Skip to content

Air-polishing With Erythritol During Orthodontic Tretament

Air-polishing With Erythritol on Prevalence of White Spot Lesions and Gingivitis During Orthodontic Treatment With Fixed Appliances: a Randomized Clinical Trial of 2-years Duration

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05989750
Acronym
AirPort
Enrollment
60
Registered
2023-08-14
Start date
2023-09-11
Completion date
2028-09-01
Last updated
2026-05-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Inflammation Gum, White Spot Lesion

Brief summary

Patients with multi-bracketed fixed orthodontic treatment are at increased risk of developing white spot lesions (WSL) and gingivitis. Various preventive strategies have been examined to prevent the development of WSLs. During initial non-surgical periodontal therapy, the use of subgingival air-polishing with erythritol powder has shown promising results in reducing deep pockets and gingival inflammation. The efficacy of its use as monotherapy in preventing WSLs and gingival inflammation in patients during orthodontic treatment, has not yet been tested. The primary objective of the present study is to compare the effectiveness of an air-polishing device used as monotherapy versus ultrasonic instrumentation (the current gold standard procedure) in preventing white spot lesions (WSL) and gingivitis among young patients undergoing multi-bracketed fixed orthodontic treatment.

Detailed description

This is a randomized clinical study for evaluating the performance of an air-polishing device in preventing WSLs and gingivitis among patients undergoing multi-bracketed fixed orthodontic treatment. The null hypothesis tested is that there is no difference between the air-polishing device and the conventional ultrasonic device in preventing WSLs and gingivitis during orthodontic treatment. Clinical examination and clinical samples will be taken before, during and after orthodontic treatment. It is a single center study of 3 years duration involving samples of 60 patients attending the Division of Orthodontics for treatment. Half of the participants will be randomly assigned for treatment with the air-polishing device in every orthodontic appointment, meaning once per month, the other half will be treated with a standard ultrasonic scaler every six months. The study duration for each participant will be approximately 2 years. The investigators will then analyze the prevalence of WSLs using the Quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) method. Gingivitis will be evaluated throughout the study by using standard clinical parameters; the antimicrobial efficacy against several known periodontal pathogens and the host-response (inflammatory markers in GCF) will be measured by the qPCR assay and the multiplex immunoassay, respectively. Clinical evaluation and collection of samples for microbial and host response analysis will be performed every 6 months. Incidence of bracket debonding we will be calculated and compared.

Interventions

Ultrasonic scaling for subgingival cleaning every 6 months for 2 years according to the manufacturer's procedures.

DEVICEAir-Flow Prophylaxis Master

AIR-FLOW PROPHYLAXIS MASTER with erythritol powder (AIR FLOW Powder Plus) will be used every month for 2 years for subgingival cleaning according to the manufacturer's procedures.

Sponsors

Catherine Giannopoulou
Lead SponsorOTHER
University of Geneva, Switzerland
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Masking description

The examiner, the biostatistician and people working in the laboratory for the analyses, will be blinded for allocation group. Only the operator and the participant will be aware of the type of treatment based on the computer-generated allocation table that will be kept at the Trial Master File (TMF) of the study.

Intervention model description

Randomized, examiner-masked clinical trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 16 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects about to undergo fixed orthodontic treatment will be invited to participate. * Age between 12 and 16 years only participants * Informed written consent obtained by the parents

Exclusion criteria

* Clinically significant concomitant disease states (e.g., renal failure, hepatic dysfunction, cardiovascular disease, etc.), * Known or suspected non-compliance, drug or alcohol abuse * Inability to follow the procedures of the investigation, e.g. due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia, etc. of the subject * Participation in another investigation with an investigational drug or another MD within the 30 days preceding and during the present investigation * Previous enrolment into the current investigation * Enrolment of the PI, his/her family members, employees and other dependent persons * History of fixed orthodontic treatment * Defects on enamel on labial surfaces of the teeth * Untreated cavitated lesions * Plaque levels \>25% * Periodontitis * Multiple missing teeth * Cleft lip and/or palate or other craniofacial anomalies or syndromes * Patients taking any regular medication * Patients with asthmatic problems

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Appearance of white spot lesions (WSL) during orthodontic movement with fixed appliances.2 yearsNumber of participants with white spot lesions appearence during the 2-years period of orthodontic treatment
Appearance on inflammatory lesions during orthodontic treatmnet2 yearsNumber of participants showing signs of inflammation based on clinical parameters during the 2-year period of orthodontic treatment.
Changes from baseline in clinical parameters2 yearsplaque accumulation gingival inflammation pocket probing depth bleeding on probing gingival recessions

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient acceptance2 yearsVisual Analogue Scale (VAS) with 0: very satisfied and 10: unsatisfied
Tooth sensitivity2 yearsVisual Analogue Scale (VAS) with 0: no sensitivity and 10: worst senstitivity
Total bacterial counts and counts of 6 periodontal pathogens in subgingival samples from treated pockets2 yearsChanges from baseline of microorganisms will be identified and enumerated by laboratory Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction
Inflammatory markers in GCF from baseline2 yearsChanges of the Inflammatory markers in the gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) throughout the study will be analyzed by the Bioplex 200 Suspension array system. The concentration of these markers will be expreseed as pg/ml
Toral tretament time2 yearsTreatment time will be recorded at each visit

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 6, 2026