Skip to content

Neurophysiology of Fibromyalgia

Investigating the Neurobiological Contributions to Pain in Patients With Fibromyalgia

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06006130
Enrollment
36
Registered
2023-08-23
Start date
2024-02-01
Completion date
2025-12-31
Last updated
2026-06-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fibromyalgia

Keywords

fibromyalgia, transcranial magnetic stimulation, neuroplasticity, pain

Brief summary

Fibromyalgia is a syndrome associated with fatigue and chronic pain, leading to significant physical limitations and impaired quality of life. There are several challenges that complicate the diagnosis and management of fibromyalgia. The etiology is not well defined, as there are several proposed factors that may trigger the genesis of pain in fibromyalgia including physical and/or emotional life stressors, and genetic predispositions involving neuromodulator pathways. Chronic pain in fibromyalgia arises in the absence of tissue pathology, and consequently a lack of consensus on reliable diagnostic criteria. Understanding the neurophysiology of fibromyalgia would aid in the discovery of objective biomarkers for diagnosis. Therefore, the goals of this study are to: 1. Compare the neurophysiological responses in fibromyalgia compared to healthy controls. 2. Determine whether a two-week cTMS protocol will alter pain in individuals with fibromyalgia.

Detailed description

Fibromyalgia is a syndrome associated with fatigue and chronic pain, leading to significant physical limitations and impaired quality of life. Fibromyalgia affects 1.7% of Canadians, with a higher prevalence in females compared to males at 9:1 \[1\]. There are several challenges that complicate the diagnosis and management of fibromyalgia. The etiology is not well defined, as there are several proposed factors that may trigger the genesis of pain in fibromyalgia. Chronic pain in fibromyalgia arises in the absence of tissue pathology, and consequently a lack of consensus on reliable diagnostic criteria. Understanding the pathophysiology of fibromyalgia would aid in the identification of objective biomarkers that could be used for diagnosis. Multiple theories have been posited to explain the genesis of chronic pain. The gate control theory describes the attenuation of pain signals in the spinal cord prior to cortical processing, and it has been hypothesized that loss of this gate control leads to the genesis of chronic pain \[2\]. Gate control can be observed by reduction of afferent signals during active muscle contraction. For example, the amplitude of the somatosensory-evoked potential (SEP) is attenuated during active contraction \[3\]. To our knowledge, it is unknown whether such gate control is observed in fibromyalgia. The lack of gate control may contribute to chronic pain in this population. The sensorimotor theory suggests that incongruency between motor intention and sensory feedback underlies chronic pain where there is an absence of tissue pathology \[4\]. This may align with the genesis of fibromyalgia, given the findings that those with fibromyalgia have altered tactile and proprioceptive functioning \[5\]. Corticomuscular coherence (CMC) is a useful tool that uses electroencephalography (EEG) and electromyography (EMG) to probe the synchrony of neural firing between the brain and muscle \[6\]. To our knowledge, it is unknown how the magnitude of CMC varies in fibromyalgia compared to healthy controls. Non-invasive brain stimulation in the form of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) has been used to probe the activity of corticospinal and cortical networks in fibromyalgia. When TMS pulses are delivered in a repetitive train, a protocol known as repetitive TMS (rTMS), short-term neuroplasticity can be induced (i.e., a change in the activity of neurons in the brain). In fibromyalgia, Mhalla et al. \[7\] found that 5 days of 10 Hz rTMS reduced pain intensity and improved quality of life metrics. Controlled pulse parameter transcranial magnetic stimulation (cTMS) is a novel technique that may produce stronger analgesic effects by delivering monophasic pulses that could enhance neuroplasticity compared with conventional rTMS. It is unknown whether a longer intervention period or the use of cTMS could lead to greater analgesic effects. Finally, central sensitization may explain the widespread chronic pain experienced in fibromyalgia. There are several neuromodulators that contribute to the neurobiology of central sensitization and may be implicated in this condition including serotonin, dopamine, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). Serotonin is linked to pain modulation, such that increased levels of 5-HT are associated with hyperalgesia \[8\]. BDNF has been implicated in the genesis of neuropathic pain \[9\]. In fibromyalgia compared to healthy controls, serum BDNF levels have been reported to be higher \[10\]. Abnormal dopamine function may also be associated with fibromyalgia \[11\]. Positron-emission tomography (PET) studies show lower cortical dopamine D2/D3 binding availability in fibromyalgia compared to healthy controls \[12\]. Ultimately, a combination of events may lead to widespread chronic pain in fibromyalgia. Understanding the neurophysiology of fibromyalgia would aid in the discovery of objective biomarkers for diagnosis. Therefore, the goals of this study are to: 1. Compare the neurophysiological responses in fibromyalgia compared to healthy controls. 2. Determine whether a two-week cTMS protocol will alter pain in individuals with fibromyalgia.

