Skip to content

Venus-Vitae Pivotal Study Smart-Align Study

Multicenter Pivotal Study to Evaluate the Treatment of Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis With Next-Generation Venus-Vitae Transcatheter Heart Valve (THV) System

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05991271
Enrollment
150
Registered
2023-08-14
Start date
2023-10-31
Completion date
2029-06-30
Last updated
2023-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aortic Valve Stenosis

Brief summary

The purpose is to evaluate the safety, effectiveness and performance of Venus-Vitae Transcatheter Heart Valve System in patients with severe aortic stenosis.

Detailed description

This trial is a prospective, multi-center, non-randomized interventional study to evaluate the safety, effectiveness and performance of the Venus-Vitae Transcatheter Heart Valve System in patients with severe aortic stenosis. Clinical visits will be scheduled at screening, pre-discharge, 30 days, 6 months, 12 months and annually thereafter to 5 years.

Interventions

DEVICEVenus-Vitae Transcatheter Heart Valve System

The Venus-Vitae THV is comprised of balloon-expandable and radiopaque cobalt-chromium alloy frame, porcine pericardium tri-leaflet, porcine pericardium inner skirt, polyurethane outer skirt, PTFE assembly sutures, and three radiopaque gold markers (Figure 1). The valve utilizes Venus Endura technology and stored in a non-aqueous condition.

Sponsors

Venus MedTech (HangZhou) Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age ≥ 18 years 2. Patients with the symptoms of severe aortic stenosis 3. Severe aortic stenosis (AS, grade 3+), defined as AVA ≤ 1 cm2 (AVAi ≤ 0.6 cm2/m3) or Vmax ≥ 4.0 m/s or MPG ≥ 40 mmHg determined by echocardiography 4. Patients deemed for cardiac intervention by a heart team 5. Patients of all surgical risk categories can be enrolled in this study, but should follows local medical practices and regulatories. 6. Patients or their legal reprensentatives are willing to participate in the study and provide written informed consent, and agree to follow the follow-up requirements

Exclusion criteria

A subject meeting any of the following criteria shall be excluded: Co-morbidities 1. Previous mechanical or biological aortic valve replacement 2. Untreated mitral, tricuspid or pulmonary valve diseases requiring procedural intervention 3. Acute myocardial infact within 30 days prior to index procedure 4. Untreated clinical significant coronary artery disease requiring revascularization 5. Any therapeutic invasive cardiac procedure performed within 30 days (or drug-eluting coronary stent/scaffold implant within 6 months) 6. Sever symptomatic carotid artery stenosis 7. Stroke or TIA within 3 months or Modified Rankin Scale ≥ 4 disability 8. Chronic kidney disease (eGFR\<30 mL/min/1.73m2) 9. Haemotologic disorders: Leukopenia (WBC \< 3000 cell/mL), anemia (Hgb \< 9 g/dL), thrombocytopenia (Plt\< 50,000 cell/mL), or any known blood clotting disorder, deemed clinically significant after consultation with Haematooncology specialists 10. Severe right heart dysfunction Anatomical 11. LVEF \< 20% 12. Echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus, or vegetation 13. Inappropriate anatomy for femoral introduction and delivery of study device 14. Native aortic valve geometry and size unfavorable for study device anchoring General 15. Haemodynamics instability requiring inotropic support or intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) or other hemodynamic support device, or any mechanical heart assistance 16. Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to antiplatelet, antithrombotic medications, or cobalt-chromium leading to be unable to undergo index procedure per physicians' judgement 17. Life expectancy ≤ 1 year due to noncardiac reasons 18. Active infection requiring antibiotic therapy including infective endocarditis 19. Planned relevant concomitant procedure within 30 days post index procedure 20. Pregnant, breastfeeding or intend to become pregnant within 1 year

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The rate of deaths at the one-year follow-up visit post procedure1 YearsAll-cause mortality (The rate of deaths at the one-year follow-up visit post procedure)
Acceptable Hemodynamic Performance at 30 days30 DaysAcceptable Bio-prosthesis Hemodynamic Performance at 30 days, defined as: * Mean gradient \< 20mmHg * Less than moderate aortic regurgitation (perivalvular and transvalvular)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The rate of device success is defined as the followingUp to 1 weekDevice success (in-hospital) (VARC-3\[1\]) (The rate of device success during the in-hospital) * Freedom from mortality * Freedom from surgery or intervention related to the device or a major vascular or access-related or cardiac structural complication * Intended performance of the valve (mean gradient \< 20 mmHg, peak velocity \<3 m/s, and less than moderate aortic regurgitation)
The rate of acceptable valve function at pre-discharge by echocardiogram defined as the following:Up to 1 weekAcceptable valve function at pre-discharge by echocardiogram (The rate of follow events during the follow-up) * Freedom from moderate or greater patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) * MPG \<20mmHg * Freedom from moderate or greater regurgitation (transvalvular and paravalvular) * Freedom from reoperation or intervention
The rate of freedom from severe coronary overlap assessed by post-implant angiogramimmediately after the procedureFreedom from severe coronary overlap assessed by post-implant angiogram
Occurrence of the following adverse events echocardiogram during follow-up5 YearsOccurrence of the following adverse events echocardiogram during follow-up (The rate of follow events during the follow-up) * All-cause mortality * All stroke * Life-threatening bleeding * Acute MI * Heart failure hospitalizations * New permanent pacemaker implantation * Major vascular complication * Acute kidney injury * Aortic valve re-intervention (surgical or transcatheter) * Valve thrombosis * Structural valve deterioration
The rate of freedom from mild or greater PVL by echocardiogram during follow-up5 YearsFreedom from mild or greater PVL by echocardiogram during follow-up
New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification during follow-up5 YearsNew York Heart Association (NYHA) classification during follow-up
The rate of freedom from mild or greater commissure misalignment assessed by post-implant angiogram and/or 30-day CT30-DaysFreedom from mild or greater commissure misalignment assessed by post-implant angiogram and/or 30-day CT (post-implant 30-day CT scan is not mandatory for each subjects)
Technical success is defined as the followingDuring the ProcedureTechnical success (at exit from procedure room) (VARC-3\[1\]) (The rate of Technical success at the Procedure) * Freedom from mortality * Successful access, delivery of the device, and retrieval of the delivery system * Correct positioning of a single prosthetic heart valve into the proper anatomical location * Freedom from surgery or intervention related to the device or a major vascular or access-related, or cardiac structural complication

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026