HIV, Risk Reduction Behavior, Violence, Domestic, Violence, Gender-Based
Conditions
Keywords
LGBTQ, HIV Prevention, Transgender research, Peer counseling, Intimate Partner Violence (IPV), PrEP
Brief summary
The purpose of this clinical trial is to evaluate and test a newly developed gender-affirming intervention that addresses the dual and interconnected risks of HIV and intimate partner victimization (IPV) among transgender women (TW). The main questions it aims to answer are: (1) will the study intervention reduce HIV risk within the context of IPV and related risk factors (e.g., substance use and PTSD); (2) will STARS improve primary prevention behaviors, such as condom use, pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use, and repeat HIV testing; and (3) what are the mechanisms of change relevant to the theoretical foundations of the intervention, including gender affirmation, empowerment, and self-efficacy. The findings from this study will provide the necessary groundwork to examine the efficacy of this combined HIV-IPV intervention in a future, large-scale clinical trial. There are several components to this research study: * First, participants will be asked to complete a series of screening interviews/questionnaires to determine eligibility, including completing a HIV test. * If eligible, participants will then take part in a 2-3 hour baseline assessment consisting of both interviewer administered questionnaires as well as self-administered surveys. * Participants will then be randomly assigned to one of two treatment conditions: (1) a newly developed gender affirming intervention, known as Program STARS (Supporting Trans Affirmation, relationships, and Sex) or (2) a time-matched, attention-controlled program that offers free training in relaxation and stress reduction techniques (a.k.a., the comparison group). Both interventions offer unique components and the researchers do not yet know the impact the programs may have on participants' overall well-being. * Participants randomized to Project STARS, will be invited to complete a semi-structured exit interview (lasting 60-90 min.) after the completion of the program. * This clinical trial has three follow-up assessments: (1) post-intervention (i.e., after the peer-counseling programs are complete); (2) at 4-months follow-up; and (3) at 6-months follow-up. The follow-up assessments are structured the same way as the baseline assessment and are estimated to take around 1-2 hours. The total study involvement for this clinical trial is estimated to take approximately 10 to 12 hours over the course of six months.
Detailed description
Transgender women (TW) are among the populations most heavily affected by HIV in the United States (US), with nearly 1 in 5 TW living with HIV. The risk for HIV in TW often occurs in the context of intimate partner relationships. Moreover, in the context of these partnerships, TW are at elevated risk for intimate partner victimization (IPV). There is a strong link between IPV and HIV risk. IPV risk is amplified in TW who have a history of IPV or are in an abusive primary relationship. Thus, IPV and HIV as well as other sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are interconnected public health problems facing TW. Despite the dual and interconnected risks of HIV and IPV among TW, there are few empirically based HIV prevention interventions that target TW and none that target HIV risks related to IPV in this population. This overall research study is a 3-phase project (NIH R34MH119968). In Phase 1, researchers conducted focus groups with TW and community-based service providers to identify specific strategies for a brief health educational counseling intervention to support safety and HIV risk reduction among TW who have experienced recent IPV and HIV risk. Phase 1 data collection activities and preliminary analyses have been completed, and a full draft intervention protocol was produced based on Phase 1 findings. Phase 2 of this study involved conducting an open pilot trail (OP) of the full draft intervention protocol with 5 participants, using quantitative (i.e. surveys) and qualitative (i.e. individual interviews) methods to gain experience delivering the protocol and obtaining critical feedback on the intervention protocol, procedures and assessments. This knowledge has informed finalizing the intervention and assessment protocols, which will be used in the subsequent and final Phase 3 of the study. Phase 3 (the clinical trial registered here), involves conducting a pilot, two-arm Randomized Control Trial (RCT) to evaluate the program's ability to increase knowledge of HIV and HIV risk factors and reduce risk of intimate partner victimization among participants. The two treatment conditions used in this clinical trial are: (1) a newly developed gender affirming intervention, known as Program STARS (Supporting Trans Affirmation, relationships, and Sex) - detailed below and (2) a time-matched, attention-controlled program that offers free training in relaxation and stress reduction techniques (a.k.a., the comparison group). Participants will first complete a multi-step screening process to determine eligibility. If eligible, enrolled participants will then complete a 2-3 hour baseline assessment that can be conducted in-person or over Zoom. Assessments consist of interviewer administered safety measures as well as self-report online questionnaires. After completing the baseline assessment, participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two intervention arms. Assessments will also be conducted post-intervention as well as at 4-months and 6-months follow up. Participants