Cardiovascular Complication
Conditions
Brief summary
In patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia, the clinical utility of non-invasive hemodynamic status monitoring equipment using HemoVista is compared with invasive hemodynamic status monitoring equipment FloTrac.
Detailed description
For patients who are scheduled to monitor invasive blood pressure, invasive hemodynamic monitoring using FloTrac and additional HemoVista sensors are attached and output data are obtained at the same time during general anesthesia. FloTrac is used to conduct conventional anesthesia and fluid therapy, and the accuracy of HemoVista, a non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring equipment, is compared through prospective observational studies.
Interventions
OTHERHemoVista
additional attatchment of non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring HemoVista with FloTrac
Sponsors
Seoul National University Hospital
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Adult patients aged 20 or older who undergo surgery under general anesthesia for more than two hours * invasive close hemodynamic monitoring with FloTrac is needed
Exclusion criteria
* problems in site where HemoVista is attached
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| degree of agreement in cardiac output | during surgery | degree of agreement in cardiac output between HemoVista and FloTrac |
Countries
South Korea
Contacts
Primary ContactHee-Soo Kim
Outcome results
None listed