Skip to content

CsA+ATG+AVA vs. CsA+AVA for the Treatment of Newly-diagnosed SAA in the Elderly

Ciclosporin + Antithymocyte Immunoglobulin + Avatrombpag Versus Ciclosporin + Avatrombpag for the Treatment of Severe Aplastic Anemia in the Elderly

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05996393
Enrollment
86
Registered
2023-08-18
Start date
2023-09-15
Completion date
2025-02-27
Last updated
2025-04-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aplastic Anemia

Brief summary

This is a multicenter, prospective, randonmized study. Our previous retrospective study showed that for SAA patients who were intolerant to ATG, CsA+ eltrombopag (EPAG) had similar efficacy to CsA+ATG+EPAG. Since the action mechanism of AVA and EPAG is not exactly the same, and the metabolic level of the elderly is not the same as that of younger patients, it is unknown whether there are predictive factors of efficacy in the treatment of AVA. We wondered whether CsA+AVA could achieve an efficacy similar to CsA+ATG+AVA in the Elderly. Meanwhile, to explore the predictive factors of efficacy, to find out a safe and effective treatment strategy for the Elderly.

Detailed description

Aplastic anemia (AA) can be divided into severe AA (SAA) and non-severe AA (NSAA), according to the severity of the disease. For SAA patients with o condition of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, guideline recommended ciclosporin A (CsA) + anti-thymocyte immunoglobulin (ATG) + thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RA) as the first-line therapy. Our previous retrospective study showed that for SAA patients who were intolerant to ATG, CsA+ eltrombopag (EPAG) had similar efficacy to CsA+ATG+EPAG. However, the adverse effects such as hepatotoxicity and gasrointestinal disorder limit its application in elderly SAA.Compared with EPAG, AVA has no hepatotoxicity and less other adverse effects, but there was few studies for AA. Our previous study demonstrated that AVA was effective in 55% of refractory AA. Since the action mechanism of AVA and EPAG is not exactly the same, and the metabolic level of the elderly is not the same as that of younger patients, it is unknown whether there are predictive factors of efficacy in the treatment of AVA. Thus, we wondered whether CsA+AVA could achieve an efficacy similar to CsA+ATG+AVA in the Elderly.

Interventions

rabbit anti-human thymocyte immunoglobulin (r-ATG 3mg/kg/d), intravenously, 5 days;

DRUGCiclosporin

3-5 mg/kg/d orally, trough concentrations: 100-200 ng/ml

DRUGAvatrombopag

60 mg/d orally, 24 weeks

Sponsors

Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients with newly diagnosed severe aplastic anemia, aged greater than 60 years. 2. Patients met the diagnostic criteria of severe aplastic anemia (SAA). 3. Complete all screening assessments as outlined in the test protocol. 4. Without or with no more than 1 month treatment of ciclosporine, tacrolimus, glucocortocoid, or TPO-RAs. 5. Agree to sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

1. Known diagnosis of congenital hematopoietic failure disorders (e.g. Fanconi anemia) and other causes of cytopenia. 2. Patients with uncontrolled bleeding and/or infection despite standard treatment. 3. Patients with previous history of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. 4. Patients with previous history of thrombosis in 1 year. 5. Patients with concurrent malignancy. 6. Those who are considered unsuitable for enrollment by the investigator. 7. Abnormal renal function: creatinine \> 1.2 normal upper limit, albumin \< 0.9 normal lower limit, or CLcr \< 30 ml/min. 8. Abnormal liver function: transaminase \> 2.5 normal upper limit, or tota bilirubin \> 2.5 normal upper limit. 9. Patients with severe heart, liver or renal disease.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall response rate6 monthProportion of patient who achieved partial response or complete response

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Complete response rate6 monthProportion of patient who achieved complete response (HGB\>100g/L, PLT\>100×109/L, ANC\>1.0×109/L)
Relapse rate12 monthProportion of patient who relapse
Adverse event rate3, 6, 12 monthProportion of patient who adverse events

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026