who were randomized to the study intervention arm (i.e., the STARS Program) will also be invited to complete a 60-90 minute semi-structured exit interview via Zoom to provide qualitative feedback on the program. The overall purpose of this study is to develop a brief intervention that concurrently targets HIV and IPV risk, as well as addresses inter-related risks of HIV and IPV (e.g., substance use and PTSD) for TW - referred to as Supporting Transwomen Affirmation, Relationships and Sex (STARS). Program STARS will: * Be based on the Gender Affirmation Framework, which emphasizes interpersonal processes to positively affirm the identities and unique needs of TW. * Integrate a trauma-informed empowerment approach. * Include gender-affirming and empowering HIV prevention counseling that addresses HIV risk within the context of IPV and related risk factors (e.g., substance use and PTSD), and a range of HIV risk reduction options. * Provide TW with behavioral skills and resources for addressing IPV and maximizing personal safety. The aims of this treatment development research are to: 1. Develop a behavioral intervention manual that addresses the specific and unique HIV prevention needs of TW with IPV, and that uses a gender-affirmative, empowering, and trauma-informed approach; and 2. Evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, safety, and initial effects of STARS through three phases of intervention development. Researchers are primarily interested in exploring the pattern of results for any evidence of support for the intervention's influence on the primary and secondary outcomes, which are listed below. Primary Outcomes: 1. Composite Risk for HIV (CR-HIV) is a binary indicator of any HIV risk (e.g., yes=1 vs. no=0), which is an algorithm based on whether the participant: * report condomless anal sex with a HIV serodiscordant or status-unknown primary or other partner in the past 3 months; * is using PrEP; * is in a monogamous partnership with an HIV-uninfected partner or an ; * is in a monogamous partnership with an HIV-infected partner who is virally suppressed. * If participants are not certain about the latter two indicators, they are coded as having HIV risk according to this algorithm. 2. IPV frequency will be assessed with: * The Composite Abuse Scale revised short form (CASr-SF).and * A trans-specific IPV Scale (T-IPV Scale; Peitzmeier et al, in press) that assesses IPV unique to TW (e.g., being forced not pursuing aspects of gender transition that you wanted). 3. IPV safety will be assessed with the: * Measure Of Victim Empowerment Related to Safety (MOVERS; Goodman et al., 2015), which is a 13-item scale that measures IPV survivors' safety-related psychosocial skills and efficacy and expectations of support, as well as the extent to which survivors feel that their efforts to achieve safety might create new difficulties. Secondary Outcomes: * Biologically determined STI diagnoses, including HIV - The research staff will work with participants to find gender-affirming health care clinics in their area that provide free or low-cost STI and HIV testing. Participants will be encouraged to get tested for STIs as part of the research study; however, STI testing is not a requirement for participation. HIV self-test kits will be mailed to willing participants and the research staff will walk participants through testing procedures as well as post-test result counseling (as needed) over Zoom or in-person. * Self-reported discrete behavioral risk indicators: CAS, multiple and concurrent partnerships, partners' HIV status, monogamy and sexual agreements, substance use including injection drug use, HIV testing behaviors (including self-testing) and knowledge, intentions to use PrEP, PrEP uptake, use of any HIV prevention services, and use of any additional IPV-related services/resources. Long-term aim: The findings from this R34 intervention development study will provide the groundwork to examine the efficacy of STARS in a future, large-scale clinical trial, which can be readily implemented in real-world settings. Dissemination * Throughout the study, researchers will disseminate process reports and descriptive summaries of the findings to colleagues at social service and medical/health agencies with whom we established MOUs. * As data are evaluated, researchers will prepare brief reports describing the major findings from the study which we will share with our community partners, HIV prevention and IPV scientists, and TW health and advocacy organizations through publications and presentations at professional conferences.
Interventions
See description to the left.
See description to the left.
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
All research staff conducting participant assessments will remain blinded to group assignment. Randomization procedures will be conducted by a high level researcher (co-investigator responsible for clinical supervision).
Intervention model description
The methodological approach includes a 2-arm trial of Project STARS vs. a time matched, attention-controlled comparison group, with up to n=20 per arm (total Phase 3 sample size = up to 40 participants enrolled and randomized). The study is intended to evaluate the impacts of STARS on the specified outcomes.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* 18+ years old; * Assigned male at birth but identify as female, transgender, or transfeminine; * Endorse at least one IPV incident during the previous 12 months based on the trans-specific IPV Scale (T-IPV Scale; Peitzmeier et al, in press); * Report at least one instance of condomless anal sex in the last 6 months.
