Skip to content

Mindfulness and Behavior Change to Improve Cardiovascular Health of Older People With HIV

Mindfulness and Behavior Change to Improve Cardiovascular Health of Older People With HIV

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06001814
Acronym
OM-OH
Enrollment
50
Registered
2023-08-21
Start date
2025-07-21
Completion date
2028-08-31
Last updated
2025-09-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiovascular Diseases, Hiv

Brief summary

Older people with HIV (OPWH) are disproportionately impacted by cardiovascular disease (CVD) attributable to behavioral risk factors, and chronic HIV immune dysregulation resulting inflammation. Systemic inflammation is exacerbated by psychological distress via activating the immune response and driving pro-inflammatory CVD risk behaviors. There is promising evidence to suggest that mindfulness could be an effective intervention to reduce psychological distress and support behaviorally- and inflammatory-mediated CVD risk reduction. This project aims to refine and synthesize mindfulness and behavior change content from evidence-based protocols (mindfulness-based stress reduction and diabetes prevention program) to develop and pilot test a new text message-enhanced intervention called One Mind One Heart (OM-OH) using feedback from semi-structured interviews with OPWH in psychological distress (N=20), and my multidisciplinary mentorship team (Aim 1). An open pilot (N=5) with exit interviews and pre-post self-report assessments, will inform the initial acceptability of OM-OH and further refine OM-OH as needed (Aim 2). Finally, a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT; N=50) will be conducted to a.) evaluate benchmarks of feasibility and acceptability of study methods and refined OM-OH compared to enhanced usual care, and b.) investigate potential for effects on psychological distress, inflammation, and behavioral CVD risk (Aim 3). Findings will provide the foundation for an R01 application to conduct an efficacy trial of OM-OH to reduce inflammatory-mediated CVD risk among OPWH.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALOne-Mind One-Heart

One-Mind One-Heart will include mindfulness and behavior change skills to address psychological distress, physical activity, diet, and substance use.

OTHEREducation

Education will be provided on behavioral cardiovascular disease risk reduction strategies, such as increasing physical activity, reducing salt intake in diet, and reduce/stop alcohol and tobacco-use.

Sponsors

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
CollaboratorNIH
Massachusetts General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. age ≥50 years 2. clinical diagnosis of HIV per medical record or provision of current antiretroviral medication prescription 3. viral suppression - i.e., lower than detectable limit - per medical record or provision of viral load test from the past six months 4. current elevated psychological distress (score ≥10 on 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale \[K10\]) screener) 5. ≥1 CVD risk factor (based on ACC/AHA Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk Score Calculator; e.g., diabetes, current smoker, hypertension, and high cholesterol 6. access to cell phone with text messaging capabilities

Exclusion criteria

1. non-English-speaking 2. cognitive impairments preventing informed consent 3. untreated or under-treated serious mental illness (i.e., psychosis and bipolar disorder) based on clinical interview

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility of recruitmentBaseline (pre-intervention)70% or more of participants consent to screening, meet screening criteria, are eligible, and agree to participate in the study
Feasibility of eligibility criteriaBaseline (pre-intervention)Less than 20% of participants are ineligible due to each criterion
Feasibility of randomizationPre-intervention70% or more of participants are randomized and complete the first intervention session
Feasibility of the OM-OM interventionDuration of intervention70% or more of participants attend all sessions and complete all homework
Feasibility of research assessmentsDuration of intervention; 0 and 12-week follow-up70% or more of weekly and follow-up research assessments are completed
Feasibility of blood drawsBaseline; 12-week follow-up70% of more are collected
Acceptability of OM-OH intervention0-weeks post-interventionRating of 7.5 or greater/10 on: session satisfaction, helpfulness, and utility; overall program satisfaction; plan to use the skills; and would recommend the intervention program to a friend
Acceptability of text-enhanced delivery0-weeks post-interventionRating of 7.5 or greater/10 on: ease, and confidence of use; and rating of 2 or less/10 on interference of technical problems
Acceptability of blood draws0- and 12-weeks post-interventionRating of 7.5 or greater/10 on ease of collection; and rating of 2 or less/10 on pain

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Inflammation Biomarkers0- and 12-weeks post-interventionInterleukin-6 and C-reactive protein measured in picograms per milliliter of blood
Dietary Risk Assessment (DRA)0 and 12-weeks post-interventionThe DRA assesses dietary patterns. A total DRA score and 4 subscales (Nuts, Oils, Dressings, and Spreads; Vegetables, Fruit, Whole Grains, and Beans; Drinks, Desserts, Snacks, Eating Out, and Salt; and Fish, Meat, Poultry, Dairy, and Eggs) can be derived. Subscales are scored independently by assigning score values accordingly: 2 for response choices in the Desirable column; 1 for response choices in the Could be improved column; and 0 for response choices in the Needs to be improved column. Sum the 4 subscales to obtain a total DRA score ranging 0 to 46. For all scoring, a higher score represents a more healthful dietary pattern.
Five Factor Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ)0 and 12-weeks post-interventionThe FFQ assesses trait mindfulness.There are five sub scales: observing, describing, acting with awareness, non-judging, and non-reactivity. The FFMQ sub scale summary scores can be calculated by dividing the total in each category by the number of items in that category. The FFMQ sum score can be divided by 39 to get an average item score. Higher scores indicated greater trait mindfulness.
Fagerstrom Test For Nicotine Dependence (FTND)0 and 12-weeks post-interventionThe FTND assesses dependence on nicotine. Scores for all item are summed. Scores of �1-2: low dependence; 3-4 low to moderate dependence; 5-7 moderate dependence; 8+ high dependence.
Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 (PHQ-9)0 and 12-weeks post-interventionPHQ-9 assesses depressive symptoms. Total scores of 5, 10, 15, and 20 represent cutpoints for mild, moderate, moderately severe and severe depressive symptoms, respectively.
Generalized Anxiety Disorder - 7 (GAD-7)0 and 12-weeks post-interventionGAD-7 assesses anxiety symptoms. Total scores of 5, 10, and 15 represent cut points for mild, moderate, and severe anxiety symptoms, respectively.
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)0 and 12-weeks post-interventionThe PSS assessed perceived stress. Scores on the PSS range from 0 to 40 with higher scores indicating higher perceived stress. Scores ranging from 0-13 would be considered low stress. Scores ranging from 14-26 would be considered moderate stress. Scores ranging from 27-40 would be considered high perceived stress.
HIV/AIDS Stress Scale0 and 12-weeks post-interventionThe HIV/AIDS Stress Scale assesses HIV-related stress. The total score ranges from 0-68, with higher scores indicating higher levels of HIV-related stress.
Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test - Concise (AUDIT-C)0 and 12-weeks post-interventionThe AUDIT-C is scored on a scale of 0-12 (scores of 0 reflect no alcohol use). In men, a score of 4 or more is considered positive for hazardous drinking; in women, a score of 3 or more is considered positive for hazardous drinking. Generally, the higher the AUDIT-C score, the more likely it is that the patient's drinking is affecting his/her health and safety.
Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior Questionnaire (PASBQ)0 and 12-weeks post-interventionThe PASBQ assesses frequency and time spent in physical activity and sedentary behaviors. These time will be compared to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to determine if current guidelines are being met (yes/no) for 150 minutes of moderate aerobic activity (or 75 minutes of vigorous aerobic activity) and 2 or more days of muscle strengthening activities.

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactJacklyn Foley, PhD
jdfoley@mgh.harvard.edu857-347-5312

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026