Skip to content

A Study of Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of KAN-101 in People With Celiac Disease

A Phase 2a Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of KAN-101 In Participants With Celiac Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06001177
Acronym
SynCeD
Enrollment
55
Registered
2023-08-21
Start date
2023-12-13
Completion date
2025-01-13
Last updated
2025-12-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Celiac Disease, Coeliac Disease

Keywords

celiac disease, HLA-DQ2.5, gluten free diet

Brief summary

The study goal is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of KAN-101 in participants with Celiac Disease (CeD)

Detailed description

Study KAN-101-03 is a multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 2a study to examine whether KAN-101 confers protection from gluten exposure induced histological changes in the duodenum and to further evaluate the safety/tolerability of KAN-101 in adult participants (≥18 years) with CeD on a gluten free diet. Approximately 52 participants who meet study inclusion/exclusion criteria will be randomized 1:1 to receive KAN-101 or placebo.

Interventions

Dose KAN-101 Intravenous (IV) Infusion

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo Intravenous (IV) Infusion

Sponsors

Pfizer
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Kanyos Bio, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Anokion SA
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Study participants and their caregivers, investigators and other staff, and sponsor staff involved in the study team will be blinded.

Intervention model description

The study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with approximately 52 participants that will receive KAN-101 or placebo

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Previous diagnosis of celiac disease based on histology and positive celiac serology * HLA-DQ2.5 genotype * Gluten-free diet for at least 12 months * Negative or weak positive for transglutaminase IgA and negative or weak positive for DGP-IgA/IgG during screening * Screening intestinal biopsy demonstrating Vh:Cd ratio of 2.3 or higher

Exclusion criteria

* Refractory celiac disease * HLA-DQ8 genotype * Selective IgA deficiency * Diagnosis of type-I diabetes * Other Active gastrointestinal diseases * History of dermatitis herpetiformis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes From Baseline in Villous Height to Crypt Depth (Vh:Cd) as Assessed by Esophagogastroduodenoscopy With Biopsy After 2-week Gluten Challenge (GC)Baseline and Day 29KAN-101 attenuated GC-induced changes in duodenal histology as measured by the Vh:Cd ratio.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes From Baseline in Intraepithelial Lymphocyte (IEL) Density in Duodenum Biopsy After 2-week GCBaseline and Day 29
Incidence and Severity of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) as Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)From the time the participant provided informed consent through Day 42.An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. AEs included both serious and all non-serious adverse events. SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life-threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect; or that was considered as an important medical event. According to NCI CTCAE version 5: Grade 1= mild AE; Grade 2= moderate AE; Grade 3=severe AE; Grade 4= life-threatening consequences and urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5= death related to AE. An AE was considered treatment-emergent relative to a given treatment if the event start date is during the on-treatment period (including on the date of first dose).
Incidence by Visit of KAN-101 Antidrug Antibody (ADA)Up to 42 days
KAN-101 Plasma Concentration: AUCinf0 minutes, 30 minutes, 2 hours 30 minutes, 4 hours post dose on day 1 and day 7Area under the plasma-concentration time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinite time.
Change in Magnitude of Interleukin-2 (IL-2) Response From Day 15 (First Day of GC) Pre-GC to Day 15 Post GCFrom Day 15 pre-GC to Day 15 post GC
KAN-101 Plasma Concentration: Cmax0 minutes, 30 minutes, 2 hours 30 minutes, 4 hours post dose on day 1 and day 7Maximum plasma concentration.
KAN-101 Plasma Concentration: Tmax0 minutes, 30 minutes, 2 hours 30 minutes, 4 hours post dose on day 1 and day 7Time to reach Cmax.
KAN-101 Plasma Concentration: T1/20 minutes, 30 minutes, 2 hours 30 minutes, 4 hours post dose on day 1 and day 7Terminal phase half-life.
KAN-101 Plasma Concentration: AUClast0 minutes, 30 minutes, 2 hours 30 minutes, 4 hours post dose on day 1 and day 7Area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (Clast).

Countries

Canada, Finland, Germany, Ireland, Israel, Netherlands, Poland, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 55 participants were enrolled and treated, of which 50 participants completed the study, 2 participants discontinued from the treatment phase, and 3 participants discontinued from the observation phase.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
0.6 mg/kg KAN-101
All enrolled participants received 0.6 mg/kg of KAN-101 via intravenous (IV) infusions every 3 days starting on Day 1 and ending on Day 7 KAN-101: 0.6 mg/kg KAN-101 Intravenous (IV) Infusion
28
Placebo
All enrolled participants received intravenous (IV) infusions of placebo every 3 days starting on Day 1 and ending on Day 7 Placebo: Placebo Intravenous (IV) Infusion
27
Total55