Exclusion criteria
* Have been diagnosed with HIV or test positive for HIV.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Feasibility of Online STARS as Measured by Retention Rates. | Post-intervention, 4-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up | One measure of feasibility will be participant retention rates, as measured by engagement/completion of the interventions. |
| Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Frequency: Composite Abuse Scale Revised Short Form (CASr-SF) | Post-intervention, 4-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up | Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Frequency was measured using the Composite Abuse Scale Revised-Short Form (CASr-SF), a 15-item scale. For each item, participants answer if the type of abuse occurred and how often from, Not in the past 2 months (0) to Daily/ almost daily (5). Total score was calculated by summing all items, which could range from 0 to 75 with higher scores indicate higher frequency and severity of IPV. |
| Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Frequency: Transgender-Specific Intimate Partner Violence (T-IPV) Scale | Post-intervention, 4-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up | IPV frequency is assessed using the trans-specific IPV scale (T-IPV), a 4-item scale that screens for IPV among transgender individuals. Participants reponsded to statements covering the presence of controlling behaviors and psychological abuse tactics (No=0; Yes=1). Scores range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating higher frequency of recent T-IPV. |
| Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Safety: Measure Of Victim Empowerment Related to Safety (MOVERS) | Post-intervention, 4-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up | MOVERS is a 13-item scale designed to assess empowerment related to safety among IPV survivors. Participants rate each item on a five-point Likert scale (1 = Never true to 5 = Always true). For each participant, the mean score across all 13 items was calculated (score range: 1-5). The scale includes 3 subscales: Internal Tools, Expectations of Support, and Trade-Offs. Scores for each subscale were computed as the mean score of the items corresponding to that subscale (score range: 1-5 for all subscales). For both the composite scale and subscales, higher scores indicate greater empowerment. |
| Feasibility of Online STARS as Measured by Recruitment Rates | During recruitment period of study, up to 4 months | One measure of feasibility will be participant recruitment rates. |
| Acceptability of Online STARS as Measured by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire | Post-intervention | One measure of acceptability will be via acceptability ratings using the validated 8-item Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8). Participants rated each item on a four-point Likert scale. For each participant, the mean score across all 8 items was calculated (score range: 1-4), with higher values indicating higher satisfaction. |
| Composite Risk for HIV (CR-HIV) | Post-intervention, 4-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up | Composite Risk for HIV (CR-HIV) calculates a binary indicator (0=No, 1=Yes) of a participant's risk for HIV acquisition using an algorithm based on the following questions: 1. Do they report condomless anal sex with a HIV serodiscordant or status-unknown primary or other partner in the past 6 months? (If yes, move on to question #2; If no, 0) 2. Is the participant using PrEP? (If yes, 0; If no, move onto question #3) 3. Is the participant in a monogamous partnership with an HIV-uninfected partner or an HIV-infected partner who is virally suppressed? (If yes, 0; If no, 1) \*If participants are not certain about their partner's HIV status or viral suppression status in the last question, they are coded as having HIV risk according to this algorithm. The total number of participants at risk for HIV acquisition for each arm is reported. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Total Number of Receptive Condomless Anal Sex Acts With Any HIV Transmission Risk | Post-intervention, 4-months follow-up, 6-months follow-up | The total number of receptive condomless anal sex acts with any HIV transmission risk was calculated by summing the number of receptive anal sex acts in which no prevention method (i.e., condom, PrEP) was used over the last 60 days. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Depressive Symptoms | Post-intervention, 4-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up | Depressive symptoms were evaluated using the Center of Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale-10 (CESD-10). The measure consists of 10 items that asked about feelings or behaviors related to depressive symptoms on a four-point Likert scale (0-3). Items 5 and 8 were first reverse coded, and all points were summed to create a total score ranging from 0 to 30, with higher scores representing greater degrees of depressed mood. |
| PTSD Symptoms: PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) | Post-intervention, 4-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up | PTSD symptoms were evaluated using the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5, a 20-item measure that assesses symptom frequency in the past month on a five-point Likert scale (0 = Not at all to 4 = Extremely). The total score is calculated by summing the responses for all 20 items, resulting in a score between 0 and 80. A higher total score indicates more severe PTSD symptoms. |
| Participants Reporting Instances of IPV | Post-intervention, 4-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up | — |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Program STARS (Supporting Trans Affirmation, Relationships, and Sex) STARS is an HIV prevention intervention for trans women/femmes with recent intimate partner violence (IPV). Delivered by peer counselors, STARS consists of two one-hour sessions held one week apart and two brief 20-30 minute booster sessions held two- and four-weeks after the 2nd hour long session. Requirements for peer counselors include identifying as trans women or trans feminine and having leadership roles in the trans community.
STARS is an empowerment-based intervention that integrates trauma-informed and gender affirmation approaches. The first session emphasizes education and discussion around HIV and IPV, as well as the interaction between IPV and HIV risk. The second session focuses on identifying partners where HIV/IPV risk exists and developing an empowerment plan to address those risks. Participants create an empowerment plan in session 2 and this plan is reviewed and updated in the booster sessions. | 19 |
| Relaxation and Stress Reduction The Relaxation and Stress Reduction Program is structured to mirror STARS (time matched, attention-controlled). Delivered by peer counselors, the Relaxation and Stress Reduction Program consists of two one-hour sessions held one week apart and two brief 20-30 minute booster sessions held two- and four-weeks after the 2nd hour long session. Requirements for peer counselors include identifying as trans women or trans feminine and having leadership roles in the trans community.
