Skip to content

Physiological, Cognitive, and Personal Features in the Link Between Placebo-effect and Variability of Pain Reports

Exploring the Role of Physiological, Cognitive, and Personal Features in the Link Between Placebo-effect and Variability of Pain Reports

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05994118
Enrollment
150
Registered
2023-08-16
Start date
2021-03-21
Completion date
2024-03-31
Last updated
2023-08-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Back Pain

Brief summary

This study attempt to identify whether and how factors known or considered to be related with analgesic placebo effect or variability of pain reports separately, may contribute to their coupling. Among these factors - personal traits such as optimism, focus of attention, suggestibility, and short-term memory along with characteristics of stress and relaxation. Additionally, the role of pain sensitivity and the individual's pain modulation profile in the relationship between analgesic placebo effect and variability of pain reports will be examined.

Detailed description

Data will be collected from 130 patients with non-specific chronic back pain that will be recruited for a prospective cross-sectional study. To characterize the main study variables, the participants will undergo the Focused analgesia selection test (FAST) which evaluates within-subjects variability of pain reports, and placebo manipulation containing administration of an inert injection accompanied by a verbal suggestion, which is expected to produce placebo effects. The involvement of additional factors considered associated with the within-subjects variability of pain reports and the placebo response will be explored. Stress and well-being characteristics will be examined by measuring cortisol levels in saliva and in hair, salivary level of Secretory Immune globulin A (SIgA), and an autonomic nervous system function and a stress perception questionnaire. Personal traits such as suggestibility, optimism, and Focus of attention, will be examined using questionnaires. Memory will be assessed by memory task, and factors related to the pain modulation system will be examined using psychophysical tests, and a pain sensitivity questionnaire.

Interventions

OTHERNaCl 0.9% (normal saline)

Subcutaneous normal saline injection

OTHERMagnetized Normal Saline

Magnetized Normal Saline

Sponsors

Western Galilee Hospital-Nahariya
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
University of Haifa
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Subcutaneous injection of Saline solution (NACL 0.9%) in the buttock

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Literate adults * Aged 18 - 80 years * A diagnosis of chronic back pain * Sufferings from back pain during the last 3 months or more, with an intensity of 3 or more on a 0-10 NRS

Exclusion criteria

* Mental retardation or cognitive impairment * Pregnancy or breast-feeding * Malignancy and a diagnosis of malignant disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Reduction of pain following placebo injectionHalf an hour after injectionThe reduction in pain intensity on the 0-100 numerical rating scale (NRS) after normal saline injection
Within-subjects variability of day-to-day clinical pain reports7 days before study visitThe variance of within person pain scores reported on a 0-100 Visual Analog Scale VAS during 7 days via pain-dairy at baseline

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Focused Analgesia selection task (FAST)Once, at baselineExperimental paradigm which allow calculation of within-subjects variability of pain reports in response to thermal stimuli

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain modulation - Conditioned pain modulationOnce, at baselineChange in pain intensity on the 0-100 numerical rating scale (NRS) in response to concurrent noxious stimuli
Biological markers - cortisol1 day (Before and after administration of saline)Saliva cortisol levels
Biological markers - secretory IgA1 day (Before and after administration of saline)Saliva secretory IgA level
Biological markers - oxytocin1 day (Before and after administration of saline)Saliva oxytocin level
Autonomic measures - Heart rate variability1 day (Before and after administration of saline)As measured by a monitor
Autonomic measures - blood pressure1 day (Before and after administration of saline)As measured by a monitor
Short-term memoryOnce, at baselinevia the Digit Span test
Questionnaire - perceived stressOnce, at baselinevia the perceived stress scale
Questionnaire - OptimismOnce, at baselineVia the life orientation test revised (LOT-R)
Questionnaire - pain sensitivityOnce, at baselineVia the pain sensitivity questionnaire (PSQ)
Questionnaire - interoceptive awarenessOnce, at baselineVia the Multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness (MAIA questionnaire)
Questionnaire - direction of attentionOnce, at baselineVia the Self consciousness scale revised
Questionnaire Body awarenessOnce, at baselinevia the body awareness Questionnaire (BAQ)
Questionnaire - suggestibilityOnce, at baselineVia the short suggestibility scale (SSS)
Pain sensitivity via QST1 day (Before and after administration of saline)Mechanical pain thresholds
Questionnaire - expectationsOnce, at baselinevia the expect Questionnaire
Pain modulation - Temporal SummationOnce, at baselineChange in pain intensity on the 0-100 numerical rating scale (NRS) in response to the first and last electrical noxious stimuli

Countries

Israel

Contacts

Primary ContactRoi Treister, PhD
rtreister@univ.haifa.ac.il0533839935

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026