Anxiety, Choice Behavior, Health Behavior, Health-Related Behavior, Healthy Diet, Healthy Lifestyle, Healthy Nutrition, Loneliness
Conditions
Keywords
Planetary Health, Eco-Friendly Behavior, Eco-Anxiety, Covid-19
Brief summary
The aim of this 3-phase study is the evaluation of planetary health behaviors and its cognitive processes in relation to levels of eco-anxiety, general well-being, and levels of loneliness. As climate change progresses at a dangerous rate, it is important to establish and maintain lifestyles that are productive, fulfilling, environmentally conscious, and low in anxiety. Through a better understanding of the interconnected nature of planetary health behaviors with other aspects of healthy living and perception of social isolation, and the effect of an intervention, this research will add to current state of science to help inform the creation of interventions promoting sustainable, healthy, happy living among the general public and specific subgroups.
Detailed description
The aim of this study with three phases is the evaluation of healthy behaviors and its cognitive processes, and anxiety levels in relation to selected physical, mental, and environmental health aspects by means of online survey in (1) general population and (2) rehabiliation setting as well as with (3) an experimental design with students/ see section "Arms and Interventions". The umbrella terminology of "planetary health" is used in the context of this study. As climate change progresses at a dangerous rate, it is important to establish and maintain lifestyles that are productive, fulfilling, environmentally conscious, and low in anxiety and stress. By evaluating prevalence of healthy behaviors and levels of eco-anxiety as well as loneliness as one early indicator of health risk, this study hopes to build on existing public health knowledge to develop interventions targeting and encouraging multiple aspects of healthy, eco-friendly lifestyles. This study will also help later intervention design by determining effective methods of persuasion and promotion of sustainable planetary health behaviors. Main research questions are \*Phase 1/general population\* I. Is climate-awareness (in terms of EMCB, YCSCB and Mindful Health) more likely to also increase motivation to promote own health (in terms of physical activity and healthy nutrition)? \*Phase 1/general population\* II. What is the (non-)linear relationship between eco-anxiety and climate-sensitiveness/health behavior? \*Phase 1/general population and Phase 2/rehabiliation setting\* III. Is climate-sensitiveness and eco-anxiety invariant to socio-demographic variables such as clinic, gender, occupation, and age? (No differences) \*Phase 2/rehabiliation setting\* IV. To what extent are pattern in medical rehabilitation different from the general population? \*Phase 3/students and experiment-based\* VI. Does priming eco-anxiety lead individuals to process eco-health-related decisions more deliberately and to make more decisions beneficial to eco-health? \*Phase 3/students and experiment-based\* VII. Is an intervention leading individuals to make more behavioral decisions beneficial to personal and ecological health? \*Phase 3/students and experiment-based\* VIII. Does environmental anxiety induction interact with ROC-T intervention? How does ecological anxiety initiation or intervention effect manifest through changes in the parameters of the drift-diffusion model to reflect changes in the decision-making process? \*Phase 3/students and experiment-based\* IX. Do the observed effects on personal health decisions extend (transfer) to the ecological choice domain?
Interventions
BEHAVIORALRegulation Of Craving Training (ROC-T)
Participants read a 5-minute article on food and ecological health describing the environmental impacts of food choices and actions to support planetary health. During a subsequent choice task, participants received prompts to recall article content and self-monitor their selections.
BEHAVIORALControl group
Control participants read a time-matched article unrelated to sustainability (no multi-domain pro-environmental behaviors including transportation, consumption, and daily activities; just on the beauty of the German nature) and completed the choice task without recall prompts.
Sponsors
Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Ability to participate in surveys (e.g., sufficient German or English language skills)
Exclusion criteria
* Not being of age * Illiteracy * Massively limited cognitive abilities (linguistic components of the digital offerings must be able to be used and questionnaires completed or interviews participated in)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Young Consumers' Sustainable Consumption Behaviors (YCSCB) validated scale | This scale will take approximately 2 minutes to fill out completely. | The primary outcome measure will be the YCSCB validated scale questionnaire. This will be given to participants right after they have completed the intervention section of the survey. The answering options range from "Never" (0, minimum score) to "Sometimes" (1) and "Often" (2) up to "Always" (3, maximum score). The items are worded 1. I eat meat (steak, ham, etc.). 2. I eat dairy products (butter, cheese, yoghurt, etc.). 3. I keep a healthy diet. 4. There are times when I discard food products. 5. I buy locally grown food products. 6. I reuse my leftovers for the next meal. and items # 1, 2 and 4 need to be reversed, then all items can be used as single items or as aggregated scales, with higher scores indicating a better outcome in terms of planetary health. |
| Ethically Minded Consumer Behavior (EMCB) validated scale | This scale will take approximately 2 minutes to fill out completely. | The second primary outcome measure will be the EMCB validated scale questionnaire. This will be given to participants right after they have completed the intervention section of the survey. The answering options range from "Never true" (0, minimum score) to "Rarely true" (1), "Sometimes true" (2), "Mostly true" (3) and "Always true" (4, maximum score). The items are worded (for instance) 1. When there is a choice, I always choose the product that contributes to the least amount of environmental damage. 2\. I have switched products for environmental reasons. 3. If I understand the potential damage to the environment that some products can cause, I do not purchase those products. ... 10. I have paid more for socially responsible products when there is a cheaper alternative. All items can be used as single items or as aggregated scales, with higher scores indicating a better outcome in terms of planetary health. |
| Loneliness item from the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression-(CES D)-Scale | This item will take less than 1 minute to complete. | To study some of the research questions unrelated to the intervention, the perceived social isolation is measured with a standardized scale building on the item in the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression-(CES-D)-Scale. The item is worded "How often did you feel lonely?" with the answering options "Daily" (3), "Several times a week" (2), "Once a week" (1) and "Rarely/never" (0). The item can be used as single items, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome in terms of more loneliness. |
Countries
Germany
Contacts
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORSonia Lippke, Dr.
Constructor University
Outcome results
None listed