The relaxation and stress reduction protocol is an attention and time-matched control condition. The intervention focuses on providing both education and opportunities to practice various relaxation strategies. In addition, education is provided on healthy eating as an additional tool for reducing stress. Booster sessions focus on providing participants with additional practice of relaxation strategies. | 18 |
| Total | 37 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 1 | 2 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Relaxation and Stress Reduction | Program STARS (Supporting Trans Affirmation, Relationships, and Sex) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 35.28 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2 | 32.42 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.88 | 33.81 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.02 |
| Composite Risk for HIV (CR-HIV) | 3 Participants | 1 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Depressive Symptoms | 12.90 Scores on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.79 | 15.53 Scores on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.83 | 14.26 Scores on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.41 |
| Frequency of past-year IPV | 9.67 Events STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.26 | 14.32 Events STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.09 | 12.06 Events STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.81 |
| Intimate Partner Violence Frequency: Transgender-specific IPV scale (T-IPV) Past two months | 0.28 Scores on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.83 | 0.16 Scores on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5 | 0.22 Scores on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.67 |
| Intimate Partner Violence Frequency: Transgender-specific IPV scale (T-IPV) Past year | 0.67 Scores on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.14 | 1.16 Scores on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.74 | 0.92 Scores on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.48 |
| Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Frequency | 3.06 Scores on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.21 | 4.16 Scores on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.73 | 3.63 Scores on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.46 |
| Intimate Partner Violence Safety: Measure Of Victim Empowerment Related to Safety (MOVERS) Composite score | 3.59 Scores on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6 | 3.55 Scores on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.48 | 3.57 Scores on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.54 |
| Intimate Partner Violence Safety: Measure Of Victim Empowerment Related to Safety (MOVERS) Expectations of Support subscale | 3.38 Scores on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.92 | 3.28 Scores on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.75 | 3.33 Scores on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.83 |
| Intimate Partner Violence Safety: Measure Of Victim Empowerment Related to Safety (MOVERS) Internal Tools subscale | 3.53 Scores on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6 | 3.47 Scores on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.68 | 3.50 Scores on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.63 |
| Intimate Partner Violence Safety: Measure Of Victim Empowerment Related to Safety (MOVERS) Trade-Offs subscale | 3.87 Scores on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.67 | 3.91 Scores on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7 | 3.89 Scores on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.68 |
| PTSD symptoms | 33.94 Scores on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.87 | 41.32 Scores on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.29 | 37.73 Scores on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.43 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized American Indian or Alaska Native | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian American and Pacific Islander | 3 Participants | 0 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black/African American | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Hispanic or Latina | 4 Participants | 3 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other | 0 Participants | 3 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White/Caucasian | 16 Participants | 16 Participants | 32 Participants |
| Sex/Gender, Customized Feminine/femme or transfeminine | 6 Participants | 4 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Sex/Gender, Customized Māhū, or muxe, or two spirit | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Sex/Gender, Customized Non-binary | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Sex/Gender, Customized None of these describe me | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Sex/Gender, Customized Woman or Transgender Woman | 11 Participants | 10 Participants | 21 Participants |
| Total number of receptive condomless anal sex acts with any HIV transmission risk | 0.83 Events STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.36 | 0.16 Events STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.69 | 0.49 Events STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.73 |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 19 | 0 / 18 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 1 / 19 | 0 / 18 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 5 / 19 | 0 / 18 |
Outcome results
Acceptability of Online STARS as Measured by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire
One measure of acceptability will be via acceptability ratings using the validated 8-item Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8). Participants rated each item on a four-point Likert scale. For each participant, the mean score across all 8 items was calculated (score range: 1-4), with higher values indicating higher satisfaction.
Time frame: Post-intervention
Population: In the control arm, 1 participant was lost to follow-up after the baseline assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Program STARS (Supporting Trans Affirmation, relationships, and Sex) | Acceptability of Online STARS as Measured by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire | 3.29 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.48 |
| Relaxation and Stress Reduction | Acceptability of Online STARS as Measured by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire | 2.95 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
Composite Risk for HIV (CR-HIV)
Composite Risk for HIV (CR-HIV) calculates a binary indicator (0=No, 1=Yes) of a participant's risk for HIV acquisition using an algorithm based on the following questions: 1. Do they report condomless anal sex with a HIV serodiscordant or status-unknown primary or other partner in the past 6 months? (If yes, move on to question #2; If no, 0) 2. Is the participant using PrEP? (If yes, 0; If no, move onto question #3) 3. Is the participant in a monogamous partnership with an HIV-uninfected partner or an HIV-infected partner who is virally suppressed? (If yes, 0; If no, 1) \*If participants are not certain about their partner's HIV status or viral suppression status in the last question, they are coded as having HIV risk according to this algorithm. The total number of participants at risk for HIV acquisition for each arm is reported.
