Skip to content

A Comparative Study of Support Devices for Ventilator-Assisted ICU Patients

Comparison of the Benefits of Different Types of Wearable Respirator Support Devices for Critically Ill Patients in the ICU During Early Mobilization

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05996055
Enrollment
30
Registered
2023-08-16
Start date
2023-07-31
Completion date
2025-01-31
Last updated
2024-09-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Device Dislocation

Keywords

Intensive unit care, Early mobilization, Mechanical ventilation

Brief summary

Assisting critically ill patients with early mobilization or early ambulation during their stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) can reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation use, length of ICU or hospital stay, probability of complications during hospitalization, and sedation days in the ICU and improve disease prognosis. However, over 80% of critically ill patients have endotracheal tubes and require the use of mechanical ventilators in the ICU, and due to the numerous invasive treatments and tubes, there are high concerns regarding the safety of tube stability and risk of tube dislodgement during early mobilization. Although there are commercially available fixed tracheal tubes or external support devices for breathing tubes to prevent displacement, they do not solve the problems of the weight of the breathing tube during ambulation or endotracheal tube slippage. Therefore, through interdisciplinary collaboration, the investigator has designed a wearable support device (Type A support device). The unique design of the fixed frame uses a plug-in-latch shape to fix the Y-shaped breathing tube to the patient's chest position. In addition to reducing the displacement of the free section of the endotracheal tube downwards, it can also fix the main body of the breathing tube. The dual-disc strap method allows adjustment of the position and tightness for patients of different body sizes, and a single specification can be used for patients of various body shapes. Currently, a modified version of this wearable support device (Type B support device) has been designed based on clinical suggestions.The purpose of this study is to compare the feasibility, safety, and comfort of using the Type A-support device and the Type B-support device to assist in supporting breathing tubes during early ambulation in ICU patients using mechanical ventilators.

Interventions

DEVICEimproved version_support device

designed the NTUH version\_support device based on the clinical suggestion.

DEVICEthe NTUH version_support device

original designed by NTUH

Sponsors

National Taiwan University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Glasgow Coma Scale score of ≥6, 2. relatively stable respiratory status (oxygen saturation \>92%, settings on the mechanical ventilator: fraction of inspired oxygen ≤60%, positive end-expiratory pressure ≤10 cmH2O) 3. a stable cardiovascular system (resting heart rate ≤130 and \>40 beats per minute) 4. no requirement for high-dose vasopressors \>0.2 μg/kg/min).

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients with temporary limb immobilization as prescribed by the physician. 2. Patients with a tendency to bleed. 3. Patients with pre-existing mental abnormalities. 4. Patients who are expected to die within the next 24 hours or are primarily receiving palliative care in the intensive care unit. 5. Patients with sustained intracranial pressure elevation (\> 20 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)). 6. Pregnant patients. 7. Uncontrolled epilepsy. 8. Acute myocardial infarction or rapidly progressing neuromuscular diseases occurring in the intensive care unit. 9. Patients with abnormal skin conditions such as skin abrasions, redness, swelling, etc., in the chest/back area.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
wearing timeFrom date of randomization up to 5 daysthe time taken to wear support device
removal timeFrom date of randomization up to 5 daysthe time taken to remove support device

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
5-min heart rate variability (HRV)From date of randomization up to 5 daysincluding low-to-high-frequency power ratio (LF/HF) and standard deviation of NN intervals(SDNN)
mean values of the rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI)From date of randomization up to 5 daysrecorded the ratio of respiratory rate (RR) and tidal volume (VT) and calulated by RR to VT
user self-reported function, and device satisfactionFrom date of randomization up to 5 daysself-made questionnaire
adverse eventFrom date of randomization up to 5 daysObserve the abnormality of the skin on the chest/back of the base plate before and after wearing it; Record the number of incidents of accidental slippage of the external oral line while performing early ambulation while wearing the support device.

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026