac output values derived by the Task Force CORE system compared with cardiac output measurements derived by thermodilution measurements.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Differences in intraoperative hemodynamic measurements (blood pressure in mmHg) between Task Force CORE compared with thermodilution during surgeryFor the duration of surgeryIntraoperative evaluation of the performance of Task Force variable blood pressure (in mmHg) throughout surgery compared to simultaneous invasive measurements.
Differences in intraoperative hemodynamic measurements (stroke volume in ml) between Task Force CORE compared with thermodilution during surgeryFor the duration of surgeryIntraoperative evaluation of the performance of Task Force variable stroke volume (in ml) throughout surgery compared to simultaneous invasive measurements.
Differences in intraoperative hemodynamic measurements (stroke volume variation in %) between Task Force CORE compared with thermodilution during surgeryFor the duration of surgeryIntraoperative evaluation of the performance of Task Force variable stroke volume variation (in %) throughout surgery compared to simultaneous invasive measurements.
Intraoperative continuous Cardioc Output measurementsFor the duration of surgeryThe comparison of intraoperative continuous cardiac output measurements derived by the Task Force device with continuous invasive cardiac output measurements derived by the PiCCO throughout surgery or before, during and after clinically indicated interventions (e.g. medication, passive leg raising, fluid challenge).

Countries

Austria

Contacts

Primary ContactChristian Reiterer, MD
christian.reiterer@meduniwien.ac.at+43 40400
Backup ContactAlexander Taschner, MD
alexander.taschner@meduniwien.ac.at+43 40400

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026