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Observation PhaseAdverse Event11
Observation PhaseWithdrawal by Subject01
Treatment PhaseAdverse Event10
Treatment PhaseWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboTotal0.6 mg/kg KAN-101
Age, Continuous39.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.96
39.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.42
38.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.1
Body Mass Index26.07 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.191
25.68 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.207
25.30 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.29
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants3 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
24 Participants52 Participants28 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Height165.64 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.635
166.72 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.834
167.76 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.055
Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) Genotype
Negative
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) Genotype
Positive
27 participants54 participants27 participants
Positive Celiac Serology at Diagnosis
DEAMIDATED GLIADIN PEPTIDE IGA (DGP-IGA)
0 participants3 participants3 participants
Positive Celiac Serology at Diagnosis
DEAMIDATED GLIADIN PEPTIDE IGG (DGP-IGG)
1 participants5 participants4 participants
Positive Celiac Serology at Diagnosis
TISSUE TRANSGLUTAMINASE IGA ANTIBODY (TTG-IGA)
25 participants51 participants26 participants
Positive Celiac Serology at Diagnosis
TISSUE TRANSGLUTAMINASE IGG ANTIBODY (TTG-IGG)
1 participants6 participants5 participants
Positive Histology at Diagnosis
EVIDENCE OF VILLOUS ATROPHY (NO MARSH SCORE REPORTED)
16 participants34 participants18 participants
Positive Histology at Diagnosis
MARSH SCORE 2
3 participants3 participants0 participants
Positive Histology at Diagnosis
MARSH SCORE 3A
1 participants5 participants4 participants
Positive Histology at Diagnosis
MARSH SCORE 3B
5 participants8 participants3 participants
Positive Histology at Diagnosis
MARSH SCORE 3C
2 participants5 participants3 participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
27 Participants55 Participants28 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
25 Participants46 Participants21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants9 Participants7 Participants
Time on Gluten-Free Diet (GFD)7.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.66
7.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.45
7.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.34
Time since First CeD Diagnosis9.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.57
8.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.48
7.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.36
Weight71.23 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.386
71.26 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.738
71.30 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.183

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 280 / 27
other
Total, other adverse events
24 / 2820 / 27
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 280 / 27

Outcome results

Primary

Changes From Baseline in Villous Height to Crypt Depth (Vh:Cd) as Assessed by Esophagogastroduodenoscopy With Biopsy After 2-week Gluten Challenge (GC)

KAN-101 attenuated GC-induced changes in duodenal histology as measured by the Vh:Cd ratio.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 29

Population: Full Analysis Set - All participants who were randomly assigned to the study intervention, received all 3 doses of the study intervention, and completed at least 7 days of the 2-week GC without prohibited medications. Participants were analyzed according to the study intervention they were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
0.6 mg/kg KAN-101Changes From Baseline in Villous Height to Crypt Depth (Vh:Cd) as Assessed by Esophagogastroduodenoscopy With Biopsy After 2-week Gluten Challenge (GC)-0.85 ratioStandard Deviation 0.707
PlaceboChanges From Baseline in Villous Height to Crypt Depth (Vh:Cd) as Assessed by Esophagogastroduodenoscopy With Biopsy After 2-week Gluten Challenge (GC)-0.61 ratioStandard Deviation 0.614
p-value: 0.166895% CI: [-0.63, 0.11]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Magnitude of Interleukin-2 (IL-2) Response From Day 15 (First Day of GC) Pre-GC to Day 15 Post GC

Time frame: From Day 15 pre-GC to Day 15 post GC

Population: Biomarker Analysis Set - All participants who were randomly assigned to the study intervention, received any portion of the study intervention, and had completed the GC on Day 15 without prohibited medications. Participants were analyzed according to the study intervention they were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
0.6 mg/kg KAN-101Change in Magnitude of Interleukin-2 (IL-2) Response From Day 15 (First Day of GC) Pre-GC to Day 15 Post GC31.8 international unitStandard Deviation 95.86
PlaceboChange in Magnitude of Interleukin-2 (IL-2) Response From Day 15 (First Day of GC) Pre-GC to Day 15 Post GC31.1 international unitStandard Deviation 102.3
Secondary

Changes From Baseline in Intraepithelial Lymphocyte (IEL) Density in Duodenum Biopsy After 2-week GC

Time frame: Baseline and Day 29

Population: Full Analysis Set - All participants who were randomly assigned to the study intervention, received all 3 doses of the study intervention, and completed at least 7 days of the 2-week GC without prohibited medications. Participants were analyzed according to the study intervention they were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
0.6 mg/kg KAN-101Changes From Baseline in Intraepithelial Lymphocyte (IEL) Density in Duodenum Biopsy After 2-week GC20.68 cells per 100 epithelial cellsStandard Deviation 17.447
PlaceboChanges From Baseline in Intraepithelial Lymphocyte (IEL) Density in Duodenum Biopsy After 2-week GC17.36 cells per 100 epithelial cellsStandard Deviation 16.286
Secondary

Incidence and Severity of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) as Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. AEs included both serious and all non-serious adverse events. SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life-threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect; or that was considered as an important medical event. According to NCI CTCAE version 5: Grade 1= mild AE; Grade 2= moderate AE; Grade 3=severe AE; Grade 4= life-threatening consequences and urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5= death related to AE. An AE was considered treatment-emergent relative to a given treatment if the event start date is during the on-treatment period (including on the date of first dose).