Time frame: Post-intervention, 4-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up
Population: 3 participants were lost to attrition. In the STARS arm, 1 participant was lost after the post-intervention assessment. In the control arm, 1 participant was lost after the baseline assessment, and 1 participant was lost after the post-intervention assessment.~At 4-month follow-up, 1 participant in the STARS arm and 5 in the control arm missed the assessment window. However, these participants still completed the 6-month follow-up assessment and were included in the analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Program STARS (Supporting Trans Affirmation, relationships, and Sex) | Composite Risk for HIV (CR-HIV) | Post-intervention | 0 Participants |
| Program STARS (Supporting Trans Affirmation, relationships, and Sex) | Composite Risk for HIV (CR-HIV) | 4-month follow-up | 9 Participants |
| Program STARS (Supporting Trans Affirmation, relationships, and Sex) | Composite Risk for HIV (CR-HIV) | 6-month follow-up | 0 Participants |
| Relaxation and Stress Reduction | Composite Risk for HIV (CR-HIV) | Post-intervention | 1 Participants |
| Relaxation and Stress Reduction | Composite Risk for HIV (CR-HIV) | 4-month follow-up | 1 Participants |
| Relaxation and Stress Reduction | Composite Risk for HIV (CR-HIV) | 6-month follow-up | 1 Participants |
Feasibility of Online STARS as Measured by Recruitment Rates
One measure of feasibility will be participant recruitment rates.
Time frame: During recruitment period of study, up to 4 months
Population: Overall Number of Participants Analyzed represents number of participants screened for study interest prior to enrollment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Program STARS (Supporting Trans Affirmation, relationships, and Sex) | Feasibility of Online STARS as Measured by Recruitment Rates | 37 Participants |
Feasibility of Online STARS as Measured by Retention Rates.
One measure of feasibility will be participant retention rates, as measured by engagement/completion of the interventions.
Time frame: Post-intervention, 4-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Program STARS (Supporting Trans Affirmation, relationships, and Sex) | Feasibility of Online STARS as Measured by Retention Rates. | Post-intervention | 19 Participants |
| Program STARS (Supporting Trans Affirmation, relationships, and Sex) | Feasibility of Online STARS as Measured by Retention Rates. | 4-month follow-up | 17 Participants |
| Program STARS (Supporting Trans Affirmation, relationships, and Sex) | Feasibility of Online STARS as Measured by Retention Rates. | 6-month follow-up | 18 Participants |
| Relaxation and Stress Reduction | Feasibility of Online STARS as Measured by Retention Rates. | Post-intervention | 17 Participants |
| Relaxation and Stress Reduction | Feasibility of Online STARS as Measured by Retention Rates. | 4-month follow-up | 11 Participants |
| Relaxation and Stress Reduction | Feasibility of Online STARS as Measured by Retention Rates. | 6-month follow-up | 16 Participants |
Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Frequency: Composite Abuse Scale Revised Short Form (CASr-SF)
Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Frequency was measured using the Composite Abuse Scale Revised-Short Form (CASr-SF), a 15-item scale. For each item, participants answer if the type of abuse occurred and how often from, Not in the past 2 months (0) to Daily/ almost daily (5). Total score was calculated by summing all items, which could range from 0 to 75 with higher scores indicate higher frequency and severity of IPV.
Time frame: Post-intervention, 4-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up
Population: 3 participants were lost to attrition. In the STARS arm, 1 participant was lost after the post-intervention assessment. In the control arm, 1 participant was lost after the baseline assessment, and 1 participant was lost after the post-intervention assessment.~At 4-month follow-up, 1 participant in the STARS arm and 5 in the control arm missed the assessment window. However, these participants still completed the 6-month follow-up assessment and were included in the analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program STARS (Supporting Trans Affirmation, relationships, and Sex) | Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Frequency: Composite Abuse Scale Revised Short Form (CASr-SF) | Post-intervention | 2.37 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.27 |
| Program STARS (Supporting Trans Affirmation, relationships, and Sex) | Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Frequency: Composite Abuse Scale Revised Short Form (CASr-SF) | 4-month follow-up | 1.06 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.93 |
| Program STARS (Supporting Trans Affirmation, relationships, and Sex) | Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Frequency: Composite Abuse Scale Revised Short Form (CASr-SF) | 6-month follow-up | 0.22 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.65 |
| Relaxation and Stress Reduction | Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Frequency: Composite Abuse Scale Revised Short Form (CASr-SF) | Post-intervention | 1.18 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.38 |
| Relaxation and Stress Reduction | Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Frequency: Composite Abuse Scale Revised Short Form (CASr-SF) | 4-month follow-up | 0.82 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.09 |
| Relaxation and Stress Reduction | Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Frequency: Composite Abuse Scale Revised Short Form (CASr-SF) | 6-month follow-up | 0.63 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.62 |
Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Frequency: Transgender-Specific Intimate Partner Violence (T-IPV) Scale
IPV frequency is assessed using the trans-specific IPV scale (T-IPV), a 4-item scale that screens for IPV among transgender individuals. Participants reponsded to statements covering the presence of controlling behaviors and psychological abuse tactics (No=0; Yes=1). Scores range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating higher frequency of recent T-IPV.
