Skip to content

Enteral Nutrition in Acute Generalized Peritonitis

Effects of Early Enteral Nutrition With a Locally Produced Protein-energy Ration Versus a Marketed Nutritional Solution in Patients Operated on for Acute Generalized Peritonitis

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05997745
Acronym
PAG/NUTRI
Enrollment
76
Registered
2023-08-18
Start date
2023-08-20
Completion date
2023-10-30
Last updated
2023-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Enteral and Supplement Feeds Adverse Reaction, Peritonitis; Acute

Brief summary

Hospitals in South Kivu always have problems supplying artificial enteral nutritional products because of their high cost and low availability in our areas. While the Province has cereals, knowing their nutritional composition would enable the formulation of a nutritional product based on local protein-energy products. Hence the questions below: Can a local cereal-based protein-energy ration be used instead of a costly imported artificial nutritional solution to improve the nutritional status of patients operated on for PAG? What is the tolerance of this early enteral nutrition on the healing and functional recovery of patients compared with an artificial nutritional solution? To answer these questions, a randomized clinical trial has been designed with the following objectives: * To formulate an enteral diet using cereals available in our environment with a protein-calorie composition superimposable on the artificial enteral ration, * Evaluate the tolerance and advantages of early enteral nutrition with a locally manufactured protein-caloric ration vs. a commercially available artificial nutritional solution in patients undergoing surgery for PAG.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTstudy group

Patients will receive early enteral locally nutrition postoperatively following surgery for peritonitis

Sponsors

Université Evangélique enAfrique
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patient operated for peritonitis with intestinal suture during treatment * have a q-SOFA score of 1 to 2 * surgeon's agreement to enteral feeding * at risk of malnutrition (BMC)

Exclusion criteria

* q SOFA score \> 2 * patients with tare (diabetes, HIV, renal failure)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tolerability of feeding10 days after surgeryWe will screen complications after feeding

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
nutritional surveillance2 days after, 5 days after, 10 days after feedingchanges in nutritional status using body mass index, albumin measurement, anthropometric data

Contacts

Primary ContactJEAN PAUL CIKWANINE, MASTER
jpcikwa1@gmail.com+243990860491

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026