Skip to content

Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Vagal Modulation

A Pilot Study of Auricular Microstimulation to Determine if it Improves Vagal Modulation

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05987813
Enrollment
8
Registered
2023-08-14
Start date
2023-10-18
Completion date
2024-06-04
Last updated
2024-12-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders

Brief summary

This study is to determine if the auricular microstimulator produces the expected increase in HRV.

Detailed description

The aim of this proposal is to determine if utilizing an affordable tool like microstimulation utilizing a transcutaneous electric nerve stimulator (TENS) unit and applying the stimulation to the ear though an ear clip does improve vagal modulation. This can be easily done at home by utilizing the microstimulation for 2 hours/day and measuring vagal modulation before and after. Previous research investigating this had participants use the unit for 2 hours as well (Chelimsky et al., 2019), however the data from this study was inconclusive, and therefore this study aims to demonstrate effectiveness of the unit usage on heart rate variability (HRV). Although functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGID) affect 10%-20% of children and adolescents. 1-3 the pathophysiology remains unknown. The multiple current hypotheses include visceral hypersensitivity, altered brain-gut connections, dysbiosis, genetic and epigenetic factors, and increased gut permeability among others. 4 Since the vagus nerve links the brain to the gut, many studies of adult subjects have evaluated the cardiovagal modulation in this group of disorders. The cardiovagal modulation can be measured by heart rate variability (HRV). HRV evaluates the heart rate fluctuation over a period of time. HRV is considered a reliable tool to look at parasympathetic function, baroreflex function, and parasympathetic to sympathetic balance.5, 6 High-frequency (hf) HRV is a marker of vagal modulation. The low-frequency (lf) HRV probably reflects cardiac autonomic outflow from the baroreflex or parasympathetic regulation, rather than sympathetic modulation, although this is still being discussed.6, 7 A meta-analysis of adult subjects with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) showed decreased cardiovagal modulation.8 One study compared children aged 7-10 years of age with functional abdominal pain or IBS to healthy subjects. They found no difference in cardiovagal and cardiac sympathetic modulation.9 However, a study of young adolescents with different chronic pain syndromes, including chronic abdominal pain, showed decreased cardiovagal modulation.10 These findings are similar to those in many adult syndromes with chronic pain, such as chronic pelvic pain,11 complex regional pain syndrome,12 fibromyalgia,13 and chronic neck pain.14 Although future research would aim to investigate vagal modulation in those specifically with FGID, for preliminary data purposes we are testing the unit's effects on heart rate variability regardless of having/not having an FGID diagnosis.

Interventions

DEVICETENS Unit

Usage of the Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation device for 2 hours a day.

Sponsors

Virginia Commonwealth University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

FGID group, non-FGID group. Assigned to 2 hours of daily TENS usage

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
12 Years to 21 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Female * 12 - 21 years old * Either diagnosed OR not diagnosed with chronic idiopathic nausea, functional abdominal pain, dyspepsia and/or irritable bowel syndrome. * English speaking

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who are unable to stand upright during the heart rate variability recording * Patients with a known bleeding disorder * Patients with swollen, infected, inflamed, or other skin eruptions on outer ear * Patients with epilepsy * Patients with any implanted cardiac pacemaker or defibrillator * Patients with serious arterial circulatory problems in the lower limbs * Patients with abdominal or inguinal hernia * Patients who are pregnant * Any unstable medical condition, such as renal disease, uncontrolled diabetes, etc. * Requires new medication during the 4 weeks of the study that may affect the gastrointestinal symptoms, vagal modulation or immune response. * Practices over 1 hour of aerobic activity a day * Daily practice of abdominal breathing (yoga)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in High-frequency Heart Rate Variability (hfHRV) at 4 WeeksAssessed at baseline and 4 weeks.Determine if microstimulation over a 4 week period results in improvement in hfHRV power. Average hfHRV power was calculated at baseline and 4 weeks. The change in average hfHRV power in milliseconds squared from baseline to 4 weeks was calculated for each participant. The average change for each group is reported.
Rate of Compliance With Daily TENS UsageAssessed daily for duration of study (4 weeks) via self-report recording journal.Determine the compliance rate of adolescents utilizing a microstimulator. Compliance rate calculated as number of minutes unit was used (summed from all self-report daily recording journals) divided by 3360 (the total number of minutes the unit could have been used if the participant used it for 2 hours daily for 4 weeks). The rate average for each group is reported.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
FGID
Patients with a FGID TENS Unit: Usage of the Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation device for 2 hours a day.
5
Non-FGID
Patients without a FGID TENS Unit: Usage of the Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation device for 2 hours a day.
3
Total8

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNon-FGIDTotalFGID
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants5 Participants5 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
3 Participants3 Participants0 Participants
Age, Continuous19 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0
17.75 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.165
17 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.707
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
3 participants8 participants5 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants8 Participants5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 50 / 3
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 53 / 3
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 50 / 3

Outcome results

Primary

Change in High-frequency Heart Rate Variability (hfHRV) at 4 Weeks

Determine if microstimulation over a 4 week period results in improvement in hfHRV power. Average hfHRV power was calculated at baseline and 4 weeks. The change in average hfHRV power in milliseconds squared from baseline to 4 weeks was calculated for each participant. The average change for each group is reported.

Time frame: Assessed at baseline and 4 weeks.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FGIDChange in High-frequency Heart Rate Variability (hfHRV) at 4 Weeks23.517 ms squaredStandard Deviation 31.705
Non-FGIDChange in High-frequency Heart Rate Variability (hfHRV) at 4 Weeks11.69 ms squaredStandard Deviation 19.644
Primary

Rate of Compliance With Daily TENS Usage

Determine the compliance rate of adolescents utilizing a microstimulator. Compliance rate calculated as number of minutes unit was used (summed from all self-report daily recording journals) divided by 3360 (the total number of minutes the unit could have been used if the participant used it for 2 hours daily for 4 weeks). The rate average for each group is reported.

Time frame: Assessed daily for duration of study (4 weeks) via self-report recording journal.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FGIDRate of Compliance With Daily TENS Usage0.598 percentage - compliance rateStandard Deviation 0.296
Non-FGIDRate of Compliance With Daily TENS Usage0.823 percentage - compliance rateStandard Deviation 0.211

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026