Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide Combined With Azacitidine vs Azacitidine in the Treatment of MDS-RS

A Prospective Single-center Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide Combined With Azacitidine vs Azacitidine in the Treatment of MDS-RS

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06004765
Enrollment
138
Registered
2023-08-22
Start date
2023-08-31
Completion date
2025-08-31
Last updated
2023-08-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Brief summary

At present, the main therapies for myelodysplastic syndromes with ring sideroblasts (MDS-RS) are red blood cell and platelet transfusion, erythropoietin (EPO), androgen, and iron chelation therapy. Lenalidomide is an immunomodulator with multiple mechanisms, including direct targeting of MDS clones, immunomodulation, erythropoiesis restoration, and angiogenesis inhibition. A Phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of oral azacitidine (AZA) in lower-risk MDS reported higher rates of hemoglobin and platelet hematological improvement in patients with AZA monotherapy. Therefore, this study intended to investigate the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide and sequential AZA in the treatment of refractory MDS-RS versus azacitidine monotherapy.

Detailed description

Myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) are heterogeneous clonal disorders of stem cells that result in peripheral blood cytopenia and ineffective hematopoiesis, with the potential risk of the development of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Most patients with myelodysplastic syndromes with ring sideroblasts (MDS-RS) are stratified into lower-risk groups by the revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS). At present, the main therapies for MDS-RS are red blood cell and platelet transfusion, erythropoietin (EPO), androgen, and iron chelation therapy. Lenalidomide is an immunomodulator with multiple mechanisms, including direct targeting of MDS clones, immunomodulation, erythropoiesis restoration, and angiogenesis inhibition. Hypomethylating agents (HMA) like azacytidine (AZA) and decitabine (DEC), have been shown to improve survival or delay disease progression in high-risk MDS. A Phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of oral AZA in lower-risk MDS reported higher rates of hemoglobin and platelet hematological improvement in patients with AZA monotherapy (24.3% vs 6.5%). Therefore, this study intended to investigate the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide and sequential azacitidine in the treatment of refractory MDS-RS versus azacitidine monotherapy.

Interventions

DRUGLenalidomide

10mg/d \*21 days, 28 days for 1 course

DRUGAzacitidine

75mg/m2/d\*5 days, 28 days for 1 course

Sponsors

Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age \>18 years old. 2. Patients with a definite diagnosis of MDS-RS and stratified as lower-risk according to IPSS-R. 3. After at least 3 months of rhEPO treatment, with hemoglobin\<90g/L, absolute neutrophil count≥1.0× 109 /L, and platelet≥30× 109 /L 4. Unconditional hematopoietic stem cell transplantation 5. Adequate hepatic functions with alanine transaminase (ALT)/aspartate. transaminase (AST) levels within 2 times of the normal upper limit and total bilirubin levels within 2 times of the normal upper limit. 5\. No active infection; Not pregnant or breastfeeding 6. ECOG≦2 with an expected life span of more than 6 months 7. Documented patient consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. Proliferative (white blood cell count ≥12× 109 /L) chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. 2. Complicated with active or uncontrolled infections. 3. Complicated with other malignancies. 4. Creatinine/transaminase ≥ 2 normal upper limit. 5. Complicated with myelofibrosis.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
overall response rate (ORR)3, 6 monthsProportion of patients achieved complete response, partial response, and hematological improvement.
complete response rate3, 6 monthsProportion of patients achieved complete response.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
relapse free survival (RFS)3, 6, 12, 24 monthsRelapse free survival will be calculated from the date of response to the date of first recorded relapse or death from any cause.
Overall survival (OS)3, 6, 12, 24 monthsOS is calculated for all patients from the date of initial registration to the date of death from any cause.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactBing Han
hanbing_li@sina.com.cn13601059938

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026