Heart Failure
Conditions
Keywords
Heart Failure, HFrEF, patient management, quality of care, quality indicators
Brief summary
This was a multicenter, non-randomized, non-interventional cohort study with prospective and retrospective collection of primary data on heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patient treatment and care following a decompensation event in different types of Heart Failure Unit (HFU) or non-HFU centers across Germany.
Detailed description
This study aimed to describe quality of care of HFrEF patients following a decompensation event in different center types (=settings) utilizing the quality indicators for the care and outcomes of adults with heart failure as specified by the Heart Failure Association in 2022. No strict visit schedule was imposed on participants to avoid interference with routine clinical care. HFrEF patients were treated according to the local routine in terms of medication, visit frequency and types of assessments performed and only these data was collected as part of the study from patient files.
Interventions
OTHERHeart Failure medications
There was no treatment allocation. Patients were allocated to the respective cohort based on the treating physician enrolling them in the study. Patients were treated according to the local prescribing information and routine medical practice.
Sponsors
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
OTHER
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. Patients who provide written informed consent to participate in the study 2. Male or female patients ≥ 18 years of age 3. Patients with diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and HF treatment according to the summaries of product characteristics (SmPCs) 4. Decompensation event up to three months prior to inclusion
Exclusion criteria
1. Simultaneous or planned participation in an interventional research study 2. Participation in this study at another site e.g. in a HFU network 3. Patients incapable of understanding and signing the informed consent form
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Quality of care and guideline adoption score in different structural settings as assessed by an opportunity-based quality indicator (QI) composite endpoint | 6 months | Quality of care and guideline adoption score in different structural settings as assessed by an opportunity-based QI composite endpoint defined by the number of times each of secondary endpoints has been accomplished divided by chances to accomplish them as average per center type. To describe the quality of Heart Failure (HF) patient care in Heart Failure Unit (HFU) and non-HFU centers utilizing QIs as suggested by the 2021 European Society of Cardiology HF guideline. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of sites with dedicated trained healthcare professionals to deliver HF specific education to facilitate patient self-care. | Baseline | To describe the structural framework of the participating centers. |
| (A) Proportion of patients with HF who have a documentation of their HF clinical type | Baseline | HF clinical type: Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), HF with a midrange ejection fraction (HFmrEF), HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). To describe the patient assessment in different types of HFU and non-HFU centers. |
| (B) Proportion of patients with a documentation of their electrocardiogram findings | 6 months | To describe the patient assessment in different types of HFU and non-HFU centers. |
| (C) Proportion of patients who have their natriuretic peptides (NPs) measured (within a 3-month period from the time of decompensation) | 3 months | To describe the patient assessment in different types of HFU and non-HFU centers. |
| (D) Proportion of patients who have their blood tests documented | 3 months | To describe the patient assessment in different types of HFU and non-HFU centers. |
| (E) Proportion of patients hospitalized with HF who have been referred for a cardiac rehabilitation program | 6 months | To describe the patient assessment in different types of HFU and non-HFU centers. |
| (F) Proportion of patients hospitalized with HF who have a follow-up review by a healthcare professional within 4 weeks of hospital discharge | 4 weeks | To describe the patient assessment in different types of HFU and non-HFU centers. |
| (G) Proportion of patients treated with beta-blocker bisoprolol, carvedilol, sustained-release metoprolol succinate, or nebivolol in the absence of any contraindications as defined by Aktaa et al 2022 | 6 months | To describe the initial treatment algorithm of HFrEF patients following a decompensation in different types of HFU and non-HFU centers. |
| (H) Proportion of patients treated with an Angiotensin-converting enzymes (ACE) inhibitor, Angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) or Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) in the absence of any contraindications | 6 months | To describe the initial treatment algorithm of HFrEF patients following a decompensation in different types of HFU and non-HFU centers. |
| (I) Proportion of patients treated with an Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) in the absence of any contraindications | 6 months | To describe the initial treatment algorithm of HFrEF patients following a decompensation in different types of HFU and non-HFU centers. |
| (J) Proportion of patients treated with a Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor in the absence of any contraindications | 6 months | To describe the initial treatment algorithm of HFrEF patients following a decompensation in different types of HFU and non-HFU centers. |
| Proportion of patients receiving ARNI instead of ACEi/ARB as first-line treatment | 6 months | To describe the initial treatment algorithm of HFrEF patients following a decompensation in different types of HFU and non-HFU centers. |
| Proportion of sites with a dedicated multidisciplinary team to manage patients with HF | Baseline | To describe the structural framework of the participating centers. |
| Time to treatment of the above 4 individual treatment classes and time to treatment with all four classes together | 6 months | To describe the initial treatment algorithm of HFrEF patients following a decompensation in different types of HFU and non-HFU centers. |
| Percentage of days covered with all four treatment classes | 6 months | To describe the initial treatment algorithm of HFrEF patients following a decompensation in different types of HFU and non-HFU centers. |
| (K) Proportion of symptomatic patients with HFrEF in sinus rhythm with a QRS duration ≥150ms and left bundle branch block QRS morphology and with LVEF ≤35% despite ≥3 months optimal medical therapy who are offered cardiac resynchronization therapy | 6 months | To describe the therapy optimization in different types of HFU and non-HFU centers. |
| (L) Proportion of symptomatic patients with HF, LVEF ≤35% despite ≥3 months of optimal medical therapy, and ischemic heart disease (IHD) who are offered primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator | 6 months | To describe the therapy optimization in different types of HFU and non-HFU centers. |
| Proportion of patients who have an assessment of their Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using a validated tool | 6 months | To describe the utilization of HRQoL assessments in different types of HFU and non-HFU centers. |
| Number of patients who are eligible for and have accomplished secondary endpoint g-j divided by the number of patients who are eligible for g-j | 6 months | To describe quality of treatment utilizing an all-or-none composite QI. |
| Number of HF hospitalizations, stratified by bed type | 6 months | Where a patient had multiple HF hospitalization stays, each hospitalization was counted. To describe healthcare resource utilization in patients hospitalized with HF during 6 months follow-up. |
| Length of hospital stay | 6 months | Length of hospital stay was considered as the time from admission date until discharge for each HF hospitalization. To describe healthcare resource utilization in patients hospitalized with HF during 6 months follow-up. |
| Number of HF hospitalizations per patient | 6 months | To describe healthcare resource utilization in patients hospitalized with HF during 6 months follow-up. |
| Number of newly implanted devices | 6 months | implanted devices: implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), combination of ICD and CRT (CRT-D). To describe healthcare resource utilization in patients hospitalized with HF during 6 months follow-up. |
| Number of valve interventions | 6 months | To describe healthcare resource utilization in patients hospitalized with HF during 6 months follow-up. |
| Number of participants with medical history of selected comorbidities | Baseline | To describe the HFrEF patient population with a recent decompensation |
| Proportion of patients with HF who are prescribed loop diuretic therapy if they have evidence of fluid retention | 6 months | To describe the initial treatment algorithm of HFrEF patients following a decompensation in different types of HFU and non-HFU centers. |
Countries
Germany
Outcome results
None listed