Skip to content

Cervical Cancer Screening Based on First-void Urine Self-sampling to Reach un(Der)-Screened Women: ScreenUrSelf Trial

Cervical Cancer Screening Based on First-void Urine Self-sampling to Reach un(Der)-Screened Women: ScreenUrSelf Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05996783
Acronym
ScreenUrSelf
Enrollment
48000
Registered
2023-08-18
Start date
2023-05-25
Completion date
2026-09-30
Last updated
2025-06-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cervix Cancer, Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia, Human Papilloma Virus, HPV-Related Cervical Carcinoma

Keywords

Biomarker, First-void urine, Vaginal sample, Screening, Triage, Self-sampling, Prevention

Brief summary

The goal of the ScreenUrSelf trial is to increase cervical cancer screening attendance and compliance to follow-up by offering a first-void urine self-sampling alternative to women who are currently not participating in the organized cervical cancer screening program (defined in this project as un(der)-screened women), either on the woman or her physician's personal initiative, or by responding on the invitation letter.

Detailed description

Patient: In this population-based study we target real un(der)-screened women, i.e., women (31-64y) eligible for the Flemish population-based cervical cancer screening program without any cytology/histology/pathological result retrieved from the Belgian Cancer Registry (BCR) for at least the last six years (i.e., two screening rounds). Women who opted out of the screening program, who are pregnant (self-reported), underwent total hysterectomy, have (had) cervical or uterine cancer, or are included in other Centre for Cancer Detection (CvKO) pilot projects are not eligible. Intervention: The proposed randomized controlled trial (RCT) will be embedded in the Flemish organized cervical cancer screening program, which is coordinated by CvKO under governance of the Flemish government. The goal is to reach women who are eligible but do not participate in cervical cancer screening, by offering two self-sampling methods (first-void urine and vaginal) in an opt-in and -out strategy (total of four interventions) to collect samples for primary high-risk (hr) Human Papillomavirus (HPV) testing, and if positive, reflex 1) cytology on a Pap smear (standard of care) and 2) methylation marker triage (index test). Comparison: The two control arms include 1) no intervention; and 2) sending (recall) invitation letters to women, inviting them to make an appointment for a Pap smear (i.e., current practise within the organized cervical cancer screening program in Flanders). Primary outcome: The primary outcome is the actual response rate, i.e., proportions of women that participate in each intervention and in the control arms at 12 months after initiation of the intervention (the intervention being one of six study arms). Response in this project is defined as having a preventive cervical screen exam, either by a self-sample or by a physician-taken Pap smear, at 12 months after initiation of the intervention.

Interventions

Women will self-collect a first-void urine sample at home upon receipt of the study package using the Colli-Pee Small Volumes (10 mL) device (Novosanis, Belgium). The collector tube is prefilled with a preservative (UCM, Novosanis, Belgium). Women will send the collector vial containing first-void urine along with the informed consent form to the laboratory at University of Antwerp using the prestamped envelope.

Women will self-collect a vaginal sample at home upon receipt of the study package using the Evalyn Brush device (Rovers Medical Devices, The Netherlands). Women will send the used brush along with the informed consent form to the laboratory at University of Antwerp using the prestamped envelope.

Sponsors

Antwerp University Hospital (UZA)
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Centre for Cancer Detection (CvKO)
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Sciensano
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Universiteit Antwerpen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
31 Years to 64 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Eligible for cervical cancer screening within the organized Population-based Screening Program in Flanders: * Female * Residing in Flanders, Belgium * Not actively opted out of the organized cervical cancer screening program * No history of total hysterectomy (data available since 2002) * No (former) diagnosis of cervical or uterine cancer (data available as of 2008) * Not included in other CvKO pilot projects * No cervical result registered in the cytohistopathological register of BCR and no information in the administrative data from health insurance companies (IMA) on PAP smears taken for at least the last 6 years (i.e., two screening rounds) * 31-64 years old (birth year 1959-1992)

Exclusion criteria

* Being pregnant or 6 weeks postpartum (self-reported after receiving the study letter/package) * Participation during menstruation or within the 3 following days is a contraindication * Not able to understand the study materials and participation form (informed consent form)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Response rate10 months (until 31/03/2024)Proportions of women that participate in each intervention (measured by PP\* and ITT\*) and in the control arms (measured by Pap smears taken) within 10 months after the intervention. \*PP: participation in intervention arm measured by self-sample analyses only \*\*ITT: participation in intervention arm measured by self-sample analyses or Pap smears taken

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PreferenceThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearPreference and attitudes of women between intervention arms (measured via a questionnaire)
Age-related differences in response rate10 months (until 31/03/2024)Age-related differences in response rates within and between different study arms Response rates: Proportions of women that participate in each intervention (measured by PP\* and ITT\*) and in the control arms (measured by Pap smears taken) within 10 months after the intervention. \*PP: participation in intervention arm measured by self-sample analyses only \*\*ITT: participation in intervention arm measured by self-sample analyses or Pap smears taken
Socio-economic status-related differences differences in response rate10 months (until 31/03/2024)Socio-economic status-related differences in response rates within and between different study arms Response rates: Proportions of women that participate in each intervention (measured by PP\* and ITT\*) and in the control arms (measured by Pap smears taken) within 10 months after the intervention. \*PP: participation in intervention arm measured by self-sample analyses only \*\*ITT: participation in intervention arm measured by self-sample analyses or Pap smears taken
Compliance19 months (until 31/12/2024)1. Compliance to a hrHPV positive result on a self-sample measured by standard of care follow-up, i.e., a Pap smear taken by a clinician. 2. Compliance to an abnormal Pap smear measured by standard of care follow-up.
Clinical accuracy of methylation assayThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearTest-positivity, positive predictive value, referral rate to colposcopy, and detection rate CIN2+ of a methylation-based reflex test (index test) to triage hrHPV positive self-sample in un(der)screened women, compared to reflex cytology on a Pap smear (comparator test); absolute measures in each arm and ratios of measures between arms. Test-positivity, positive predictive value, referral rate to colposcopy, and detection rate of CIN2+ will be combined to report clinical accuracy.
Cost-effectivenessThrough study completion, an average of 1 year1. Differences in time needed per women to obtain a test result between study arms 2. Differences in costs per women between the different study arms 3. Differences in total cost between the different study arms The above differences in time and costs will be combined to report cost-effectiveness.
Clinical accuracy of HPV assayThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearTest-positivity, positive predictive value, referral rate to colposcopy, and detection rate of CIN2+ of a hrHPV positive result on a self-sample in un(der)-screened women; absolute measures in each arm and ratios of measures between arms. Test-positivity, positive predictive value, referral rate to colposcopy, and detection rate of CIN2+ will be combined to report clinical accuracy.

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026