Time frame: Post-intervention, 4-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up
Population: 3 participants were lost to attrition. In the STARS arm, 1 participant was lost after the post-intervention assessment. In the control arm, 1 participant was lost after the baseline assessment, and 1 participant was lost after the post-intervention assessment.~At 4-month follow-up, 1 participant in the STARS arm and 5 in the control arm missed the assessment window. However, these participants still completed the 6-month follow-up assessment and were included in the analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program STARS (Supporting Trans Affirmation, relationships, and Sex) | Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Frequency: Transgender-Specific Intimate Partner Violence (T-IPV) Scale | Post-intervention | 0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Program STARS (Supporting Trans Affirmation, relationships, and Sex) | Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Frequency: Transgender-Specific Intimate Partner Violence (T-IPV) Scale | 4-month follow-up | 0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Program STARS (Supporting Trans Affirmation, relationships, and Sex) | Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Frequency: Transgender-Specific Intimate Partner Violence (T-IPV) Scale | 6-month follow-up | 0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Relaxation and Stress Reduction | Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Frequency: Transgender-Specific Intimate Partner Violence (T-IPV) Scale | Post-intervention | 0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Relaxation and Stress Reduction | Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Frequency: Transgender-Specific Intimate Partner Violence (T-IPV) Scale | 4-month follow-up | 0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Relaxation and Stress Reduction | Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Frequency: Transgender-Specific Intimate Partner Violence (T-IPV) Scale | 6-month follow-up | 0.06 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.25 |
Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Safety: Measure Of Victim Empowerment Related to Safety (MOVERS)
MOVERS is a 13-item scale designed to assess empowerment related to safety among IPV survivors. Participants rate each item on a five-point Likert scale (1 = Never true to 5 = Always true). For each participant, the mean score across all 13 items was calculated (score range: 1-5). The scale includes 3 subscales: Internal Tools, Expectations of Support, and Trade-Offs. Scores for each subscale were computed as the mean score of the items corresponding to that subscale (score range: 1-5 for all subscales). For both the composite scale and subscales, higher scores indicate greater empowerment.
Time frame: Post-intervention, 4-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up
Population: 3 participants were lost to attrition. In the STARS arm, 1 participant was lost after the post-intervention assessment. In the control arm, 1 participant was lost after the baseline assessment, and 1 participant was lost after the post-intervention assessment.~At 4-month follow-up, 1 participant in the STARS arm and 5 in the control arm missed the assessment window. However, these participants still completed the 6-month follow-up assessment and were included in the analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program STARS (Supporting Trans Affirmation, relationships, and Sex) | Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Safety: Measure Of Victim Empowerment Related to Safety (MOVERS) | Post-intervention (Composite) | 3.65 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 0.63 |
| Program STARS (Supporting Trans Affirmation, relationships, and Sex) | Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Safety: Measure Of Victim Empowerment Related to Safety (MOVERS) | 4-month follow-up (Composite) | 3.82 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 0.51 |
| Program STARS (Supporting Trans Affirmation, relationships, and Sex) | Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Safety: Measure Of Victim Empowerment Related to Safety (MOVERS) | 6-month follow-up (Composite) | 3.77 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 0.57 |
| Program STARS (Supporting Trans Affirmation, relationships, and Sex) | Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Safety: Measure Of Victim Empowerment Related to Safety (MOVERS) | Post-intervention (Internal Tools subscale) | 3.69 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 0.74 |
| Program STARS (Supporting Trans Affirmation, relationships, and Sex) | Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Safety: Measure Of Victim Empowerment Related to Safety (MOVERS) | 4-month follow-up (Internal Tools subscale) | 3.94 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 0.69 |
| Program STARS (Supporting Trans Affirmation, relationships, and Sex) | Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Safety: Measure Of Victim Empowerment Related to Safety (MOVERS) | 6-month follow-up (Internal Tools subscale) | 3.95 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 0.52 |
| Program STARS (Supporting Trans Affirmation, relationships, and Sex) | Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Safety: Measure Of Victim Empowerment Related to Safety (MOVERS) | Post-intervention (Expectations of Support subscale) | 3.45 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 1.03 |
| Program STARS (Supporting Trans Affirmation, relationships, and Sex) | Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Safety: Measure Of Victim Empowerment Related to Safety (MOVERS) | 4-month follow-up (Expectations of Support subscale) | 3.63 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 0.82 |
| Program STARS (Supporting Trans Affirmation, relationships, and Sex) | Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Safety: Measure Of Victim Empowerment Related to Safety (MOVERS) | 6-month follow-up (Expectations of Support subscale) | 3.51 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 0.95 |
| Program STARS (Supporting Trans Affirmation, relationships, and Sex) | Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Safety: Measure Of Victim Empowerment Related to Safety (MOVERS) | Post-intervention (Trade-Offs subscale) | 3.81 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 0.75 |
