Skip to content

Retention, Chewing Efficiency and Masticatory Performance of Partial Dentures Opposing Implant Retained Prosthesis.

Retention, Chewing Efficiency and Masticatory Performance of Maxillary Flexible Versus Computer Aided Design/Computer Aided Manufacture(CAD/CAM) Partial Dentures Opposing Fixed Implant Retained Prosthesis.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05999760
Enrollment
22
Registered
2023-08-21
Start date
2022-11-15
Completion date
2023-01-20
Last updated
2023-08-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Implant Complication, Implant Site Reaction

Keywords

Retention, Chewing efficiency, Removable Prosthodontics

Brief summary

This study aims to evaluate retention ,chewing efficiency and masticatory performance of flexible versus CAD/CAM partial dentures opposing to fixed implant retained restorations.

Detailed description

in this study 22 patients will be selected following inclusion and exclusion criteria. The patients will be divided randomly into two groups. Group I patients will receive Versacrylic removable partial denture. group II patients will receive CAD/CAM removable partial denture all patients will be given the home care instructions at night and brush cleaning of the dentures. Measurements of retention using universal testing machine, masticatory performance using T-scan III computerized system and chewing efficiency using chewing function questionnaire

Interventions

DEVICEevaluation of retention of Versacryle and CAD/CAM partial dentures by force gauge

Evaluation of retention of Versacryle and CAD/CAM partial dentures by force gauge on day one, on first month, and on the second month of prosthesis delivery.

DEVICEchewing efficiency by electromyograph(E.M.G)

Evaluation of chewing efficiency of Versacryle and CAD/CAM partial dentures by force gauge on day one, on first month, and on the second month of prosthesis delivery.

OTHERmasticatory performance(questionnaire)

Evaluation of masticatory performance of Versacryle and CAD/CAM partial dentures by questionnaire on day one, on first month, and on the second month of prosthesis delivery.

Sponsors

National Research Centre, Egypt
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

each patient was not informed about material of received prosthesis

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
40 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Non-smoker male Patients * Age ranging from 40-50 years. * Highly cooperative and motivated patients. * Patients Systemically free from any immunosuppressive diseases. * Patients free from Diabetes, Hypertension, Cancer, any mental or physical diseases. * Patients not receiving any Radiotherapy or chemotherapy treatment.

Exclusion criteria

* Female patients * Smoker patients. * Age exceeding 50 years * Uncooperative and unmotivated patients.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
evaluation of change of retention of versacrylic and CAD/CAM partial dentureon day 1 ,1 month and 2months of prosthesis deliverymeasurement of retention of partial dentures made of Versacryle and CAD/CAM technology
evaluation of change of chewing efficiency of versacrylic and CAD/CAM partial dentureon day 1 ,1 month and 2months of prosthesis deliverymeasurement of chewing efficiency of partial dentures made of Versacryle and CAD/CAM technology
evaluation of change of masticatory performance of versacrylic and CAD/CAM partial dentureon day 1,1 month and 2months of prosthesis deliverymeasurement of masticatory performance of partial dentures made of Versacryle and CAD/CAM technology

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026