Skip to content

HYPoxaEmic Respiratory Failure and Awake Prone Ventilation

HYPoxaEmic Respiratory Failure and Awake Prone Ventilation

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05990101
Acronym
Hyper-AP
Enrollment
262
Registered
2023-08-14
Start date
2023-05-12
Completion date
2028-09-01
Last updated
2023-08-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypoxemia, Respiratory Failure

Keywords

Awake prone, Respiratory failure, ARDS, Hypoxaemia

Brief summary

The goal of this prospective multi-centre randomised controlled trial is to determine if addition of awake prone positioning to standard oxygen, high flow oxygen therapy and non-invasive ventilation may reduce the rates of endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation.

Detailed description

Effectiveness of prone position in mechanically ventilated patients was investigated extensively. During the Covid-19 pandemic a sudden increase in cases of acute respiratory failure, resulted in renewed interest and numerous studies on applying this concept in spontaneously breathing patients and using this in conjunction with less invasive respiratory support. However, evidence form the Covid-19 trials may not be directly extrapolated to other acute respiratory distress causes (for example bacterial pneumonia) as pathology of lung injury is distinctly different. Even though first reports of awake prone positioning were published nearly 30 years ago, but to date there are no prospective randomised trials in adult population treated for acute lung injury unrelated to Covid-19. Existing publications range from case reports (lung transplantation and drowning cases) to small feasibility trials involving 15-20 patients and also neonatal and paediatric populations. Considering that patients with acute lung injury constitute a significant proportion of routine intensive care unit population, results of this study would be highly relevant for the daily practice in intensive care medicine.We are aiming to conduct a prospective multi-centre randomised controlled trial comparing standard care alone with awake prone positioning and standard care in spontaneously breathing patients admitted to Intensive or Intermediate Care Units for acute non-Covid-19 hypoxemic respiratory failure.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALAwake prone position (APP)

Awake prone position for 4 or more hours per day for the first 72 hours following randomisation.

Sponsors

Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos
CollaboratorOTHER
Vilnius University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

By the nature of the awake prone intervention, it will not be possible to blind clinicians; however, interventions will be blinded to data analysts and outcome assessors.

Intervention model description

Participants will be allocated to the awake prone or standard care groups on a 1:1 ratio.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients admitted to intensive care unit for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. * Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure is defined by respiratory rate ≥25 breaths/min, and partial pressure of oxygen in the arterial blood (PaO2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ≤300 mm Hg or oxygen saturation (SpO2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ratio \<235 while spontaneously breathing under standard oxygen with oxygen flow rate of at least 10 L/min, high flow oxygen therapy or non-invasive ventilation. For patients under standard oxygen, FiO2 is calculated according to the following formula: FiO2=0.21 + 0.03 per litre of supplemental oxygen. * Informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* impaired consciousness - Glasgow coma score \<14; * inability to cooperate or prone position intolerance; * immediate indications for endotracheal intubation; * patients with do-not-intubate order at time of inclusion; * patients with contraindication to high flow oxygen therapy (HFOT) or non-invasive ventilation (NIV); * Partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) above 50 mm Hg and quantitative measure of the acidity (pH) \<7,3; * vasopressor dose \>0.3 µg/kg/min of norepinephrine-equivalent to maintain systolic blood pressure \>90 mmHg; * Covid-19 positive

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of endotracheal intubationWithin 30 days of randomisationIncidence of endotracheal intubation in both groups

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
MortalityWithin 1 year of randomisationMortality during intensive care unit stay, in hospital, at day 90 and at 1 year
Duration of mechanical ventilationWithin 30 days of randomisationTotal number of mechanical ventilation days from endotracheal intubation to discharge from intensive care unit
One year mortalityWithin 1 year of randomisationIncidence or death during one year of randomisation
Health related quality of lifeWithin 1 year of randomisationHeath related quality of life assessed by Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) one year of randomisation
Length of intensive care unit and hospital stayWithin 30 days of randomisationTotal cumulative number of days spent in intensive care unit and hospital

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tolerance of awake prone positioningWithin 72 hours of randomisationProportion of patients in the intervention group completing at least 4 hours per day of awake prone positioning and number of awake prone hours per day

Countries

Lithuania, United Kingdom

Contacts

Primary ContactTomas Jovaisa, Prof
tomas.jovaisa@santa.lt+37062697567

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026