Skip to content

Safety, Feasibility, and Efficacy of TSCS on Stabilizing Blood Pressure for Acute Inpatients With SCI

Safety, Feasibility, and Efficacy of Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation on Stabilizing Blood Pressure for Acute Inpatients With Spinal Cord Injury

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06000592
Enrollment
50
Registered
2023-08-21
Start date
2022-01-01
Completion date
2026-10-01
Last updated
2024-04-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Spinal Cord Injury, Blood Pressure, Blood Pressure Disorders, Neuromodulation, SCI - Spinal Cord Injury, Spinal Cord Injuries, Spinal Cord Stimulation, Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury

Brief summary

Current forms of pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic treatments for hypotension and orthostatic hypotension (OH) remain inadequate during acute inpatient rehabilitation (AIR) following a traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). A critical need exists for the identification of safe, practical, and effective treatment options that stabilize blood pressure (BP) after traumatic SCI. Recent published evidence suggests that transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation (TSCS) can be used to raise seated BP, and mitigate the falls in BP during orthostatic repositioning in individuals with chronic SCI. This site-specific project will focus on the use of TSCS to stabilizing seated BP and mitigate the fall in BP during orthostatic repositioning during AIR following traumatic SCI.

Detailed description

Based on available evidence, TSCS may have advantages over current pharmacological approaches to the treatment of hypotension and OH: (1) does not exacerbate polypharmacy, (2) can be activated/deactivated rapidly, and (3) can be applied in synergy with physical exercise. TSCS represents an alternate approach to epidural SCS, with far greater potential to reach large numbers of individuals, thus providing for a greater likelihood of clinical implementation with fewer risk. We are asking several key questions: (1) what are the effects of TSCS on seated BP and BP changes during an orthostatic challenge, (2) is the application of TSCS during AIR tolerable based on pain reporting, (3) is there evidence of superficial burns to the skin near the site of cathode or anode placement, and (4) are the symptoms of orthostatic intolerance reduced with TSCS? To facilitate adoption of TSCS for widespread clinical use, we have designed a spatial-temporal mapping and parameter configuration approach that will result in a key deliverable for SCI care: a standard, easy to follow algorithm that will maximize individual benefits of spinal neuromodulation, while minimizing the burden on healthcare professionals. This project will provide the foundational evidence to support the feasible and safe application of TSCS for widespread clinical utility in the newly injured SCI population, thereby overcoming barriers to engagement in prescribed AIR regimens that are imposed by autonomic nervous system dysfunction.

Interventions

DEVICEDigitimer

transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation for blood pressure control following spinal cord injury.

Sponsors

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
CollaboratorOTHER
Jill M. Wecht, Ed.D.
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Participant awareness during TSCS appears to be unavoidable. The FDA recognizes that some trials of non-pharmacological interventions cannot be fully shammed or blinded, yet with careful blinding of data assessors, it is possible to obtain reliable results that meet FDA approval criteria.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
14 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Newly injured patients with traumatic SCI * Admitted to Acute Inpatient Rehabilitation at Mount Sinai * Within one year of SCI * Seated hypotension (systolic BP ≤ 110 mmHg for males or ≤ 100 mmHg for females) * Orthostatic hypotension (fall in systolic BP ≥ 20 mmHg and/or a fall in diastolic BP ≥ 10 mmHg within 10 minutes of assuming an upright position) * Daily fluctuation in systolic BP ≥ 20 mmHg and/or fluctuation in diastolic BP ≥ 10 mmHg * At least 14 years old

Exclusion criteria

* Implanted brain/spine/nerve stimulators * Cochlear implants * Cardiac pacemaker/defibrillator, or intracardiac lines * Open skin lesions on or near the electrode placement sites (neck, upper back) * Significant coronary artery or cardiac conduction disease * Recent history of myocardial infarction * Insufficient mental capacity to understand and independently provide consent * Pregnancy * Cancer * Deemed unsuitable by study physician

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The efficacy (#1) of TSCS to improve autonomic control following acute SCI.Acute Inpatient Rehabilitation following SCI (up to 4 months)Blood pressure changes (mmHg) during the sit-up test with TSCS compared to no stimulation.
The safety (#1) of TSCS to improve autonomic control following acute SCI.Acute Inpatient Rehabilitation following SCI (up to 4 months)Assess pain levels using a Likert Scale 0-10 (0=no pain, 10=worst pain).
The safety (#2) of TSCS to improve autonomic control following acute SCI.Acute Inpatient Rehabilitation following SCI (up to 4 months)Document any skin changes (burns) following use of TSCS in count of occurrences.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The efficacy (#2) of TSCS to improve autonomic control following acute SCI.Acute Inpatient Rehabilitation following SCI (up to 4 months)To compare dizziness symptoms on a Likert Scale 0-10 (0=no dizziness, 10=worst dizziness) during the sit-up test with TSCS compared to no stimulation..

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactJorge Chavez, BS
jorge.chavez2@mountsinai.org(914)343-0713
Backup ContactJill M Wecht, EdD
jm.wecht@va.gov(718)584-9000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026