| Program STARS (Supporting Trans Affirmation, relationships, and Sex) | Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Safety: Measure Of Victim Empowerment Related to Safety (MOVERS) | 4-month follow-up (Trade-Offs subscale) | 3.88 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 0.95 |
| Program STARS (Supporting Trans Affirmation, relationships, and Sex) | Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Safety: Measure Of Victim Empowerment Related to Safety (MOVERS) | 6-month follow-up (Trade-Offs subscale) | 3.85 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 0.91 |
| Relaxation and Stress Reduction | Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Safety: Measure Of Victim Empowerment Related to Safety (MOVERS) | 4-month follow-up (Trade-Offs subscale) | 3.52 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
| Relaxation and Stress Reduction | Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Safety: Measure Of Victim Empowerment Related to Safety (MOVERS) | Post-intervention (Composite) | 3.46 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 0.74 |
| Relaxation and Stress Reduction | Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Safety: Measure Of Victim Empowerment Related to Safety (MOVERS) | Post-intervention (Expectations of Support subscale) | 3.35 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 1.03 |
| Relaxation and Stress Reduction | Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Safety: Measure Of Victim Empowerment Related to Safety (MOVERS) | 4-month follow-up (Composite) | 3.61 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 0.51 |
| Relaxation and Stress Reduction | Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Safety: Measure Of Victim Empowerment Related to Safety (MOVERS) | Post-intervention (Trade-Offs subscale) | 3.61 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 0.76 |
| Relaxation and Stress Reduction | Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Safety: Measure Of Victim Empowerment Related to Safety (MOVERS) | 6-month follow-up (Composite) | 3.73 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 0.49 |
| Relaxation and Stress Reduction | Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Safety: Measure Of Victim Empowerment Related to Safety (MOVERS) | 4-month follow-up (Expectations of Support subscale) | 3.57 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 0.66 |
| Relaxation and Stress Reduction | Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Safety: Measure Of Victim Empowerment Related to Safety (MOVERS) | Post-intervention (Internal Tools subscale) | 3.43 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 0.85 |
| Relaxation and Stress Reduction | Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Safety: Measure Of Victim Empowerment Related to Safety (MOVERS) | 6-month follow-up (Trade-Offs subscale) | 3.88 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 0.75 |
| Relaxation and Stress Reduction | Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Safety: Measure Of Victim Empowerment Related to Safety (MOVERS) | 4-month follow-up (Internal Tools subscale) | 3.76 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Relaxation and Stress Reduction | Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Safety: Measure Of Victim Empowerment Related to Safety (MOVERS) | 6-month follow-up (Expectations of Support subscale) | 3.66 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 0.83 |
| Relaxation and Stress Reduction | Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Safety: Measure Of Victim Empowerment Related to Safety (MOVERS) | 6-month follow-up (Internal Tools subscale) | 3.65 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 0.75 |
Total Number of Receptive Condomless Anal Sex Acts With Any HIV Transmission Risk
The total number of receptive condomless anal sex acts with any HIV transmission risk was calculated by summing the number of receptive anal sex acts in which no prevention method (i.e., condom, PrEP) was used over the last 60 days.
Time frame: Post-intervention, 4-months follow-up, 6-months follow-up
Population: 3 participants were lost to attrition. In the STARS arm, 1 participant was lost after the post-intervention assessment. In the control arm, 1 participant was lost after the baseline assessment, and 1 participant was lost after the post-intervention assessment.~At 4-month follow-up, 1 participant in the STARS arm and 5 in the control arm missed the assessment window. However, these participants still completed the 6-month follow-up assessment and were included in the analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program STARS (Supporting Trans Affirmation, relationships, and Sex) | Total Number of Receptive Condomless Anal Sex Acts With Any HIV Transmission Risk | Post-intervention | 0 Events | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Program STARS (Supporting Trans Affirmation, relationships, and Sex) | Total Number of Receptive Condomless Anal Sex Acts With Any HIV Transmission Risk | 4-month follow-up | 0 Events | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Program STARS (Supporting Trans Affirmation, relationships, and Sex) | Total Number of Receptive Condomless Anal Sex Acts With Any HIV Transmission Risk | 6-month follow-up | 0 Events | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Relaxation and Stress Reduction | Total Number of Receptive Condomless Anal Sex Acts With Any HIV Transmission Risk | Post-intervention | 0.5 Events | Standard Deviation 0.24 |
| Relaxation and Stress Reduction | Total Number of Receptive Condomless Anal Sex Acts With Any HIV Transmission Risk | 4-month follow-up | 1.45 Events | Standard Deviation 4.82 |
| Relaxation and Stress Reduction | Total Number of Receptive Condomless Anal Sex Acts With Any HIV Transmission Risk | 6-month follow-up | .25 Events | Standard Deviation 1 |
Depressive Symptoms
Depressive symptoms were evaluated using the Center of Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale-10 (CESD-10). The measure consists of 10 items that asked about feelings or behaviors related to depressive symptoms on a four-point Likert scale (0-3). Items 5 and 8 were first reverse coded, and all points were summed to create a total score ranging from 0 to 30, with higher scores representing greater degrees of depressed mood.