Time frame: From the time the participant provided informed consent through Day 42.

Population: Safety Analysis Set - All participants who received any portion of the study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the study intervention they actually received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
0.6 mg/kg KAN-101Incidence and Severity of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) as Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)Grade 2 TEAE0 Participants
0.6 mg/kg KAN-101Incidence and Severity of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) as Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)TEAE25 Participants
0.6 mg/kg KAN-101Incidence and Severity of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) as Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)Grade 3 or higher TEAE1 Participants
0.6 mg/kg KAN-101Incidence and Severity of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) as Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)SAE1 Participants
PlaceboIncidence and Severity of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) as Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)Grade 3 or higher TEAE0 Participants
PlaceboIncidence and Severity of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) as Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)TEAE22 Participants
PlaceboIncidence and Severity of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) as Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)Grade 2 TEAE1 Participants
PlaceboIncidence and Severity of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) as Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)SAE0 Participants
Secondary

Incidence by Visit of KAN-101 Antidrug Antibody (ADA)

Time frame: Up to 42 days

Population: Safety analysis set - all participants who received any portion of study intervention. Participants with at least 1 positive response post-treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
0.6 mg/kg KAN-101Incidence by Visit of KAN-101 Antidrug Antibody (ADA)Baseline0 participants
0.6 mg/kg KAN-101Incidence by Visit of KAN-101 Antidrug Antibody (ADA)Day 70 participants
0.6 mg/kg KAN-101Incidence by Visit of KAN-101 Antidrug Antibody (ADA)Day 293 participants
0.6 mg/kg KAN-101Incidence by Visit of KAN-101 Antidrug Antibody (ADA)Day 425 participants
Secondary

KAN-101 Plasma Concentration: AUCinf

Area under the plasma-concentration time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinite time.

Time frame: 0 minutes, 30 minutes, 2 hours 30 minutes, 4 hours post dose on day 1 and day 7

Population: AUC could not be determined due to limited data points. Samples at the terminal elimination phase were below limit of quantification.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
0.6 mg/kg KAN-101KAN-101 Plasma Concentration: AUCinfNA hr/mL
Secondary

KAN-101 Plasma Concentration: AUClast

Area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (Clast).

Time frame: 0 minutes, 30 minutes, 2 hours 30 minutes, 4 hours post dose on day 1 and day 7

Population: AUC could not be determined due to limited data points. Samples at the terminal elimination phase were below limit of quantification.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
0.6 mg/kg KAN-101KAN-101 Plasma Concentration: AUClastNA hr/mL
Secondary

KAN-101 Plasma Concentration: Cmax

Maximum plasma concentration.

Time frame: 0 minutes, 30 minutes, 2 hours 30 minutes, 4 hours post dose on day 1 and day 7

Population: PK Analysis Set - All participants who receive any portion of study intervention and have at least one post-dose concentration value.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
0.6 mg/kg KAN-101KAN-101 Plasma Concentration: CmaxDay 13141.9 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 39
0.6 mg/kg KAN-101KAN-101 Plasma Concentration: CmaxDay 74107.9 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 66.7
Secondary

KAN-101 Plasma Concentration: T1/2

Terminal phase half-life.

Time frame: 0 minutes, 30 minutes, 2 hours 30 minutes, 4 hours post dose on day 1 and day 7

Population: T1/2 could not be determined due to limited data points. Samples at the terminal elimination phase were below limit of quantification.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
0.6 mg/kg KAN-101KAN-101 Plasma Concentration: T1/2NA hour
Secondary

KAN-101 Plasma Concentration: Tmax

Time to reach Cmax.

Time frame: 0 minutes, 30 minutes, 2 hours 30 minutes, 4 hours post dose on day 1 and day 7

Population: PK Analysis Set - All participants who receive any portion of study intervention and have at least one post-dose concentration value.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
0.6 mg/kg KAN-101KAN-101 Plasma Concentration: TmaxDay 10.7 hStandard Deviation 0.48
0.6 mg/kg KAN-101KAN-101 Plasma Concentration: TmaxDay 70.6 hStandard Deviation 0.13

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026