Skip to content

99mTc-H7ND SPECT/CT Imaging in NSCLC

99mTc-H7ND SPECT/CT Imaging in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Clinical Application Research in Efficacy Evaluation and Efficacy Prediction

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05999214
Enrollment
150
Registered
2023-08-21
Start date
2023-09-13
Completion date
2026-08-10
Last updated
2023-09-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

NSCLC

Keywords

99mTc-H7ND, SPECT/CT, NSCLC, diagnostic efficiency, therapeutic effect evaluation

Brief summary

To study the clinical application of 99mTc-H7ND SPECT/CT imaging in the efficacy evaluation and prediction of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Detailed description

This study was a prospective, controlled, single-center clinical study. To evaluate the value of 99mTc-H7ND imaging in the evaluation of stable disease in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) assessed by RECIST1.1, and to predict the efficacy of subsequent treatment (second-line treatment). Patients with NSCLC confirmed by cytology or pathology, who were unable to undergo radical surgery because of recurrence, metastasis, or their own conditions, and who had completed 2-4 cycles of first-line therapy and had RECIST1.1 assessment (SD) were divided into 2 groups: Experimental group: 99mTc-H7ND SPECT/CT imaging performed Control group: 99mTc-H7ND SPECT/CT imaging was not performed

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TEST99mTc-H7ND SPECT/CT imaging performed

99mTc-H7ND SPECT/CT imaging positive (+) was defined as the presence of at least one measurable lesion and the uptake of the lesion was greater than that of normal liver in the experimental group, and patients were divided into SD+ and SD-. According to the guidelines and routine clinical practice, SD- patients were treated with the original regimen or maintenance treatment, and SD+ patients were divided into continuation of the original regimen or second-line treatment according to the MDT discussion results.

Sponsors

First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients aged from 18 to 80 years old; 2. patients with NSCLC confirmed by needle aspiration cytology or surgical pathology, who cannot undergo radical surgery due to recurrence, metastasis or patient's own conditions; 3. Has completed 2-4 cycles of first-line therapy (including chemotherapy, immunotherapy, chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy, chemotherapy combined with targeted therapy, etc.), and has SD assessed by RECIST 1.1 during the same period; 4. Patients had at least one measurable lesion; 5. No local radiotherapy for primary or metastatic lesions within 28 days; 6. ECOG score 0-2; 7. Expected survival time ≥3 months; 8. Voluntarily participate and sign informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. Women who plan to become pregnant within 6 months, or are pregnant or lactating. 2. Patients with severe brain or bone metastases; 3. Severe anemia and severe liver and kidney damage; 4. Pathological or long-term follow-up results may not be available; 5. The relevant control imaging data and clinical data were not available; 6. Severe illness is difficult to cooperate (such as acute cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events or serious cardiovascular diseases); 7. Received any surgery or invasive treatment or procedure within 4 weeks before enrollment; 8. Cannot tolerate standard second-line therapy or other first-line therapies. 9. Known allergy to 99mTc-H7ND or any of its components; He had a history of severe allergies; 10. Protocol imaging contraindications were present; 11. The investigator considered it inappropriate to participate in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
DCRRepeat visits were performed 8-12 weeks and 12 weeks after the baseline assessmentComparison of DCR in groups of NSCLC patients with stable disease assessed by RECIST1.1.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PFSRepeat visits were performed 8-12 weeks and 12 weeks after the baseline assessmentThe PFS of NSCLC patients with stable disease assessed by RECIST1.1
OSRepeat visits were performed 8-12 weeks and 12 weeks after the baseline assessmentThe OS of NSCLC patients with stable disease assessed by RECIST1.1

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactRui Gao
jacky_mg@xjtufh.edu.cn0086-13772488039
Backup ContactXinru Li
lixinru@xjtu.edu.cn0086-15991432495

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026