Time frame: Post-intervention, 4-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up
Population: 3 participants were lost to attrition. In the STARS arm, 1 participant was lost after the post-intervention assessment. In the control arm, 1 participant was lost after the baseline assessment, and 1 participant was lost after the post-intervention assessment.~At 4-month follow-up, 1 participant in the STARS arm and 5 in the control arm missed the assessment window. However, these participants still completed the 6-month follow-up assessment and were included in the analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program STARS (Supporting Trans Affirmation, relationships, and Sex) | Depressive Symptoms | Post-intervention | 13.63 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.32 |
| Program STARS (Supporting Trans Affirmation, relationships, and Sex) | Depressive Symptoms | 4-month follow-up | 12.29 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.6 |
| Program STARS (Supporting Trans Affirmation, relationships, and Sex) | Depressive Symptoms | 6-month follow-up | 13.11 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.88 |
| Relaxation and Stress Reduction | Depressive Symptoms | Post-intervention | 12.47 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.54 |
| Relaxation and Stress Reduction | Depressive Symptoms | 4-month follow-up | 13.27 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.17 |
| Relaxation and Stress Reduction | Depressive Symptoms | 6-month follow-up | 13.19 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.58 |
Participants Reporting Instances of IPV
Time frame: Post-intervention, 4-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up
Population: 3 participants were lost to attrition. In the STARS arm, 1 participant was lost after the post-intervention assessment. In the control arm, 1 participant was lost after the baseline assessment, and 1 participant was lost after the post-intervention assessment.~At 4-month follow-up, 1 participant in the STARS arm and 5 in the control arm missed the assessment window. However, these participants still completed the 6-month follow-up assessment and were included in the analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Program STARS (Supporting Trans Affirmation, relationships, and Sex) | Participants Reporting Instances of IPV | Post-intervention | 7 Participants |
| Program STARS (Supporting Trans Affirmation, relationships, and Sex) | Participants Reporting Instances of IPV | 4-month follow-up | 5 Participants |
| Program STARS (Supporting Trans Affirmation, relationships, and Sex) | Participants Reporting Instances of IPV | 6-month follow-up | 2 Participants |
| Relaxation and Stress Reduction | Participants Reporting Instances of IPV | Post-intervention | 5 Participants |
| Relaxation and Stress Reduction | Participants Reporting Instances of IPV | 4-month follow-up | 3 Participants |
| Relaxation and Stress Reduction | Participants Reporting Instances of IPV | 6-month follow-up | 3 Participants |
PTSD Symptoms: PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5)
PTSD symptoms were evaluated using the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5, a 20-item measure that assesses symptom frequency in the past month on a five-point Likert scale (0 = Not at all to 4 = Extremely). The total score is calculated by summing the responses for all 20 items, resulting in a score between 0 and 80. A higher total score indicates more severe PTSD symptoms.
Time frame: Post-intervention, 4-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up
Population: 3 participants were lost to attrition. In the STARS arm, 1 participant was lost after the post-intervention assessment. In the control arm, 1 participant was lost after the baseline assessment, and 1 participant was lost after the post-intervention assessment.~At 4-month follow-up, 1 participant in the STARS arm and 5 in the control arm missed the assessment window. However, these participants still completed the 6-month follow-up assessment and were included in the analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program STARS (Supporting Trans Affirmation, relationships, and Sex) | PTSD Symptoms: PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) | Post-intervention | 32.68 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.13 |
| Program STARS (Supporting Trans Affirmation, relationships, and Sex) | PTSD Symptoms: PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) | 4-month follow-up | 30.76 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.04 |
| Program STARS (Supporting Trans Affirmation, relationships, and Sex) | PTSD Symptoms: PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) | 6-month follow-up | 26.83 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.86 |
| Relaxation and Stress Reduction | PTSD Symptoms: PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) | Post-intervention | 26.59 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.74 |
| Relaxation and Stress Reduction | PTSD Symptoms: PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) | 4-month follow-up | 27.91 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.91 |
| Relaxation and Stress Reduction | PTSD Symptoms: PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) | 6-month follow-up | 31.31 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.57 |