Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders
Conditions
Brief summary
This study is to determine if the auricular microstimulator produces the expected increase in HRV.
Detailed description
The aim of this proposal is to determine if utilizing an affordable tool like microstimulation utilizing a transcutaneous electric nerve stimulator (TENS) unit and applying the stimulation to the ear though an ear clip does improve vagal modulation. This can be easily done at home by utilizing the microstimulation for 2 hours/day and measuring vagal modulation before and after. Previous research investigating this had participants use the unit for 2 hours as well (Chelimsky et al., 2019), however the data from this study was inconclusive, and therefore this study aims to demonstrate effectiveness of the unit usage on heart rate variability (HRV). Although functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGID) affect 10%-20% of children and adolescents. 1-3 the pathophysiology remains unknown. The multiple current hypotheses include visceral hypersensitivity, altered brain-gut connections, dysbiosis, genetic and epigenetic factors, and increased gut permeability among others. 4 Since the vagus nerve links the brain to the gut, many studies of adult subjects have evaluated the cardiovagal modulation in this group of disorders. The cardiovagal modulation can be measured by heart rate variability (HRV). HRV evaluates the heart rate fluctuation over a period of time. HRV is considered a reliable tool to look at parasympathetic function, baroreflex function, and parasympathetic to sympathetic balance.5, 6 High-frequency (hf) HRV is a marker of vagal modulation. The low-frequency (lf) HRV probably reflects cardiac autonomic outflow from the baroreflex or parasympathetic regulation, rather than sympathetic modulation, although this is still being discussed.6, 7 A meta-analysis of adult subjects with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) showed decreased cardiovagal modulation.8 One study compared children aged 7-10 years of age with functional abdominal pain or IBS to healthy subjects. They found no difference in cardiovagal and cardiac sympathetic modulation.9 However, a study of young adolescents with different chronic pain syndromes, including chronic abdominal pain, showed decreased cardiovagal modulation.10 These findings are similar to those in many adult syndromes with chronic pain, such as chronic pelvic pain,11 complex regional pain syndrome,12 fibromyalgia,13 and chronic neck pain.14 Although future research would aim to investigate vagal modulation in those specifically with FGID, for preliminary data purposes we are testing the unit's effects on heart rate variability regardless of having/not having an FGID diagnosis.
Interventions
Usage of the Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation device for 2 hours a day.
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
FGID group, non-FGID group. Assigned to 2 hours of daily TENS usage
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Female * 12 - 21 years old * Either diagnosed OR not diagnosed with chronic idiopathic nausea, functional abdominal pain, dyspepsia and/or irritable bowel syndrome. * English speaking
Exclusion criteria
* Patients who are unable to stand upright during the heart rate variability recording * Patients with a known bleeding disorder * Patients with swollen, infected, inflamed, or other skin eruptions on outer ear * Patients with epilepsy * Patients with any implanted cardiac pacemaker or defibrillator * Patients with serious arterial circulatory problems in the lower limbs * Patients with abdominal or inguinal hernia * Patients who are pregnant * Any unstable medical condition, such as renal disease, uncontrolled diabetes, etc. * Requires new medication during the 4 weeks of the study that may affect the gastrointestinal symptoms, vagal modulation or immune response. * Practices over 1 hour of aerobic activity a day * Daily practice of abdominal breathing (yoga)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in High-frequency Heart Rate Variability (hfHRV) at 4 Weeks | Assessed at baseline and 4 weeks. | Determine if microstimulation over a 4 week period results in improvement in hfHRV power. Average hfHRV power was calculated at baseline and 4 weeks. The change in average hfHRV power in milliseconds squared from baseline to 4 weeks was calculated for each participant. The average change for each group is reported. |
| Rate of Compliance With Daily TENS Usage | Assessed daily for duration of study (4 weeks) via self-report recording journal. | Determine the compliance rate of adolescents utilizing a microstimulator. Compliance rate calculated as number of minutes unit was used (summed from all self-report daily recording journals) divided by 3360 (the total number of minutes the unit could have been used if the participant used it for 2 hours daily for 4 weeks). The rate average for each group is reported. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| FGID Patients with a FGID
TENS Unit: Usage of the Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation device for 2 hours a day. | 5 |
| Non-FGID Patients without a FGID
TENS Unit: Usage of the Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation device for 2 hours a day. | 3 |
| Total | 8 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Non-FGID | Total | FGID |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 5 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 3 Participants | 3 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 19 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 0 | 17.75 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.165 | 17 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.707 |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | — | 0 Participants | — |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 3 participants | 8 participants | 5 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 3 Participants | 8 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 5 | 0 / 3 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 4 / 5 | 3 / 3 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 5 | 0 / 3 |
Outcome results
Change in High-frequency Heart Rate Variability (hfHRV) at 4 Weeks
Determine if microstimulation over a 4 week period results in improvement in hfHRV power. Average hfHRV power was calculated at baseline and 4 weeks. The change in average hfHRV power in milliseconds squared from baseline to 4 weeks was calculated for each participant. The average change for each group is reported.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline and 4 weeks.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| FGID | Change in High-frequency Heart Rate Variability (hfHRV) at 4 Weeks | 23.517 ms squared | Standard Deviation 31.705 |
| Non-FGID | Change in High-frequency Heart Rate Variability (hfHRV) at 4 Weeks | 11.69 ms squared | Standard Deviation 19.644 |
Rate of Compliance With Daily TENS Usage
Determine the compliance rate of adolescents utilizing a microstimulator. Compliance rate calculated as number of minutes unit was used (summed from all self-report daily recording journals) divided by 3360 (the total number of minutes the unit could have been used if the participant used it for 2 hours daily for 4 weeks). The rate average for each group is reported.
Time frame: Assessed daily for duration of study (4 weeks) via self-report recording journal.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| FGID | Rate of Compliance With Daily TENS Usage | 0.598 percentage - compliance rate | Standard Deviation 0.296 |
| Non-FGID | Rate of Compliance With Daily TENS Usage | 0.823 percentage - compliance rate | Standard Deviation 0.211 |