Interventions

DEVICEActive Controlled Pulse Parameter Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (cTMS)

cTMS is a non-invasive, non-painful procedure used to relieve chronic pain and promote short-term changes. The first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle of the left motor cortex will be targeted using neuronavigation software. 2000 pulses will be delivered at 10 Hz stimulation. Stimulation will be delivered at 80% of the resting motor threshold obtained from the right FDI muscle. The delivery of cTMS requires 11 minutes in total.

DEVICESham Controlled Pulse Parameter Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (cTMS)

A sham coil will be utilized for the sham cTMS condition. It is important to note that from the participant perspective, the sham stimulation will feel and sound identical to active. The location and all other parameters of Sham cTMS will be identical to Active cTMS.

Sponsors

McMaster University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Experiment 1: Outcomes assessor will be blinded to the groups (fibromyalgia vs controls) the data is obtained from Experiment 2: Outcomes assessor and participants will be blinded to the intervention group that participants are allocated to (sham vs real treatment)

Intervention model description

Experiment 1: Response to real intervention compared between fibromyalgia and healthy control group Experiment 2: Fibromyalgia participants allocated to real or sham intervention

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* 18-65 years old

Exclusion criteria

* contraindications to TMS * chronic pain associated with diagnoses other than fibromyalgia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in PROMIS-29 v2.0 ProfileExperiment 1: At baseline pre-intervention, Experiment 2: At baseline pre-intervention and 2 weeks post-interventionUsing numerical rating (0 to 5) to assess the change in seven health domains including physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbances, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and pain interference. Each category consists of 4 questions. Also uses a numerical rating to asses pain intensity (0-10).
Change in Fibromyalgia impact questionnaire (FIQ)Experiment 1: At baseline pre-intervention, Experiment 2: At baseline pre-intervention and 2 weeks post-interventionThis instrument will be used to assess the patients feeling and emotion related to their pain experience.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Pain catastrophizing scale-EN-SFExperiment 1: At baseline pre-intervention, Experiment 2: At baseline pre-intervention and 2 weeks post-interventionWill be used to assess the patients feeling and emotion related to their pain experience
Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4)Experiment 1: At baseline pre-intervention, Experiment 2: At baseline pre-intervention and 2 weeks post-interventionWill be used to assess for symptoms of for Major Depressive Disorder and Generalized Anxiety Disorder
Change in Short-form Posttraumatic Checklist-5 (Short-form PCL-5)Experiment 1: At baseline pre-intervention, Experiment 2: At baseline pre-intervention and 2 weeks post-interventionWill be used to screen for symptoms of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
Change in Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs)Experiment 1: At baseline pre-intervention and immediately following 1 treatment session, Experiment 2: At baseline pre-intervention and 2 weeks post-interventionThis will include an assessments of MEPs obtained using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS).
Change in Short-Interval Intracortical Inhibition (SICI)Experiment 1: At baseline pre-intervention and immediately following 1 treatment session, Experiment 2: At baseline pre-intervention and 2 weeks post-interventionThis will include an assessments of SICI obtained using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS).
Change in performance on sensorimotor tasksExperiment 1: At baseline pre-intervention, Experiment 2: At baseline pre-intervention and 2 weeks post-interventionTasks include tactile localization, temporal order judgement (TOJ), and sequential amplitude discrimination
EEG assessment of Somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs)Experiment 1: At baseline pre-intervention onlyThis will include an assessment of SEPs using EEG electrodes.
EEG assessment of Pain-related evoked potentials (PREPs)Experiment 1: At baseline pre-intervention onlyThis will include an assessment of PREPs using EEG electrodes.
EEG assessment of Corticomuscular coherence (CMC)Experiment 1: At baseline pre-intervention onlyThis will include an assessment of CMC using EEG electrodes.
EEG assessment of Event-related desynchronization (ERD)Experiment 1: At baseline pre-intervention onlyThis will include an assessment of ERD using EEG electrodes.

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 5, 2026